For the first time outside a medical context, the High Court declined to apply the traditional Bolam v Friern Barnet Hospital Management Committee  1 WLR 582 test for the standard of care in favour of the new test in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board  AC 1430.
In O’Hare & ors v Coutts & Co  EWHC 2224 (QB), Coutts, the private bank, was found to owe a duty to take reasonable care to ensure its clients were aware of the risks of suggested investments. This is an important development in professional negligence law and one that may have far-reaching consequences.
This article is part of our subscription-based access. Please pick one of the options below to continue.
Already registered? Login to access premium content
The Corporate IP Licence is tailored to your firm, making it the most cost effective way for the firm to access Solicitors Journal, and enables the firm to remain compliant with copyright and our Terms and Conditions. This gives you the ability to print and circulate articles within the firm.
To enquire about a Corporate IP Licence for your firm, please contact our Subscriptions Manager on firstname.lastname@example.org.