Editor, Solicitors Journal

[print title] Cyber PII cover [date]n13 April 2021

SRA consults on cyber loss cover

16 Apr 2021|News|Add your comment

The SRA is consulting on the inclusion of a cyber loss cover clause in the minimum terms and conditions (MTC) of firms' PII

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is consulting on the inclusion of a cyber loss cover clause in the minimum terms and conditions (MTC) of law firms’ professional indemnity insurance (PII). The proposed change would clarify that PII must cover client losses caused by cyber attack. Cybercrime accounted for £2.5m of reported losses to firms in the first half of 2020. SRA chief executive Paul Philip is seeking views on the proposal from firms and individuals. The consultation closes on 24 May.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Comments

Latest Articles

Reforms to solicitors’ costs must be evidence-based

The Law Society has expressed support for reforms to solicitors’ costs rules, stressing the need for evidence-based proposals that ensure fairness for clients and solicitors...

New digital patent services improve access

A suite of digital services for applying, managing, and renewing UK patents has been launched by the IPO

UN opinion on IPP sentences imminent

The United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention is set to review the legality of IPP sentences

Employers unprepared for major law changes

New research reveals that 91% of employers are not fully prepared for the Employment Rights Act reforms ahead

New rules could change cohabitation rights

Unmarried couples in the UK may soon gain enhanced legal protections after a government consultation process

Re Beth [2026] EWFC 156 (B): Family Court identifies perpetrator of non-accidental injuries in infant fact-finding proceedings

HHJ Case finds Intervenor caused femoral fracture and bruising to infant in sole care; threshold met against mother.

The Local Authority v The Mother [2026] EWFC 166 (B): Resolutions assessment refused and special guardianship order made in non-accidental injury proceedings

HHJ Hesford refuses Resolutions assessment and makes SGO for paternal grandparents in NAI care proceedings.

PSA v General Dental Council and Rahman: six-month suspension quashed in dentist sexual misconduct appeal

Sweeting J allows PSA appeal after finding Committee failed to evaluate repeated sexual misconduct holistically.

Musst Holdings v Astra Asset Management: ATE premiums and litigation funding fees not recoverable as damages

Leech J dismisses novel claim to recover ATE premiums and litigation funding fees as damages.

A1 v Home Secretary: Court of Appeal allows revocation appeal in terrorism refugee status case

Singh LJ finds logical inconsistency in FTT's section 72 danger assessment; case remitted for redetermination.

High Court refuses Tate brothers permission for judicial review over complainants' identity disclosure

Chamberlain J finds neither irrationality nor Article 6 breach arguable in extradition disclosure challenge.

Wild Justice v Natural England: High Court refuses advisory declaration in badger cull licensing challenge

High Court rejects environmental NGOs' bid for hypothetical guidance on badger cull licensing irrelevancies.

High Court makes declaration of parentage against former BATUK soldier in Re YZ DNA case

DNA evidence proving 99.9999999% paternity probability defeats respondent's challenge to chain of evidence.

SJ Interview: Chris Spelman

Chris Spelman is a partner in DWF's London dispute resolution team, specialising in financial services litigation and investigations, whistleblowing matters, and class action, securities and...

When the rules can't keep up

From Westminster to the courts, the rules are being written faster than they can settle