Foot Anstey welcomes five new partners

27 Apr 2026Announcements

Fast-growing national law firm Foot Anstey is thrilled to announce five internal promotions to its partnership effective 1 May 2026, highlighting the firm's commitment to supporting clients across the UK

The recent promotions at Foot Anstey reflect the firm's robust growth strategy in various sectors. With the addition of five new partners, the firm is strengthening its capabilities in Corporate & Private Equity, Energy & Infrastructure, and Real Estate Development. Emma Clayton and Dominic Cromwell will join the partnership focusing on Corporate & Private Equity, while Mark Holloway will specialise in Real Estate Development. Laura Rajanah and Simon Stubbs will enhance the Energy & Infrastructure sector, with their expertise also spanning Commercial Property, Asset Management, Projects, and Construction.

Martin Hirst, the Managing Partner at Foot Anstey, expressed his pride in these promotions, stating, "This year's promotions demonstrate the talent in our firm as we continue to grow with our clients, supporting them across the UK. I am very proud to welcome these outstanding lawyers to our partnership and look forward to their continued success." The inclusion of these talented professionals marks a significant milestone for the firm as it continues to expand its reach and service offerings.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Latest Articles

Employment tribunal cases rising sharply

Recent Ministry of Justice figures reveal a significant increase in open Employment Tribunal cases and challenges faced by employers

SRA updates guidance for litigation supervision

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has enhanced its supervision guidelines to clarify litigation conduct after recent court rulings

Millions of fathers lack parental responsibility

Many fathers may be surprised to learn about their parental responsibility rights and how to secure them

Re Poundstretcher: cross-class cramdown survives even when six landlord classes say no

The Chancery Division sanctions Poundstretcher's restructuring plan despite six dissenting landlord classes, applying the Adler and Petrofac framework.

Ponsford v Sali: a property partnership's messy divorce shows why documentation wins partnership disputes

The Chancery Division takes a pragmatic, evidence based approach to untangling a property partnership built on undocumented cash dealings.

North Somerset District Council v Secretary of State: failing the flood sequential test is not the end of the story

The Planning Court confirms that a failed flood risk sequential test still gets weighed in the planning balance, not treated as an automatic refusal.

Thomas Armstrong (Aggregates) v Housing Secretary: when landfill buries a quarry's right to be reviewed

The Planning Court applies Pilkington and Hillside to find a 1954 quarry permission can no longer be revived under the ROMP regime.

Clerkenwell Lifestyle v HG Construction: be careful what you call "agreed" in extension of time correspondence

The TCC enforces a £955,943 adjudication award after rejecting a contractor's late attempt to recast email exchanges as a binding settlement.

Ward v Donnellan: when both sides lie, "no order for costs" is not a free pass

The Court of Appeal overturns a no order for costs ruling, finding a judge let a dishonest claimant off too lightly.

London Borough of Camden v BW: when a single missing fact can decide a capacity case

The Court of Protection finds an expert's failure to explore one consequence, losing a placement, was enough to undermine his capacity assessment.

Griffiths v Essex County Council: EAT clarifies causation in discrimination remedy awards and sends pension loss back for recalculation

A single act of indirect disability discrimination can ground a full loss of earnings award, even where a later constructive dismissal claim was framed only...