Editor, Solicitors Journal

JUDICIAL SHAMPOO

5 Jan 2019News

93 senior judges made 2,467 approved claims for expenses last year after payments had been made for crockery and a taxi journey to transport ceremonial robes. The crockery was acquired so that the judge could give tea and coffee when hosting meetings. One judge claimed £5 for shampoo. A spokesman for the judiciary said it was not unreasonable for anybody who was working away from home for a long period to spend a small amount on toiletries. The Ministry of Justice is finalising a new expenses policy for senior judges. 18 May 2019

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com

Latest Articles

Post-Ukraine surrogacy and cross-border legal risk

As intended parents move beyond Ukraine, courts are confronting increasingly complex ethical, legal and public policy tensions

Unapproved AI use is widespread in UK law firms

New research reveals the alarming prevalence of unapproved AI tools among UK legal professionals highlighting regulatory challenges ahead

AI can enhance law firms' processes

AI accelerates legal work efficiency but requires rigorous human oversight to maintain accountability and reliability in outcomes

GMC v Grajn: High Court quashes MPT suspension after finding serious under-prosecution

All MPT determinations quashed; fresh tribunal hearing ordered following failure to allege dishonesty against transplant surgeon

DHL v Ignatowicz: EAT remits reinstatement and contributory fault findings over Facebook dismissal

Employment Appeal Tribunal clarifies key principles on contributory conduct and reinstatement.

Solong v Samskip: High Court rules on "such loss" in landmark limitation judgement

Owners entitled to limit liability after Humber collision; Article 4 defence struck out

Fay of London v Axis Specialty Europe: High Court clarifies amendment rules where limitation defence is in play

A claimant cannot sidestep limitation arguments by framing an amendment application under CPR r.17.1 rather than r.17.4, the High Court has confirmed.

Verum Plus v Petroineos: Swiss insolvency assignees win joinder bid but blocked on contract claims

Swiss Article 260 assignees gain standing to pursue English litigation, but non-assignment clauses bar them from the underlying contracts.

Soundwave Studios v Visage Cinema: High Court sets aside statutory demand over total failure of consideration dispute

Restitutionary debt claim against music production company found to raise genuine and substantial dispute

ITH Group v Environment Agency: tribunal halves ESOS penalty after finding non-receipt claims insufficient to rebut service presumption

A healthcare group's civil penalty under the Energy Savings Opportunity Scheme has been reduced from £33,750 to £16,875 after the First-tier Tribunal found the Environment...

JUDICIAL SHAMPOO

Post-Ukraine surrogacy and cross-border legal risk

Unapproved AI use is widespread in UK law firms

AI can enhance law firms' processes

GMC v Grajn: High Court quashes MPT suspension after finding serious under-prosecution

DHL v Ignatowicz: EAT remits reinstatement and contributory fault findings over Facebook dismissal

Solong v Samskip: High Court rules on "such loss" in landmark limitation judgement

Fay of London v Axis Specialty Europe: High Court clarifies amendment rules where limitation defence is in play

Verum Plus v Petroineos: Swiss insolvency assignees win joinder bid but blocked on contract claims

Soundwave Studios v Visage Cinema: High Court sets aside statutory demand over total failure of consideration dispute

ITH Group v Environment Agency: tribunal halves ESOS penalty after finding non-receipt claims insufficient to rebut service presumption

Regulator faces surge in misconduct reports

Government launches crackdown on late payments

Cohen v Co-Operative Group: High Court dismisses £205m insolvency challenge over Project Chicago restructure

SJ Interview: Keith Froud

Navigating the accountability gap in a transformed legal landscape