LoginSubscribe Now
Follow Us
Sign up to our free newsletter
Solicitors Journal LogoInforming the legal profession since 1856

Find the knowledge you need from the SJ library of over 20,000 legal articles

Search now
Solicitors Journal Logo
  • Legal News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Practice Notes
  • Business
  • International
  • Court Reports
  • AI Search
  • Digital Edition
  • Subscription Options
  • Advertise with Us
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • FAQ
    • Guide to Authors
Solicitors Journal

Informing the legal profession since 1856.

Follow us

Topics

  • Legal News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Practice Notes
  • Business
  • International
  • Court Reports

About

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • FAQ
  • Guide to Authors

Subscribe

  • Subscription Options
  • Digital Edition
  • Free Newsletter

Editorial

editorial@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

Subscriptions

subscriptions@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

Advertising

Advertise with usadvertising@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

© 2026 Solicitors Journal in partnership with the International In-house Counsel Journal

ISSN 0038-1047  ·  Images: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors

Terms and ConditionsCookie PolicyPrivacy PolicyPLS Clear logoCopyright & permissions
Justin TarkaJustin Tarka

Associate, Ogletree Deakins International

Quotation Marks
“A sensible approach would be to have a remote working policy in place. This should be regularly reviewed by the employer, and easily accessible to workers.”

Back to (hybrid) work we go: health and safety HSAW 1974 after covid-19

24 Jun 2022|Opinion|Add your comment
Share:
Back to (hybrid) work we go: health and safety HSAW 1974 after covid-19

By Justin Tarka

Justin Tarka considers employers' duty of care for employees and workers

During lockdown, thousands of employers were forced to tell their staff to work from their homes. Overnight, offices became empty. Given the sudden nature of the change, understandably, while covid-19 was at the forefront of everyone’s mind in the workplace, wider health and safety concerns were not. Employees were working from their homes, stopping the spread of the virus. Did the employer have a responsibility with regards to their health and safety given they were not attending the workplace?

A recent study by PIRC, a corporate governance advisory firm, has shown UK companies have been drastically underreporting workplace injuries. Post-covid 19, with new hybrid models of working, now is the prime time for companies to check their health and safety procedures are compliant with UK law.

What is required by law

Breach of health and safety laws can have criminal and civil consequences for employers. All employers have a legal obligation to protect their staff when at work. Failure to do so can result in action from regulators, such as the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) under criminal law, or result in civil claims for compensation from impacted employees.

Employers are obliged by law to conduct a risk assessment of employees’ working environments. The responsibilities for employees working from home is the same as any other worker – whether they work entirely remotely or split their time between their home and the workplace.

Usually, employers will not need to conduct the assessment at the employee’s home. However, it may be appropriate to do so for employees who have particular needs – for example, if they are particularly vulnerable or have a disability.

Workers also have a responsibility to take care of their own health and safety and others who may be harmed by their actions carried out in the course of their work. Cooperation with employers is required to ensure all duties under the law are met. As part of this, employees should report risks and hazards to their employer.

What should employers practically do?

Risk assessment templates should be provided to home workers for them to complete. These should be collected and reviewed with the employee to address any issues arising from the risk assessment. If employees Best practice would be to provide training on how to conduct a risk assessment to ensure it’s completed effectively by all employees.

Employers should talk to their staff about their working arrangements, as working at home may not be suitable for everyone. For example, some people may not have an appropriate place to work, or may prefer to come into the workplace for wellbeing, mental health or other reasons.

A sensible approach would be to have a remote working policy in place. This should be regularly reviewed by the employer and easily accessible to workers. The policy will ensure there are appropriate measures in place for home working which will be applied consistently across the business. In the policy, expectations for working habits when at home (such as reminders to take rest breaks) should be included, to make sure workers understand what is expected of them when they are homeworking. Even though they are at home, they should not feel as though they should work longer hours as opposed to when they are in the office.

Latest Articles

During lockdown, thousands of employers were forced to tell their staff to work from their homes. Overnight, offices became empty. Given the sudden nature of the change, understandably, while covid-19 was at the forefront of everyone’s mind in the workplace, wider health and safety concerns were not. Employees were working from their homes, stopping the spread of the virus. Did the employer have a responsibility with regards to their health and safety given they were not attending the workplace?

A recent study by PIRC, a corporate governance advisory firm, has shown UK companies have been drastically underreporting workplace injuries. Post-covid 19, with new hybrid models of working, now is the prime time for companies to check their health and safety procedures are compliant with UK law.

What is required by law

Breach of health and safety laws can have criminal and civil consequences for employers. All employers have a legal obligation to protect their staff when at work. Failure to do so can result in action from regulators, such as the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) under criminal law, or result in civil claims for compensation from impacted employees.

Employers are obliged by law to conduct a risk assessment of employees’ working environments. The responsibilities for employees working from home is the same as any other worker – whether they work entirely remotely or split their time between their home and the workplace.

Usually, employers will not need to conduct the assessment at the employee’s home. However, it may be appropriate to do so for employees who have particular needs – for example, if they are particularly vulnerable or have a disability.

Workers also have a responsibility to take care of their own health and safety and others who may be harmed by their actions carried out in the course of their work. Cooperation with employers is required to ensure all duties under the law are met. As part of this, employees should report risks and hazards to their employer.

What should employers practically do?

Risk assessment templates should be provided to home workers for them to complete. These should be collected and reviewed with the employee to address any issues arising from the risk assessment. If employees Best practice would be to provide training on how to conduct a risk assessment to ensure it’s completed effectively by all employees.

Employers should talk to their staff about their working arrangements, as working at home may not be suitable for everyone. For example, some people may not have an appropriate place to work, or may prefer to come into the workplace for wellbeing, mental health or other reasons.

A sensible approach would be to have a remote working policy in place. This should be regularly reviewed by the employer and easily accessible to workers. The policy will ensure there are appropriate measures in place for home working which will be applied consistently across the business. In the policy, expectations for working habits when at home (such as reminders to take rest breaks) should be included, to make sure workers understand what is expected of them when they are homeworking. Even though they are at home, they should not feel as though they should work longer hours as opposed to when they are in the office.

Mental health and wellbeing

There are some things employers can do to help prevent stress and help workers look after their mental health when working from home.

Staying in regular contact with staff, ideally by phone and/or video call, in teams and one-to-one, is a good way to ensure regular casual check-ins on their wellbeing and spot any potential issues. Employers should encourage open dialogue and talk to employees about workload, to facilitate support where appropriate. Reminding employees to take regular breaks during the day when working from home is important. Further reassurance can include encouraging employees to rest when they are unwell, and facilitating, where possible, use of annual leave.

Most importantly, make sure employees know how to get help if they need it. Reminding employees of the typical signs of stress can help them regulate their own wellbeing at work. If employers are concerned anything is affecting someone’s mental health or wellbeing, they could encourage them to speak to their doctor, or arrange assistance from an occupational health provider.

Justin Tarka is an employment solicitor at Ogletree Deakins: ogletreedeakins.com

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|PLS LogoCopyright & permissions

Mental health and wellbeing

There are some things employers can do to help prevent stress and help workers look after their mental health when working from home.

Staying in regular contact with staff, ideally by phone and/or video call, in teams and one-to-one, is a good way to ensure regular casual check-ins on their wellbeing and spot any potential issues. Employers should encourage open dialogue and talk to employees about workload, to facilitate support where appropriate. Reminding employees to take regular breaks during the day when working from home is important. Further reassurance can include encouraging employees to rest when they are unwell, and facilitating, where possible, use of annual leave.

Most importantly, make sure employees know how to get help if they need it. Reminding employees of the typical signs of stress can help them regulate their own wellbeing at work. If employers are concerned anything is affecting someone’s mental health or wellbeing, they could encourage them to speak to their doctor, or arrange assistance from an occupational health provider.

Justin Tarka is an employment solicitor at Ogletree Deakins: ogletreedeakins.com

Related Topics

  • Discrimination
  • Employment
  • Health & Safety
  • Procedures
  • Professional negligence
  • Covid-19
  • Ethics and Compliance
  • Leadership
  • Risk & Compliance

Comments

Dexia v Torino: lessons from the latest swaps ruling
Solicitors Journal

Dexia v Torino: lessons from the latest swaps ruling

The Commercial Court clarifies jurisdiction, capacity and validity issues arising from Italian local-authority swaps
Practice Notes10 Aug 2026
Coroner to examine care home death
Solicitors Journal

Coroner to examine care home death

A coroner will review care practices at Ballater House Care Home after the tragic death of Daniel Lindsay
News10 Aug 2026
Lloyds Bank fraud case heads to trial
Solicitors Journal

Lloyds Bank fraud case heads to trial

The High Court has set a trial date for October 2028 in a significant claim against Lloyds Bank regarding an alleged £1 billion corporate fraud...
News10 Aug 2026
SQN Global v Hughes: High Court finds fraudulent trading by Genesis haulage directors
Solicitors Journal

SQN Global v Hughes: High Court finds fraudulent trading by Genesis haulage directors

Court finds haulage company directors dissipated assets in breach of a freezing order.
Court Report10 Aug 2026
Wallace Estates v Durkan Estates: Court gives first guidance on joint TCC and FTT case management
Solicitors Journal

Wallace Estates v Durkan Estates: Court gives first guidance on joint TCC and FTT case management

First joint TCC-FTT hearing sets template for managing overlapping Building Safety Act disputes.
Court Report10 Aug 2026
Haines v Talbott: High Court apportions liability 70:30 after A30 smoke collision
Solicitors Journal

Haines v Talbott: High Court apportions liability 70:30 after A30 smoke collision

High Court finds van driver negligent but claimant contributorily negligent after smoke-obscured collision.
Court Report10 Aug 2026
Sucden Financial v TMT Metals: Court of Appeal orders defence served despite pending Supreme Court appeal
Solicitors Journal

Sucden Financial v TMT Metals: Court of Appeal orders defence served despite pending Supreme Court appeal

Court of Appeal balances jurisdiction appeal rights against need to progress underlying fraud claim proceedings.
Court Report10 Aug 2026
Duffy v House of Gods: EAT quashes refusal of interim relief in whistleblowing case
Solicitors Journal

Duffy v House of Gods: EAT quashes refusal of interim relief in whistleblowing case

Employment Appeal Tribunal finds tribunal wrongly treated factual disputes as decisive in interim relief application.
Court Report10 Aug 2026
MUF v Secretary of State for Defence: High Court quashes fourth ARAP refusal for Afghan judge
Solicitors Journal

MUF v Secretary of State for Defence: High Court quashes fourth ARAP refusal for Afghan judge

High Court quashes fourth refusal of Afghan judge's relocation application under ARAP scheme.
Court Report7 Aug 2026
Mohammed Sarwar v Bilal Sarwar: High Court dismisses unfair prejudice petition over hotel business split
Solicitors Journal

Mohammed Sarwar v Bilal Sarwar: High Court dismisses unfair prejudice petition over hotel business split

High Court rejects family's unfair prejudice claim after finding hotel business division agreement genuine.
Court Report7 Aug 2026
David Hill v HMRC: Upper Tribunal clarifies scope of reasonable excuse based on adviser reliance
Solicitors Journal

David Hill v HMRC: Upper Tribunal clarifies scope of reasonable excuse based on adviser reliance

Upper Tribunal partly allows appeal over penalties for non-compliance with HMRC information notices.
Court Report7 Aug 2026
Code Students v Nottingham City Council: High Court refuses judicial review over rival scheme approval
Solicitors Journal

Code Students v Nottingham City Council: High Court refuses judicial review over rival scheme approval

High Court refuses permission for judicial review of Nottingham student accommodation planning decision.
Court Report7 Aug 2026
KDY v Nicholas Langham: High Court strikes out 300-page claim against eleven defendants
Solicitors Journal

KDY v Nicholas Langham: High Court strikes out 300-page claim against eleven defendants

High Court strikes out sprawling multi-defendant claim brought by mother on behalf of disabled son.
Court Report7 Aug 2026
SJ Interview: Hannah Field
Solicitors Journal

SJ Interview: Hannah Field

Hannah Field, head of Shoosmiths’ London office and its Dispute Resolution & Litigation team in London, speaks to Solicitors Journal about the firm’s growth strategy,...
Interview28 Jul 2026
The judgement behind the answer
Solicitors Journal

The judgement behind the answer

Foreword7 Aug 2026