Editor, Solicitors Journal

COSTS RULING

31 Dec 2020News

The appeal court has clarified who should pay costs when an interim injunction is granted. In Digby v Melford [2020] EWCA Civ 1647, the court affirmed the longstanding principle that when it issues an interim injunction, costs will normally be reserved unless there are special factors. It overturned a ruling that the claimant pay costs of £277,000 for two short unopposed hearings. Paul Thomas, commercial litigation lawyer at Thomas Mansfield Solicitors, said the decision 'marks an important milestone for litigation practitioners across England and Wales'. 18 December 2020

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com

Latest Articles

Sorry seems to be the hardest word… changes afoot for the law of apologies

Oliver Lock from Farrer & Co takes a closer look at the changes being proposed to legislation to facilitate apologies without admitting liability

Merricks v Mastercard: the first contested settlement of a funded class action

Emma Carr and Louise Macdonald from Gowling WLG provide an overview of the ruling and its significance

Optis v Apple: Court of Appeal redefines FRAND principles for global SEP licensing

Court of Appeal overturns High Court ruling, restoring comparables-based FRAND valuation and reshaping SEP dispute standards.

Law Society voices concerns over Data Act

The Law Society supports the Data Act's goal to modernise data use while raising concerns about privacy protections

New law tightens citizenship appeal rules

A new law aims to keep potential security threats from regaining British citizenship during appeal processes

Overcrowded prisons lead to increased violence

New research highlights a concerning link between overcrowded prisons and rising violence rates among inmates

New law promotes equality in sentencing

A new law ensures that pre-sentence reports will fairly treat individuals irrespective of race or religion

High Court Clarifies Cost Liability in Illiquidx v Altana Trade Secrets Case

Costs ruling highlights precision’s impact in complex commercial confidentiality disputes.

Privy Council Clarifies Easement Registration in Cayman Shores Development Ruling

Privy Council overturns misclassified recreational rights as easements in landmark Cayman Islands property case.

Rasmala v Trafigura: Key Restitution and Unjust Enrichment Ruling

The High Court has dismissed a $21 million restitution claim in Rasmala Trade Finance Fund v Trafigura PTE Ltd (2025), with significant implications for recovery in commercial fraud cases involving innocent third parties.

Protecting the public interest in the practice of law

The SRA relies on self-reporting to function, yet confusion and inertia risk enabling professional misconduct.

The report on improving family court services for children is an unsurprisingly depressing read for family law practitioners

Rachel Frost-Smith, Legal Director of the Family Team at Birketts, shares her experience of the impact of the delays in family court proceedings