Meysan Partners transforms client onboarding with AML software

19 Apr 2024News

By installing AML software, Meysan Partners achieved a remarkable feat – reducing the client onboarding process from hours to a mere 30 minutes, marking an eightfold increase in efficiency

AML compliance is a very time consuming, but essential process to undertake wherever you are operating in the world. The key, is to undertake the compliance procedures efficiently, effectively and speedily to ensure that clients are not excessively billed and their cases are handled within a reasonable time frame. Meysan Partners, an international law firm headquartered in the Middle East with a burgeoning presence in the United Kingdom, has undertaken a transformative journey in client onboarding

Meysan Partners has always stood at the forefront of legal excellence, boasting a team of leading professionals dedicated to delivering exceptional outcomes in deals and disputes. However, like many firms navigating the complexities of global regulations, they faced challenges in the onboarding process, particularly concerning anti-money laundering (AML) compliance.

Before the adoption of AML software, Meysan Partners grappled with a fragmented onboarding system, characterised by manual workflows and disparate tools. The need for a comprehensive solution that could seamlessly integrate with their practice management system became increasingly apparent as the firm expanded its footprint, culminating in the opening of its London office.

The impact of this transformation cannot be overstated. Ghassan Badran, Meysan Partners' MLRO, emphasises the significance of meticulous customer due diligence and the demand from international clientele for robust compliance measures.

The AML software, equipped with corporate structure visualisation and bespoke risk assessment tools, empowered Meysan Partners to standardise AML risk approaches across all jurisdictions seamlessly. This was particularly crucial in navigating the unique KYC challenges prevalent in the Gulf region, where certified document collection is imperative due to the absence of comprehensive public registers.

The supplier of the AML software, highlights the importance of education on customer due diligence and KYC in the Gulf region, a sentiment echoed by Meysan Partners' commitment to compliance excellence. Together, they are pioneering compliance standards in the region, freeing up valuable time for Meysan Partners to focus on value-adding tasks while ensuring peace of mind with the AML solution.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Employment tribunal cases rising sharply

Recent Ministry of Justice figures reveal a significant increase in open Employment Tribunal cases and challenges faced by employers

SRA updates guidance for litigation supervision

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has enhanced its supervision guidelines to clarify litigation conduct after recent court rulings

Millions of fathers lack parental responsibility

Many fathers may be surprised to learn about their parental responsibility rights and how to secure them

Re Poundstretcher: cross-class cramdown survives even when six landlord classes say no

The Chancery Division sanctions Poundstretcher's restructuring plan despite six dissenting landlord classes, applying the Adler and Petrofac framework.

Ponsford v Sali: a property partnership's messy divorce shows why documentation wins partnership disputes

The Chancery Division takes a pragmatic, evidence based approach to untangling a property partnership built on undocumented cash dealings.

North Somerset District Council v Secretary of State: failing the flood sequential test is not the end of the story

The Planning Court confirms that a failed flood risk sequential test still gets weighed in the planning balance, not treated as an automatic refusal.

Thomas Armstrong (Aggregates) v Housing Secretary: when landfill buries a quarry's right to be reviewed

The Planning Court applies Pilkington and Hillside to find a 1954 quarry permission can no longer be revived under the ROMP regime.

Clerkenwell Lifestyle v HG Construction: be careful what you call "agreed" in extension of time correspondence

The TCC enforces a £955,943 adjudication award after rejecting a contractor's late attempt to recast email exchanges as a binding settlement.

Ward v Donnellan: when both sides lie, "no order for costs" is not a free pass

The Court of Appeal overturns a no order for costs ruling, finding a judge let a dishonest claimant off too lightly.

London Borough of Camden v BW: when a single missing fact can decide a capacity case

The Court of Protection finds an expert's failure to explore one consequence, losing a placement, was enough to undermine his capacity assessment.

Griffiths v Essex County Council: EAT clarifies causation in discrimination remedy awards and sends pension loss back for recalculation

A single act of indirect disability discrimination can ground a full loss of earnings award, even where a later constructive dismissal claim was framed only...