News, Features and Opinion Editor, Solicitors Journal

Government to triple fines for supporting illegal immigrants

8 Aug 202360 Seconds

The government says it is cracking down on employers and landlords who allow illegal migrants to work for them or rent their properties

In a press release on 7 August, the Home Office said:

The civil penalty for employers, which was last increased in 2014, will be raised to up to £45,000 per illegal worker for a first breach from £15,000, and up to £60,000 for repeat breaches from £20,000.

For landlords the fines will increase from £80 per lodger and £1,000 per occupier for a first breach to up to £5,000 per lodger and £10,000 per occupier. Repeat breaches will be up to £10,000 per lodger and £20,000 per occupier, up from £500 and £3,000 respectively. The higher penalties will come in at the start of 2024.

Later this year the Home Office will consult on options to strengthen action against licensed businesses who are employing illegal workers.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com

In a press release on 7 August, the Home Office said:

Later this year the Home Office will consult on options to strengthen action against licensed businesses who are employing illegal workers.

Latest Articles

Family property disputes expose risks of informal financial arrangements

A High Court TOLATA dispute highlights evidential difficulties, freezing injunction thresholds, and risks arising from undocumented family loans

Hantavirus outbreak claims hinge on causation and jurisdiction

Serious ship incidents trigger complex claims where law, evidence, forum and causation determine outcomes

Advertising ruling supports Chris Packham's claim

Advertising Standards Authority rules meat and dairy ads mislead on environmental impact, marking regulatory change

AA v Waltham Forest: Court of Appeal draws firm line between Part 6 and Part 7 housing duties

Steps to allocate social housing cannot be incorporated into a homeless applicant's personal plan, the Court of Appeal has ruled.

Summerson and Brown convictions upheld despite missing mens rea direction in Palestine Action affray case

Court of Appeal confirms affray convictions safe where jury's factual findings make intent inevitable

Amin v Manchester Airport Group: EAT upholds strike-out after deposit order non-payment

Employment Appeal Tribunal confirms no error of law in refusal of relief from sanctions and dismisses bias allegations against tribunal judge

Jennings v Appleby: Lloyd Trust judgement confirms administrative unworkability assessed at creation, not over time

A High Court ruling on a century-old employee welfare trust with over a million potential beneficiaries

Timokhin v Timokhina: High Court refuses stay and awards indemnity costs following Russian judgement enforcement ruling

A former wife's bid to delay enforcement of a £417,000 debt has been dismissed in its entirety, with the court awarding indemnity costs and Part...

Ismailov v Secretary of State: High Court upholds sanctions designation based on family association with Usmanov

The Administrative Court dismisses all seven grounds of challenge to Russia sanctions maintained against the nephew of oligarch Alisher Usmanov.

Lodhia v Twelve Trees: High Court orders costs against claimant who discontinued defamation claim amid document authenticity concerns

A leaseholder who sued his estate's management company for defamation has been ordered to pay substantial costs after discontinuing his claim, with the court also...