Leading your firm through a change management programme

Delivering a change programme for their firms may not come naturally to lawyers but in the current climate they have little choice but to shake up their approach, says Julian Summerhayes
Love it or hate it, there is no escaping the pressing need to deliver meaningful change. But change is not, and never has been, an easy bedfellow for the legal profession. For a long time, every senior practitioner, almost as badge of honour, was heard to say 'Not on my watch.' And while it is easy to decry the perceived lack of ambition with a period of stasis, who would blame any business owner for not wanting to embrace any more change than was absolutely necessary when the business model was delivering predictable profits?
But, of course, save for the chosen few, we know that the halcyon days are long gone '“ if the dire market hasn't fuelled the need to deliver a change programme then the oversupply of lawyers has meant partners thinking much harder about how to retain their clients and develop a more client friendly operation.
Long-term health
For me, change is much more than moving (constructively) from point 'A' to point 'B'. It means seizing the initiative and having the confidence and self-belief to ensure that you set a sail that is focused on the long-term health of the enterprise.
Too often change is predicated on what lies immediately at hand, and that is perfectly understandable when you have set up the expectation that profits will continue unabated and inexorably upwards. But clients are more fickle these days, and the competition more aggressive. In any event, focusing only on the money is a sure way to set up a rearguard action where everyone is looking out for their own turf, rather than, as should be case, the collective.
The question though is how many ?people feel equipped to manage a ?change programme that goes to the core ?of the business? And, importantly, can deliver change that has a positive impact ?on the firm?
Progression in most firms is painfully slow. It is based on a few tried and tested components, and some would say more luck than judgment.
With the increased specialism that has proliferated, everyone now focuses on acquiring a bushel of technical skills, a few directory listings and, hopefully, lots of client testimonials. This is no different to the brain surgeon who works at his/her craft to become the best in the business. But along the way how few people acquire the technical competency, gravitas or leadership credentials to manage a change programme, particularly when it may not even be in the same area of expertise (can a private client lawyer manage change in dispute resolution?)? Of course, there will some people who are naturally adroit when it comes to leading from the front, but, for most partners, they will have to make it up as they go along.
Leadership is critical in any change process and not just the top down mantra, but rather empowering everyone to lead. In the old days, you would see this described as 'self-starter', meaning someone who didn't need the constant carrot and stick so favoured by the Old School. But a leader without title is someone who feels secure in their position to go out and make a difference without constantly having to seek approval for their actions. This is not to foster an air where mavericks rule the roost but trusting to your fee earners that they will do the right thing by the firm.

.jpg&w=3840&q=60)


![Re Beth [2026] EWFC 156 (B): Family Court identifies perpetrator of non-accidental injuries in infant fact-finding proceedings](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.iicj.net%2Farticle%2Ffeature%2FSwindon_%2C_The_Law_Courts_.jpg&w=3840&q=60)
![The Local Authority v The Mother [2026] EWFC 166 (B): Resolutions assessment refused and special guardianship order made in non-accidental injury proceedings](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.iicj.net%2Farticle%2Ffeature%2FThe_Royal_Courts_of_Justice_-_geograph.org.uk_-_2952836.jpg&w=3840&q=60)








