Editor, Solicitors Journal

Give me a break

1 Feb 2016News

A second-year law student has demanded a lifetime supply of KitKats after she found multiple bars without the signature wafer inside.

Less than a fortnight after losing its battle to trade mark the shape of its iconic chocolate, Nestlé may be heading back to court.

King's College undergraduate Saima Ahmad, 20, has threatened legal action, claiming the chocolate manufacturer ignored its duty of care to consumers.

In a letter to Nestlé, KitKat super-fan Ahmad said she had suffered 'monetary and emotional' loss after the company's failure to 'take due care in the manufacturing process resulted in a product being defective'.

'I feel as though I have been misled to part with my money and purchase a product that is clearly different from what has been marketed by Nestlé,' she added.

The student requested a supply of her favourite chocolate so she could 'act as a means of quality control'.

Ahmad is not the first fan to suffer the wafer-less bar. The student found a 'few forums online' where people complain of buying KitKats without wafers.

Clearly disappointed by the situation, Ahmad said Nestlé's mistakes were unacceptable, and she hoped the manufacturer would apologise and place more focus on the quality of its product in the future.

'No one else in that industry has that unique concept about mixing the wafer with the chocolate and that's why I'm a fan,' she said.

Looking ahead, Ahmad hoped to hear from the company's CEO but remained adamant she would take action if Nestlé failed to meet her demands.

'I wouldn't rule out taking this further if Nestlé do not apologise or compensate me adequately.'

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com

Latest Articles

When pets become a family law issue

As pet ownership rises, family law struggles to reconcile animals’ sentience with their continued treatment as property

Shipping cartel settlement approved for consumers

The Competition Appeal Tribunal has finalised a £92.75 million settlement for affected vehicle purchasers

Consultation launched for housing offences

The Sentencing Council is inviting public input on new sentencing guidelines for housing offences

Abraaj Investment Management v Kes Power: Commercial estoppel and the assignment of receivables

High Court validates security assignment despite technical flaws through estoppel by convention principles.

Director of Public Prosecutions v Boureanu: Confiscation orders and the meaning of conviction

Romanian confiscation order enforced despite limitation preventing custodial sentence following corruption conviction.

Odusanya v Pennine Care Foundation Trust: witness evidence discussions and the right to representation

Strike-out appeal partially allowed where claimant denied consultation with representative during proceedings.

Smithstone v Tranmoor Primary School: Court of Appeal clarifies Part 36 costs in settled claims

90:10 liability offers viable but require actual determination to trigger enhanced costs

Network Rail Infrastructure Limited v Karl List: Advertising rights and railway hereditaments

Court of Appeal clarifies rating liability for advertising sites within operational railway stations under business rates legislation.

Cubic Transportation Systems v Transport for London: High Court lifts automatic suspension in £800m procurement challenge

TfL revenue collection contract dispute demonstrates adequacy of damages in major infrastructure procurement challenges.

Ioan Mailat v Hunedoara City Court: European arrest warrant particularisation requirements

High Court clarifies when missing offence details constitute wholesale failure in conviction warrants

High Court allows trial against Dyson

A High Court ruling sets the stage for a trial next year regarding claims against Dyson companies

Home Secretary gains power to dismiss chief constables

Under the new laws, Home Secretaries will gain statutory authority to force the retirement, resignation, or suspension of chief constables based on their performance

Hogan Lovells reveals bribery outlook 2026

Global law firm Hogan Lovells has launched its Bribery, Investigations & Enforcement Outlook report for 2026 focusing on emerging trends in compliance for multinational organizations

Limbu v Dyson: High Court orders liability trial for migrant workers' exploitation claims

Split trial approved over preliminary issues in Malaysian factory conditions case

Phullar v Ofsted: Employment tribunal failures in disability discrimination and unfair dismissal appeal

Dismissal for capability during cancer recovery raised procedural and reasonable adjustment failures throughout.

SJ Interview: Joelle Grogan

Dr Joelle Grogan is a legal scholar specialising in the rule of law in times of crisis. She presents The Law Show on BBC Radio 4, and is Co-Academic Director of the Rule of Law Clinic at the CEU Democracy Institute (Budapest), and a Senior Research Fellow at the UCD Sutherland School of Law. Her work focuses on constitutional accountability, emergency powers, and legal misinformation. In this interview, she examines the pressures facing the rule of law in the UK, from executive power and court delays to media narratives, emergencies, and the impact of AI on legal practice.

Justice reform risks targeting the wrong fix

As 2026 approaches, ministers eye jury trials while ignoring deeper causes of England’s criminal justice crisis