LoginSubscribe Now
Follow Us
Sign up to our free newsletter
Solicitors Journal LogoInforming the legal profession since 1856

Find the knowledge you need from the SJ library of over 20,000 legal articles

Search now
Solicitors Journal Logo
  • Legal News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Practice Notes
  • Business
  • International
  • Court Reports
  • AI Search
  • Digital Edition
  • Subscription Options
  • Advertise with Us
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • FAQ
    • Guide to Authors
Solicitors Journal

Informing the legal profession since 1856.

Follow us

Topics

  • Legal News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Practice Notes
  • Business
  • International
  • Court Reports

About

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • FAQ
  • Guide to Authors

Subscribe

  • Subscription Options
  • Digital Edition
  • Free Newsletter

Editorial

editorial@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

Subscriptions

subscriptions@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

Advertising

Advertise with usadvertising@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

© 2026 Solicitors Journal in partnership with the International In-house Counsel Journal

ISSN 0038-1047  ·  Images: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors

Terms and ConditionsCookie PolicyPrivacy PolicyPLS Clear logoCopyright & permissions

New evidence supports targeted diversion efforts

31 Jul 2026|News|Add your comment
Share:
New evidence supports targeted diversion efforts

The Youth Justice Board has published a report reinforcing the value of targeted prevention and diversion initiatives for reducing youth crime and promoting safer communities

The recent publication, titled Targeted Prevention and Diversion: Evidence Pack, assembles the latest research and effective practices from across England and Wales to offer a fresh perspective on preventing youth offending. This initiative aligns with the new Government’s proactive approach to early intervention and follows Prime Minister Andy Burnham's commitment to "building a more preventative state" as stated in his inaugural speech.

The evidence pack highlights the importance of a nuanced approach to diversion that prioritises not only the child's needs but also the safety of victims and public protection. This dual focus aims to enhance the consistency and effectiveness of restorative practices in youth justice systems.

Key findings from the report illustrate a significant trend towards diversionary strategies in youth justice. In December 2025, nearly 43% of outcomes processed through youth justice services (YJS) were diversionary, demonstrating a shift away from traditional cautions and court sentences. The data reveals that approximately 13,300 children faced caution or sentencing in 2025, a substantial 65% reduction since 2015, underlining the positive impact of diversion initiatives. Furthermore, first-time entrants into the youth justice system decreased to 8,110 in 2024, marking a 4% decline from the previous year and representing the lowest numbers since 2014.

However, the evidence also uncovers troubling disparities. The likelihood of receiving a diversionary outcome is not uniform; data shows that white children are more likely (53%) to be diverted than their Black counterparts (27%). Additionally, younger children aged 10-14 and girls received higher rates of diversionary outcomes compared to older children and boys.

Geographical differences also emerge, with the percentage of diversionary outcomes varying considerably—from 63% in Wales to as low as 17% in London. This geographic inconsistency highlights the need for standardised policies and practices to ensure that all children, regardless of their background or location, can access the necessary support.

Despite the challenges, there is a clear trajectory of progress. The National Police Chiefs’ Council has recently reinforced the value of diversion within policing frameworks, categorising outcomes into Solved, Resolved, and Unresolved, where diversion activities will be classified as Resolved. This shift in focus aims to reduce unresolved outcomes and enhance the legitimacy of diversion efforts.

“This evidence is indisputable and diverting children away from the formal criminal justice system and into targeted support is the most effective way to reduce reoffending,” said Stephanie Roberts-Bibby, Chief Executive of the Youth Justice Board. She added that partnering with the Ministry of Justice and the Youth Endowment Fund helps strengthen understanding and consistency in delivering effective diversion strategies.

Access to the Targeted Prevention and Diversion: Evidence Pack is now available, providing essential guidance for practitioners committed to implementing innovative and effective approaches across England and Wales. The overarching goal remains clear: to improve outcomes for children, support victims, and ultimately cultivate safer communities.

Comments

Latest Articles

The recent publication, titled Targeted Prevention and Diversion: Evidence Pack, assembles the latest research and effective practices from across England and Wales to offer a fresh perspective on preventing youth offending. This initiative aligns with the new Government’s proactive approach to early intervention and follows Prime Minister Andy Burnham's commitment to "building a more preventative state" as stated in his inaugural speech.

The evidence pack highlights the importance of a nuanced approach to diversion that prioritises not only the child's needs but also the safety of victims and public protection. This dual focus aims to enhance the consistency and effectiveness of restorative practices in youth justice systems.

Key findings from the report illustrate a significant trend towards diversionary strategies in youth justice. In December 2025, nearly 43% of outcomes processed through youth justice services (YJS) were diversionary, demonstrating a shift away from traditional cautions and court sentences. The data reveals that approximately 13,300 children faced caution or sentencing in 2025, a substantial 65% reduction since 2015, underlining the positive impact of diversion initiatives. Furthermore, first-time entrants into the youth justice system decreased to 8,110 in 2024, marking a 4% decline from the previous year and representing the lowest numbers since 2014.

However, the evidence also uncovers troubling disparities. The likelihood of receiving a diversionary outcome is not uniform; data shows that white children are more likely (53%) to be diverted than their Black counterparts (27%). Additionally, younger children aged 10-14 and girls received higher rates of diversionary outcomes compared to older children and boys.

Geographical differences also emerge, with the percentage of diversionary outcomes varying considerably—from 63% in Wales to as low as 17% in London. This geographic inconsistency highlights the need for standardised policies and practices to ensure that all children, regardless of their background or location, can access the necessary support.

Despite the challenges, there is a clear trajectory of progress. The National Police Chiefs’ Council has recently reinforced the value of diversion within policing frameworks, categorising outcomes into Solved, Resolved, and Unresolved, where diversion activities will be classified as Resolved. This shift in focus aims to reduce unresolved outcomes and enhance the legitimacy of diversion efforts.

“This evidence is indisputable and diverting children away from the formal criminal justice system and into targeted support is the most effective way to reduce reoffending,” said Stephanie Roberts-Bibby, Chief Executive of the Youth Justice Board. She added that partnering with the Ministry of Justice and the Youth Endowment Fund helps strengthen understanding and consistency in delivering effective diversion strategies.

Access to the Targeted Prevention and Diversion: Evidence Pack is now available, providing essential guidance for practitioners committed to implementing innovative and effective approaches across England and Wales. The overarching goal remains clear: to improve outcomes for children, support victims, and ultimately cultivate safer communities.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|PLS LogoCopyright & permissions
Can the SFO restore its credibility?
Solicitors Journal

Can the SFO restore its credibility?

Recent successes cannot obscure the operational failures continuing to undermine the Serious Fraud Office’s credibility in complex cases
Business31 Jul 2026
UN urges UK to end IPP sentences
Solicitors Journal

UN urges UK to end IPP sentences

The United Nations has deemed the UK government's IPP sentences arbitrary and called for immediate investigations into longstanding injustices
News31 Jul 2026
Commercial Court rules on aircraft leasing indemnities in FW Aviation v VietJet third trial
Solicitors Journal

Commercial Court rules on aircraft leasing indemnities in FW Aviation v VietJet third trial

Commercial Court narrows VietJet's liability for aircraft repossession costs following Vietnamese airline's lease default.
Court Report31 Jul 2026
High Court dismisses employer liability claim over Storm Eunice death in White v Hooke Highways
Solicitors Journal

High Court dismisses employer liability claim over Storm Eunice death in White v Hooke Highways

High Court rules employer not liable for road worker's death from falling tree during Storm Eunice.
Court Report31 Jul 2026
High Court quashes planning refusal in Greystoke CB v Secretary of State over highways policy error
Solicitors Journal

High Court quashes planning refusal in Greystoke CB v Secretary of State over highways policy error

High Court quashes refusal of Banbury employment scheme after inspector misapplied national highways policy.
Court Report31 Jul 2026
High Court dismisses extradition appeal in Jeremjan v District Court in Jihlava
Solicitors Journal

High Court dismisses extradition appeal in Jeremjan v District Court in Jihlava

High Court upholds Czech extradition despite failed Austrian request and multi-year delay in reissuing warrant.
Court Report31 Jul 2026
High Court dismisses Afghan relocation challenge in R (CGM) v Secretary of State for Defence
Solicitors Journal

High Court dismisses Afghan relocation challenge in R (CGM) v Secretary of State for Defence

High Court upholds MoD decision refusing relocation to an Afghan security guard following 2022 data breach.
Court Report31 Jul 2026
Court of Appeal rejects compelling reasons test for striking out stalled claims in Blackberry v Optiemus
Solicitors Journal

Court of Appeal rejects compelling reasons test for striking out stalled claims in Blackberry v Optiemus

Court of Appeal clarifies when courts may strike out claims left dormant for years, rejecting a rigid legal test.
Court Report31 Jul 2026
Court of Appeal allows fraud-tainted judgement to be set aside against innocent receiver in Lindsay v Outlook Finance
Solicitors Journal

Court of Appeal allows fraud-tainted judgement to be set aside against innocent receiver in Lindsay v Outlook Finance

Court of Appeal rules a judgement procured by one party's fraud can be set aside against a non-fraudulent co-defendant.
Court Report31 Jul 2026
Court of Appeal narrows damages in Next Generation Holdings v Finch client money fraud case
Solicitors Journal

Court of Appeal narrows damages in Next Generation Holdings v Finch client money fraud case

Court of Appeal cuts damages award after finding trading losses were not directly caused by directors' fraud.
Court Report31 Jul 2026
High Court dismisses challenge to Chinese embassy planning permission at Royal Mint Court
Solicitors Journal

High Court dismisses challenge to Chinese embassy planning permission at Royal Mint Court

High Court rejects residents' legal challenge to planning consent for China's new London embassy.
Court Report31 Jul 2026
High Court grants Oxfordshire County Council injunction over unauthorised flag campaign
Solicitors Journal

High Court grants Oxfordshire County Council injunction over unauthorised flag campaign

High Court grants injunction against named individuals and persons unknown over unauthorised flag affixing on highways.
Court Report31 Jul 2026
SJ Interview: Hannah Field
Solicitors Journal

SJ Interview: Hannah Field

Hannah Field, head of Shoosmiths’ London office and its Dispute Resolution & Litigation team in London, speaks to Solicitors Journal about the firm’s growth strategy,...
Interview28 Jul 2026
Matters of judgement
Solicitors Journal

Matters of judgement

Foreword1 Jul 2026