Sign up to our free newsletter
Follow Us
LoginSubscribe Now
Solicitors Journal LogoInforming the legal profession since 1856
Solicitors Journal Logo
  • Legal News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Practice Notes
  • Business
  • International
  • Court Reports
  • AI Search
  • Digital Edition
  • Subscription Options
  • Advertise with Us
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • FAQ
    • Guide to Authors
Solicitors Journal

Informing the legal profession since 1856.

Follow us

Topics

  • Legal News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Practice Notes
  • Business
  • International
  • Court Reports

About

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • FAQ
  • Guide to Authors

Subscribe

  • Subscription Options
  • Digital Edition
  • Free Newsletter

Editorial

editorial@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

Subscriptions

subscriptions@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

Advertising

Advertise with usadvertising@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

© 2026 Solicitors Journal in partnership with the International In-house Counsel Journal | ISSN 0038-1047 | Images: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors

Terms and ConditionsCookie PolicyPrivacy PolicyPLS Clear logoCopyright & permissions
Viv WilliamsViv Williams

Consultant, Viv Williams Consulting

How your people dictate 'your future direction

10 Nov 2015Feature
Share:
How your people dictate 'your future direction

By Viv Williams

Hiring staff who will fit into the model you want your business to follow is critical to sustaining growth, believes Viv Williams

We are all aware that succession is a huge issue, but planning your future direction early will be the recipe for a successful outcome to this dilemma.

We have seen a few failures ?in recent weeks, with more to come. Some say consolidation ?is inevitable for many firms, but are they mergeable? Becoming ?a successor practice has stopped many mergers in their tracks, and your solution may well be based on retaining your independence.

With a thousand or so firms no longer able to deliver criminal legal aid, there are questions about their sustainability. ?If this represented only a small part of their practice, then retraining some staff will be ?an essential exercise.

This is why the people you have in your practice could well dictate your future direction.

When planning the future for your practice, deciding on your business model should encourage you to consider your future direction. If we accept that a firm wishes to continue offering a commoditised service, then accepting who will deliver the work in the future will be an essential part of your decision-making strategy.

The alternative is learning ?to charge a premium price ?for your services and dropping many services that are no ?longer profitable.

The models are both ?distinct and measurable, and both can work.

Business models

The firms providing client-led hourly charged services will need to charge a premium for their time. Clients will expect excellent client care and service – after all, that’s what they are paying for. In this model, the firm’s owners or partners actually win and deliver the work through their reputation. 

This model represents the shape of an hourglass, with ?a partner or fee earner being supported by one or two members of a team to deliver exceptional service and ?charge a premium price for ?that service.

On the other hand, ?those firms that choose the commoditised route must process the service and allow for the de-skilling of the people involved. This does not mean a reduction in customer care, but it does mean paying the right people to do the work. Partners and experienced fee earners should not be involved in ?any way other than winning ?the work through good relationships and managing ?the team of people that can deliver the work at a price you can afford. 

This model represents a pyramid and should work on the basis that one owner or partner manages a ratio of ten people to one supervisor. This allows you to use software that drives production – this can be cloud based, with little capital expenditure. For example, in the operation of a conveyancing department, the software drives the process and automatically activates pre-approved letters and searches, taking the conveyancing process away from individual people.

We must also be aware that the lenders will control which firms eventually remain on their panels and will drive many smaller firms away from conveyancing. Without the ?right technology and sufficient resources, they will find their market share eroding. For surveyors, a software tool called Quest is a prerequisite to being on lender panels, and solicitors firms on lender panels will surely follow the same process.

Each model needs to be established for each department, and running a successful practice in the future will depend on getting each model operating correctly. What you cannot do ?is merge the two models and provide a commoditised, price-driven service delivered by partners and senior fee earners – it will cost you money with every file you open and will be the recipe for failure.

Once you have decided on your model, hire people based on where you want to be, not where you are – the team that can successfully run a £1m practice is not the same team that can run a £20m company.

Putting the right people in the right places is absolutely critical to sustaining growth. Whole person assessments and job benchmarking will allow you to take a systematic approach to hiring and career development, which will reduce employee turnover and, in turn, produce greater profitability.

Take care of your people ?and they will take care of ?your business.

Viv Williams is CEO of 360 Legal Group @360legal www.360legalgroup.co.uk

Related Topics

  • Commercial
  • Business Development and Marketing

Latest Articles

We are all aware that succession is a huge issue, but planning your future direction early will be the recipe for a successful outcome to this dilemma.

We have seen a few failures ?in recent weeks, with more to come. Some say consolidation ?is inevitable for many firms, but are they mergeable? Becoming ?a successor practice has stopped many mergers in their tracks, and your solution may well be based on retaining your independence.

With a thousand or so firms no longer able to deliver criminal legal aid, there are questions about their sustainability. ?If this represented only a small part of their practice, then retraining some staff will be ?an essential exercise.

This is why the people you have in your practice could well dictate your future direction.

When planning the future for your practice, deciding on your business model should encourage you to consider your future direction. If we accept that a firm wishes to continue offering a commoditised service, then accepting who will deliver the work in the future will be an essential part of your decision-making strategy.

The alternative is learning ?to charge a premium price ?for your services and dropping many services that are no ?longer profitable.

The models are both ?distinct and measurable, and both can work.

Business models

The firms providing client-led hourly charged services will need to charge a premium for their time. Clients will expect excellent client care and service – after all, that’s what they are paying for. In this model, the firm’s owners or partners actually win and deliver the work through their reputation. 

This model represents the shape of an hourglass, with ?a partner or fee earner being supported by one or two members of a team to deliver exceptional service and ?charge a premium price for ?that service.

On the other hand, ?those firms that choose the commoditised route must process the service and allow for the de-skilling of the people involved. This does not mean a reduction in customer care, but it does mean paying the right people to do the work. Partners and experienced fee earners should not be involved in ?any way other than winning ?the work through good relationships and managing ?the team of people that can deliver the work at a price you can afford. 

This model represents a pyramid and should work on the basis that one owner or partner manages a ratio of ten people to one supervisor. This allows you to use software that drives production – this can be cloud based, with little capital expenditure. For example, in the operation of a conveyancing department, the software drives the process and automatically activates pre-approved letters and searches, taking the conveyancing process away from individual people.

We must also be aware that the lenders will control which firms eventually remain on their panels and will drive many smaller firms away from conveyancing. Without the ?right technology and sufficient resources, they will find their market share eroding. For surveyors, a software tool called Quest is a prerequisite to being on lender panels, and solicitors firms on lender panels will surely follow the same process.

Each model needs to be established for each department, and running a successful practice in the future will depend on getting each model operating correctly. What you cannot do ?is merge the two models and provide a commoditised, price-driven service delivered by partners and senior fee earners – it will cost you money with every file you open and will be the recipe for failure.

Once you have decided on your model, hire people based on where you want to be, not where you are – the team that can successfully run a £1m practice is not the same team that can run a £20m company.

Putting the right people in the right places is absolutely critical to sustaining growth. Whole person assessments and job benchmarking will allow you to take a systematic approach to hiring and career development, which will reduce employee turnover and, in turn, produce greater profitability.

Take care of your people ?and they will take care of ?your business.

Viv Williams is CEO of 360 Legal Group @360legal www.360legalgroup.co.uk


Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com
PLS LogoCopyright & permissions
SRA intervention powers and challenge threshold
Solicitors Journal

SRA intervention powers and challenge threshold

High Court confirms approach to SRA intervention in IPS Law LLP, highlighting low threshold and procedural constraints
Practice Notes9 Jun 2026
Government's inaction risks litigation funding integrity
Solicitors Journal

Government's inaction risks litigation funding integrity

The ongoing delay in addressing litigation funding reforms threatens the UK’s global standing in dispute resolution
News9 Jun 2026
Government launches initiative to enhance LawTech
Solicitors Journal

Government launches initiative to enhance LawTech

The UK Government’s new AI Growth Labs aim to revolutionise the legal sector by fast-tracking innovation
News9 Jun 2026
Barclays Services Corporation v HMRC: Upper Tribunal dismisses VAT grouping appeal over skeletal UK branch
Solicitors Journal

Barclays Services Corporation v HMRC: Upper Tribunal dismisses VAT grouping appeal over skeletal UK branch

Upper Tribunal upholds HMRC's refusal to admit Delaware corporation to UK VAT group.
Court Report9 Jun 2026
Barclays Bank v HMRC: Upper Tribunal remits reserve capital instruments case over flawed economic reality analysis
Solicitors Journal

Barclays Bank v HMRC: Upper Tribunal remits reserve capital instruments case over flawed economic reality analysis

Upper Tribunal allows Barclays' appeal after finding the FTT committed four errors of law.
Court Report9 Jun 2026
Re AH: High Court stays child return application in favour of Indian courts
Solicitors Journal

Re AH: High Court stays child return application in favour of Indian courts

Court declines jurisdiction despite father's "unconscionable" removal of child from matrimonial home.
Court Report9 Jun 2026
Youth justice reforms prioritise evidence over ideology
Solicitors Journal

Youth justice reforms prioritise evidence over ideology

Government youth justice White Paper leans on early intervention, courts reform and evidence-led “what works” approach
Opinion8 Jun 2026
Parental complaints contributing to staff turnover
Solicitors Journal

Parental complaints contributing to staff turnover

A recent survey reveals a worrying trend as parental complaints impact school staff retention and wellbeing
News8 Jun 2026
ARAG and Purpose Coalition launch report
Solicitors Journal

ARAG and Purpose Coalition launch report

ARAG and The Purpose Coalition introduced Insuring Justice, a report emphasising the importance of legal protection access to justice and opportunity
News8 Jun 2026
Essendi UK Hotels v London Property Company: landlord ordered to reclad Ibis Wembley after ACM cladding found to pose 'intolerable' fire risk
Solicitors Journal

Essendi UK Hotels v London Property Company: landlord ordered to reclad Ibis Wembley after ACM cladding found to pose 'intolerable' fire risk

A hotel landlord bears full responsibility for removing dangerous ACM cladding under lease covenants, the TCC has ruled.
Court Report5 Jun 2026
Tibor Matyas v Peter Daniel: High Court rejects beneficial interest and inheritance claims over London properties
Solicitors Journal

Tibor Matyas v Peter Daniel: High Court rejects beneficial interest and inheritance claims over London properties

Claimant's 1975 Act claim dismissed on three independent grounds following nine-year dispute over fashion designer's estate.
Court Report5 Jun 2026
Askan v HM Land Registry: High Court strikes out claim built on a fundamental misreading of registered title
Solicitors Journal

Askan v HM Land Registry: High Court strikes out claim built on a fundamental misreading of registered title

A litigant in person's attempt to expand his registered title through the courts has been comprehensively dismissed, with the High Court granting reverse summary judgement...
Court Report5 Jun 2026
Court of Appeal overturns strike-out in Magic Investments SA v Broadbent unfair prejudice dispute
Solicitors Journal

Court of Appeal overturns strike-out in Magic Investments SA v Broadbent unfair prejudice dispute

Minority shareholder's petition reinstated after appeal court rules on board nomination rights and share issuance.
Court Report5 Jun 2026
SJ Interview: Paul Marco
Solicitors Journal

SJ Interview: Paul Marco

Paul Marco, Managing Partner of Trowers & Hamlins, speaks to Solicitors Journal
Interview26 May 2026
When the rules can't keep up
Solicitors Journal

When the rules can't keep up

From Westminster to the courts, the rules are being written faster than they can settle
Foreword1 Jun 2026