Asbestos compensation reforms call for action

Major reforms to the compensation scheme for asbestos and dust-disease victims are set to be implemented with an emphasis on urgent government resourcing
The head of industrial disease at law firm Slater and Gordon has expressed optimism about significant upcoming reforms to the government compensation scheme for victims of asbestos and dust-related diseases. Jordan Bell welcomed the changes, which aim to enhance support for those affected while stressing the need for adequate government resources to ensure timely processing of claims. He highlighted that the new regulations will come into effect on 31 October 2026 and will reform the Pneumoconiosis etc. (Workers' Compensation) Act 1979 scheme alongside the 2008 Diffuse Mesothelioma Scheme.
Under the present system, families face financial hardships when a worker passes away before obtaining compensation for a workplace dust disease. Dependants currently receive a greatly reduced statutory payment compared to what the deceased would have garnered. The imminent reform seeks to rectify this by allowing bereaved dependants to claim the same compensation rates as sufferers. “The upcoming changes coming into force on 31 October represent a significant, compassionate and welcome improvement to the statutory compensation system for people affected by occupational asbestos-related and dust-related diseases, such as mesothelioma,” stated Jordan Bell.
He elaborated that mesothelioma, known for its aggressive nature, often leads to premature deaths before claims can be fully processed. As a result, families frequently find themselves disadvantaged by a system that historically inadequate. “Families who have already endured the devastating reality of occupational diseases have been treated like an afterthought by a system that slashed their financial support if a loved one passed away,” he added. The new framework will also streamline compensation by introducing a simplified award structure, which removes outdated top-up payments.
Jordan reinforced that while these reforms are pivotal, statutory payments should be viewed not as replacements but as additions to civil compensation claims against negligent employers or insurers. “It is also important that people understand that these statutory government payments are not a substitute for pursuing a civil compensation claim wherever a claim is possible,” he stated. He urged individuals to explore all potential avenues for compensation, stressing the necessity of thorough investigations into civil claims to secure justice. “Successful claims against employers and insurers can provide substantially higher levels of compensation, especially in cases involving serious illness or permanent disablement.”
While the anticipated reforms signify progress, Jordan cautioned that their success hinges on speedy operational deployment and ample resources to manage claims processing effectively. “While these reforms will improve financial support for sufferers and their dependants, the absolute priority must always be ensuring that the relevant government teams are properly resourced so that applications are processed as quickly as possible, especially for living claimants,” he mentioned.
He urged anyone diagnosed with an asbestos-related or dust-related disease to seek specialist legal advice immediately. “Because of the complex interaction between government funds and corporate liability, my advice is that anyone diagnosed with an asbestos-related or dust-related disease should seek specialist legal advice as early as possible,” he recommended. The newly instituted rules are a significant step forward, designed to better support families grappling with the devastating impacts of occupational diseases, ensuring they access the compensation and support they deserve.












