LoginSubscribe Now
Follow Us
Sign up to our free newsletter
Solicitors Journal LogoInforming the legal profession since 1856

Find the knowledge you need from the SJ library of over 20,000 legal articles

Search now
Solicitors Journal Logo
  • Legal News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Practice Notes
  • Business
  • International
  • Court Reports
  • AI Search
  • Digital Edition
  • Subscription Options
  • Advertise with Us
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • FAQ
    • Guide to Authors
Solicitors Journal

Informing the legal profession since 1856.

Follow us

Topics

  • Legal News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Practice Notes
  • Business
  • International
  • Court Reports

About

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • FAQ
  • Guide to Authors

Subscribe

  • Subscription Options
  • Digital Edition
  • Free Newsletter

Editorial

editorial@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

Subscriptions

subscriptions@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

Advertising

Advertise with usadvertising@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

© 2026 Solicitors Journal in partnership with the International In-house Counsel Journal

ISSN 0038-1047  ·  Images: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors

Terms and ConditionsCookie PolicyPrivacy PolicyPLS Clear logoCopyright & permissions
Law News Law News

Law Firm Demands Transparency Surrounding Bank Account Closures In Order to Protect Consumer Rights

13 Sept 2023|News|Add your comment
Share:
Law Firm Demands Transparency Surrounding Bank Account Closures In Order to Protect Consumer Rights

By Law News

Petition to require banks to give a specific, contestable reason before closing an account

Over the past few weeks, UK law firm Setfords has been carefully monitoring the turbulence between banks and innocent people affected by erroneous ‘fraud markers’. Now, Jeremy Asher, Senior Consultant Regulatory Solicitor, is demanding transparency from banks about account closures in order to protect consumer rights.

In a petition launched this week, he is calling on Nikhil Rathi, CEO of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to intervene and require banks and other financial organisations to adopt a clear and transparent code of conduct regarding the process of shutting down customers' bank accounts, commonly known as ‘debanking’.

Furthermore, Jeremy is also calling on Chancellor of the Exchequer Jeremy Hunt and the Government to extend the FCA's regulatory remit to include oversight of the activities of the fraud marker database operators - who are Cifas, Synectics Solutions and National Hunter.

In the past year, 340,000 bank accounts have been closed without explanation. These Fraud marker database operators currently operate in an unregulated way, offering little or no transparency of their activities, with no straightforward route for challenge or redress for people who are not guilty of any wrongdoing. The current lack of transparency surrounding debanking practices has left countless individuals vulnerable to arbitrary account closures without valid explanation or recourse. This not only disrupts people's financial stability, but also leads many individuals into financial distress and undermines their trust in the banking system as a whole. 

One significant issue contributing to unjust debanking actions is the reliance on fraud markers, such as Cifas, which can be loaded against an individual without their knowledge or consent. These markers often stem from mistaken identity or incorrectly interpreted information that may only come to light several years later, leading innocent customers to suffer severe consequences without any opportunity for redress. A survey conducted by Consumer Action Law Centre revealed that 62% of respondents who had experienced debanking felt they were treated unfairly during the process. The absence of clear guidelines allows some banks to shut down accounts based on subjective criteria, leading to potential discrimination against certain individuals or communities.

By implementing a clear code of conduct enforced by the FCA, we can ensure that banks are obligated to provide detailed explanations when closing accounts, adhere to strict guidelines when loading markers, and ensure that all the fraud databases provide affected individuals with an arbitration system of appeal and publish the standard of proof they expect the banks to work to. This will promote fairness and transparency and protect innocent customers from undue harm caused by erroneous fraud markers.

Jeremy Asher says “For the past few weeks, I have been waging a campaign in the media that highlights how Cifas and other fraud markers, which have been wrongly applied by banks and other financial institutions, are seriously impacting the lives of innocent people.  My day-to-day legal work as a Solicitor at law firm Setfords involves helping people in that unfortunate position to get these markers removed.   

“In recent weeks, due to the ongoing national media publicity surrounding ‘debanking,’ my case work has dramatically increased with hundreds of consumers reaching out for my help. There is an invisible crisis in the UK banking and financial industry that is impacting innocent people, and it requires urgent action and intervention from the FCA and Government in conjunction.

“The problem I am trying to solve is to stop risk-averse financial organisations from relying too heavily on technology, specifically artificial intelligence (AI), in order to make decisions that can have a disastrous impact on a person’s life, work and financial opportunities.

“There needs to be sensible human involvement in the process that can override the ‘computer says no’ mentality that is quickly settling into the decision-making processes, as has been demonstrated in recent publicity.”

Jeremy and Setfords are calling on the FCA to take immediate action and enforce a transparent code of conduct for banks and the fraud marker databases, ensuring that customers are provided with clear explanations and avenues for appeal when their accounts are closed.

By doing so, trust can be restored in the banking system and innocent individuals can be protected from unjust debanking actions.

Comments

Latest Articles

Over the past few weeks, UK law firm Setfords has been carefully monitoring the turbulence between banks and innocent people affected by erroneous ‘fraud markers’. Now, Jeremy Asher, Senior Consultant Regulatory Solicitor, is demanding transparency from banks about account closures in order to protect consumer rights.

In a petition launched this week, he is calling on Nikhil Rathi, CEO of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to intervene and require banks and other financial organisations to adopt a clear and transparent code of conduct regarding the process of shutting down customers' bank accounts, commonly known as ‘debanking’.

Furthermore, Jeremy is also calling on Chancellor of the Exchequer Jeremy Hunt and the Government to extend the FCA's regulatory remit to include oversight of the activities of the fraud marker database operators - who are Cifas, Synectics Solutions and National Hunter.

In the past year, 340,000 bank accounts have been closed without explanation. These Fraud marker database operators currently operate in an unregulated way, offering little or no transparency of their activities, with no straightforward route for challenge or redress for people who are not guilty of any wrongdoing. The current lack of transparency surrounding debanking practices has left countless individuals vulnerable to arbitrary account closures without valid explanation or recourse. This not only disrupts people's financial stability, but also leads many individuals into financial distress and undermines their trust in the banking system as a whole. 

One significant issue contributing to unjust debanking actions is the reliance on fraud markers, such as Cifas, which can be loaded against an individual without their knowledge or consent. These markers often stem from mistaken identity or incorrectly interpreted information that may only come to light several years later, leading innocent customers to suffer severe consequences without any opportunity for redress. A survey conducted by Consumer Action Law Centre revealed that 62% of respondents who had experienced debanking felt they were treated unfairly during the process. The absence of clear guidelines allows some banks to shut down accounts based on subjective criteria, leading to potential discrimination against certain individuals or communities.

By implementing a clear code of conduct enforced by the FCA, we can ensure that banks are obligated to provide detailed explanations when closing accounts, adhere to strict guidelines when loading markers, and ensure that all the fraud databases provide affected individuals with an arbitration system of appeal and publish the standard of proof they expect the banks to work to. This will promote fairness and transparency and protect innocent customers from undue harm caused by erroneous fraud markers.

Jeremy Asher says “For the past few weeks, I have been waging a campaign in the media that highlights how Cifas and other fraud markers, which have been wrongly applied by banks and other financial institutions, are seriously impacting the lives of innocent people.  My day-to-day legal work as a Solicitor at law firm Setfords involves helping people in that unfortunate position to get these markers removed.   

“In recent weeks, due to the ongoing national media publicity surrounding ‘debanking,’ my case work has dramatically increased with hundreds of consumers reaching out for my help. There is an invisible crisis in the UK banking and financial industry that is impacting innocent people, and it requires urgent action and intervention from the FCA and Government in conjunction.

“The problem I am trying to solve is to stop risk-averse financial organisations from relying too heavily on technology, specifically artificial intelligence (AI), in order to make decisions that can have a disastrous impact on a person’s life, work and financial opportunities.

“There needs to be sensible human involvement in the process that can override the ‘computer says no’ mentality that is quickly settling into the decision-making processes, as has been demonstrated in recent publicity.”

Jeremy and Setfords are calling on the FCA to take immediate action and enforce a transparent code of conduct for banks and the fraud marker databases, ensuring that customers are provided with clear explanations and avenues for appeal when their accounts are closed.

By doing so, trust can be restored in the banking system and innocent individuals can be protected from unjust debanking actions.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|PLS LogoCopyright & permissions
Why AI governance for lawyers needs judgement, not rules
Solicitors Journal

Why AI governance for lawyers needs judgement, not rules

Static AI policies fail legal teams; cultivating professional judgement is what actually reduces risk while capturing AI's competitive advantage
Business26 Jun 2026
A fairer end? Navigating the new cohabitation proposals
Solicitors Journal

A fairer end? Navigating the new cohabitation proposals

The Ministry of Justice's landmark consultation promises vital baseline protections, but creates a complex, highly contested landscape for family practitioners
Opinion26 Jun 2026
High Court rules on Ford Dieselgate claims
Solicitors Journal

High Court rules on Ford Dieselgate claims

The High Court has allowed amendments to the Dieselgate claims against Ford, enhancing consumer litigation rights
News26 Jun 2026
Re Beth [2026] EWFC 156 (B): Family Court identifies perpetrator of non-accidental injuries in infant fact-finding proceedings
Solicitors Journal

Re Beth [2026] EWFC 156 (B): Family Court identifies perpetrator of non-accidental injuries in infant fact-finding proceedings

HHJ Case finds Intervenor caused femoral fracture and bruising to infant in sole care; threshold met against mother.
Court Report26 Jun 2026
The Local Authority v The Mother [2026] EWFC 166 (B): Resolutions assessment refused and special guardianship order made in non-accidental injury proceedings
Solicitors Journal

The Local Authority v The Mother [2026] EWFC 166 (B): Resolutions assessment refused and special guardianship order made in non-accidental injury proceedings

HHJ Hesford refuses Resolutions assessment and makes SGO for paternal grandparents in NAI care proceedings.
Court Report26 Jun 2026
PSA v General Dental Council and Rahman: six-month suspension quashed in dentist sexual misconduct appeal
Solicitors Journal

PSA v General Dental Council and Rahman: six-month suspension quashed in dentist sexual misconduct appeal

Sweeting J allows PSA appeal after finding Committee failed to evaluate repeated sexual misconduct holistically.
Court Report26 Jun 2026
Musst Holdings v Astra Asset Management: ATE premiums and litigation funding fees not recoverable as damages
Solicitors Journal

Musst Holdings v Astra Asset Management: ATE premiums and litigation funding fees not recoverable as damages

Leech J dismisses novel claim to recover ATE premiums and litigation funding fees as damages.
Court Report26 Jun 2026
A1 v Home Secretary: Court of Appeal allows revocation appeal in terrorism refugee status case
Solicitors Journal

A1 v Home Secretary: Court of Appeal allows revocation appeal in terrorism refugee status case

Singh LJ finds logical inconsistency in FTT's section 72 danger assessment; case remitted for redetermination.
Court Report26 Jun 2026
High Court refuses Tate brothers permission for judicial review over complainants' identity disclosure
Solicitors Journal

High Court refuses Tate brothers permission for judicial review over complainants' identity disclosure

Chamberlain J finds neither irrationality nor Article 6 breach arguable in extradition disclosure challenge.
Court Report26 Jun 2026
Wild Justice v Natural England: High Court refuses advisory declaration in badger cull licensing challenge
Solicitors Journal

Wild Justice v Natural England: High Court refuses advisory declaration in badger cull licensing challenge

High Court rejects environmental NGOs' bid for hypothetical guidance on badger cull licensing irrelevancies.
Court Report26 Jun 2026
High Court makes declaration of parentage against former BATUK soldier in Re YZ DNA case
Solicitors Journal

High Court makes declaration of parentage against former BATUK soldier in Re YZ DNA case

DNA evidence proving 99.9999999% paternity probability defeats respondent's challenge to chain of evidence.
Court Report26 Jun 2026
R (EXR) v Home Secretary: High Court rules reasonableness governs age assessments for UK-France Treaty removals
Solicitors Journal

R (EXR) v Home Secretary: High Court rules reasonableness governs age assessments for UK-France Treaty removals

High Court rules reasonableness standard governs SSHD age decisions for UK-France Treaty removals. 
Court Report26 Jun 2026
Sentencing guidelines updated after consultation
Solicitors Journal

Sentencing guidelines updated after consultation

The Sentencing Council has announced amendments to sentencing guidelines following an annual consultation that received 76 responses, with changes coming into effect on 13 July...
News26 Jun 2026
SJ Interview: Chris Spelman
Solicitors Journal

SJ Interview: Chris Spelman

Chris Spelman is a partner in DWF's London dispute resolution team, specialising in financial services litigation and investigations, whistleblowing matters, and class action, securities and...
Interview1 Jun 2026
When the rules can't keep up
Solicitors Journal

When the rules can't keep up

From Westminster to the courts, the rules are being written faster than they can settle
Foreword1 Jun 2026