LoginSubscribe Now
Follow Us
Sign up to our free newsletter
Solicitors Journal LogoInforming the legal profession since 1856

Find the knowledge you need from the SJ library of over 20,000 legal articles

Search now
Solicitors Journal Logo
  • Legal News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Practice Notes
  • Business
  • International
  • Court Reports
  • AI Search
  • Digital Edition
  • Subscription Options
  • Advertise with Us
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • FAQ
    • Guide to Authors
Solicitors Journal

Informing the legal profession since 1856.

Follow us

Topics

  • Legal News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Practice Notes
  • Business
  • International
  • Court Reports

About

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • FAQ
  • Guide to Authors

Subscribe

  • Subscription Options
  • Digital Edition
  • Free Newsletter

Editorial

editorial@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

Subscriptions

subscriptions@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

Advertising

Advertise with usadvertising@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

© 2026 Solicitors Journal in partnership with the International In-house Counsel Journal

ISSN 0038-1047  ·  Images: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors

Terms and ConditionsCookie PolicyPrivacy PolicyPLS Clear logoCopyright & permissions
Jean-Yves GilgJean-Yves Gilg

Editor, Solicitors Journal

SRA calls for abolition of minimum salary for trainees

11 Jan 2012|News|Add your comment
Share:
SRA calls for abolition of minimum salary for trainees

By Jean-Yves Gilg

The SRA has backed abolition of the minimum salary for trainee solicitors and suggested that they could instead be paid the national minimum wage.

The SRA has backed abolition of the minimum salary for trainee solicitors and suggested that they could instead be paid the national minimum wage.

In a consultation paper launched this afternoon, the regulator argued that the minimum salary for trainees was introduced in 1982, before the arrival of the national minimum.

The minimum salary for trainees is currently set at £18,590 in central London and £16,650 outside, for the year from 1 August 2011 to 1 August 2012.

The rate is unchanged from the previous year. The national minimum wage for those aged 21 and above is £6.08 per hour.

'Our consultation paper explains that there is no clear evidence that setting a minimum salary for trainees fulfils any of the regulatory objectives within the Legal Services Act,' SRA executive director Samantha Barrass said.

'We do not regulate prices, including rate of pay, in any other area of our work. We have compared the practice with other professional regulators and found very few examples where this occurs.

'It would appear that setting a minimum salary does not address any identified risk to the public interest or the rule of law, nor is it clear that it improves access to the profession.'

In the consultation paper SRA officials said the minimum salary was 'out of step' with outcomes-focused regulation and the SRA did not attempt to control the legal employment market 'in any other way'.

They went on: 'We do not, for example, set minimum salaries for anyone else providing legal services in a firm we might regulate or minimum salaries for the provision of particular legal services.

'We have also looked at the practice in other professions which shows that, with the exception of the Bar Standards Board, no other regulator included in the sample prescribes, or suggests, a minimum salary for trainees.

'The SRA board is of the view, therefore, that there is no clear regulatory justification for the SRA to continue to set a minimum salary for trainees and we would welcome your views on the prospect of deregulation in this area.'

Officials said 30 per cent of trainees were paid just above the minimum wage, but if it was abolished they would still be 'protected' by a national minimum wage of £6.08 per hour.

'The potential for employers to reduce salary levels in the event of deregulation must be balanced against the fact that the existence of a prescribed minimum salary level that is higher than the national minimum wage could also be acting as a deterrent to some firms taking on trainees.

'Deregulation could have a positive effect if some firms decide to start taking trainees or decide to take on more trainees than they might have done if the minimum requirement remained in force.

'Currently, many LPC graduates do obtain legal employment, but as paralegals rather than trainees. The minimum salary requirement may be a factor in employers choosing to employ graduates in this way.'

The SRA last considered abolishing the minimum salary in 2007, but decided against it after a consultation showed overwhelming support to prevent exploitation of trainees and improve access to the profession (see solicitorsjournal.com, 5 June 2007).

The SRA's latest consultation paper revealed that 42 per cent of BME trainees were paid the minimum salary, compared to 27 per cent of white trainees.

Related Topics

  • Regulators

Comments

Latest Articles

The SRA has backed abolition of the minimum salary for trainee solicitors and suggested that they could instead be paid the national minimum wage.

In a consultation paper launched this afternoon, the regulator argued that the minimum salary for trainees was introduced in 1982, before the arrival of the national minimum.

The minimum salary for trainees is currently set at £18,590 in central London and £16,650 outside, for the year from 1 August 2011 to 1 August 2012.

The rate is unchanged from the previous year. The national minimum wage for those aged 21 and above is £6.08 per hour.

'Our consultation paper explains that there is no clear evidence that setting a minimum salary for trainees fulfils any of the regulatory objectives within the Legal Services Act,' SRA executive director Samantha Barrass said.

'We do not regulate prices, including rate of pay, in any other area of our work. We have compared the practice with other professional regulators and found very few examples where this occurs.

'It would appear that setting a minimum salary does not address any identified risk to the public interest or the rule of law, nor is it clear that it improves access to the profession.'

In the consultation paper SRA officials said the minimum salary was 'out of step' with outcomes-focused regulation and the SRA did not attempt to control the legal employment market 'in any other way'.

They went on: 'We do not, for example, set minimum salaries for anyone else providing legal services in a firm we might regulate or minimum salaries for the provision of particular legal services.

'We have also looked at the practice in other professions which shows that, with the exception of the Bar Standards Board, no other regulator included in the sample prescribes, or suggests, a minimum salary for trainees.

'The SRA board is of the view, therefore, that there is no clear regulatory justification for the SRA to continue to set a minimum salary for trainees and we would welcome your views on the prospect of deregulation in this area.'

Officials said 30 per cent of trainees were paid just above the minimum wage, but if it was abolished they would still be 'protected' by a national minimum wage of £6.08 per hour.

'The potential for employers to reduce salary levels in the event of deregulation must be balanced against the fact that the existence of a prescribed minimum salary level that is higher than the national minimum wage could also be acting as a deterrent to some firms taking on trainees.

'Deregulation could have a positive effect if some firms decide to start taking trainees or decide to take on more trainees than they might have done if the minimum requirement remained in force.

'Currently, many LPC graduates do obtain legal employment, but as paralegals rather than trainees. The minimum salary requirement may be a factor in employers choosing to employ graduates in this way.'

The SRA last considered abolishing the minimum salary in 2007, but decided against it after a consultation showed overwhelming support to prevent exploitation of trainees and improve access to the profession (see solicitorsjournal.com, 5 June 2007).

The SRA's latest consultation paper revealed that 42 per cent of BME trainees were paid the minimum salary, compared to 27 per cent of white trainees.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|PLS LogoCopyright & permissions
Protecting your face: trade marks in the AI age
Solicitors Journal

Protecting your face: trade marks in the AI age

As AI makes convincing deepfakes effortless, public figures are turning to trade mark law to protect their valuable image
Practice Notes30 Jun 2026
UK litigation funding sector in crisis
Solicitors Journal

UK litigation funding sector in crisis

A recent report reveals that the UK's litigation funding sector is lagging behind global competitors due to government inaction
News30 Jun 2026
Domestic killers will face longer sentences
Solicitors Journal

Domestic killers will face longer sentences

A new legal change will see domestic murderers face a 25-year sentencing starting point for their crimes
News30 Jun 2026
Upper Tribunal cuts business rates on anaerobic digester plants in Bay Farm Power v Prescott
Solicitors Journal

Upper Tribunal cuts business rates on anaerobic digester plants in Bay Farm Power v Prescott

Upper Tribunal reduces rateable values of two anaerobic digester plants after revisiting tenant's share methodology.
Court Report30 Jun 2026
Implied misrepresentation claim survives strike out in Bromcom v Arbor Education Partners
Solicitors Journal

Implied misrepresentation claim survives strike out in Bromcom v Arbor Education Partners

High Court allows unlawful means conspiracy claim over school MIS procurement to proceed to trial.
Court Report30 Jun 2026
Court clarifies moratorium creditor super priority in Re Cross Transport Ltd
Solicitors Journal

Court clarifies moratorium creditor super priority in Re Cross Transport Ltd

High Court rules administrators may fund litigation ahead of paying super priority moratorium creditors.
Court Report30 Jun 2026
High Court quashes disbarment in Anurag Mohindru KC v Bar Standards Board
Solicitors Journal

High Court quashes disbarment in Anurag Mohindru KC v Bar Standards Board

High Court substitutes suspension for disbarment after finding tribunal misapplied exceptional circumstances test.
Court Report30 Jun 2026
Permission for judicial review refused in ATN v WellBN Partnership over GP hormone prescribing
Solicitors Journal

Permission for judicial review refused in ATN v WellBN Partnership over GP hormone prescribing

High Court refuses judicial review of GP practice's discontinued gender-affirming hormone prescribing policy.
Court Report30 Jun 2026
Indemnity costs ordered against trio behind sham trust deeds in Teixeira v Moaven
Solicitors Journal

Indemnity costs ordered against trio behind sham trust deeds in Teixeira v Moaven

High Court orders joint and several indemnity costs over fabricated declarations of trust in estate dispute.
Court Report30 Jun 2026
Court of Appeal refuses Jagjit Kaur's late challenge to contempt committal in Gill v Kaur
Solicitors Journal

Court of Appeal refuses Jagjit Kaur's late challenge to contempt committal in Gill v Kaur

Court of Appeal rejects lengthy extension of time application over deliberate breaches of disclosure orders.
Court Report30 Jun 2026
Privy Council clarifies Mauritius tax exemption test in Alteo Energy ruling
Solicitors Journal

Privy Council clarifies Mauritius tax exemption test in Alteo Energy ruling

Board rejects narrow reading of "core income generating activities" in Mauritius tax exemption dispute.
Court Report30 Jun 2026
Parole Board provides new resources for victims
Solicitors Journal

Parole Board provides new resources for victims

The Parole Board has launched a video and leaflet to assist victims navigating the parole process.
News30 Jun 2026
Dickinson v Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals: Pabrinex failure causes Wernicke's encephalopathy and profound functional disorder, rules High Court
Solicitors Journal

Dickinson v Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals: Pabrinex failure causes Wernicke's encephalopathy and profound functional disorder, rules High Court

NHS trust's admitted failure to administer Vitamin B1 to an alcoholic patient leads to lifelong disability and 24-hour care needs.
Court Report30 Jun 2026
SJ Interview: Chris Spelman
Solicitors Journal

SJ Interview: Chris Spelman

Chris Spelman is a partner in DWF's London dispute resolution team, specialising in financial services litigation and investigations, whistleblowing matters, and class action, securities and...
Interview1 Jun 2026
When the rules can't keep up
Solicitors Journal

When the rules can't keep up

From Westminster to the courts, the rules are being written faster than they can settle
Foreword1 Jun 2026