Editor, Solicitors Journal

Do you want a lawsuit with that?

19 Jun 2015News

Apocryphal tales of what really goes into our food are nothing new, especially from our Atlantic cousins

There have been numerous reports of the weird and wonderful entering the fast-food chain, such as deep-fried chicken heads appearing in boxes of McDonald's chicken wings - a 'Chicken McNoggin' if you will - syringes and painkillers in Burger King sandwiches, Band-Aids in slices of Pizza Hut pizza, and even live ammunition in Costco hot dogs.

But the latest in a long line of tall tales, hoaxes, urban legends, and bogus class-action lawsuits, came in the news this week that a California man was served a deep-fried rat at his local branch of KFC.

Devorise Dixon's Facebook post, which shows photographs of what appeared to be a more than average-sized rodent covered in 11 secret herbs and spices, went viral last week.

'As I bit into it I noticed that it was very hard and rubbery which made me look at it. As I looked down at it I noticed that it was in a shape of a rat with a tail. It sent deep chills throughout my whole body! I've been feeling weird ever since,' said Dixon.

Unsurprisingly, Dixon was not one to let deep-fried vermin lie and, apparently, went back to remonstrate with the chicken shop.

'WENT BACK TO KFC YESTERDAY AND SPOKE TO THE MANAGER SHE SAID IT IS A RAT AND APOLOGIZED, IT'S TIME FOR A LAWYER!!! BESAFE DON'T EAT FAST FOOD!!!' (sic)

Considering the spuriousness of some lawsuits that emanate from the US, Dixon's claim that he was to seek legal advice was hardly surprising. Questions started to be asked, however, when it emerged that the young man was refusing to allow KFC to examine the breaded rattus. Was he just protecting his evidence from a corporate vanishing act?

Well, unfortunately for Dixon, it appears the jig is up after the fast food giant issued photos of its questionable meat product which it alleges show that the rat is really just '100 per cent white meat chicken'.

There's no word yet as to whether or not Dixon will need a lawyer to defend him in a supersize defamation proceeding.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com

Latest Articles

When pets become a family law issue

As pet ownership rises, family law struggles to reconcile animals’ sentience with their continued treatment as property

Shipping cartel settlement approved for consumers

The Competition Appeal Tribunal has finalised a £92.75 million settlement for affected vehicle purchasers

Consultation launched for housing offences

The Sentencing Council is inviting public input on new sentencing guidelines for housing offences

Abraaj Investment Management v Kes Power: Commercial estoppel and the assignment of receivables

High Court validates security assignment despite technical flaws through estoppel by convention principles.

Director of Public Prosecutions v Boureanu: Confiscation orders and the meaning of conviction

Romanian confiscation order enforced despite limitation preventing custodial sentence following corruption conviction.

Odusanya v Pennine Care Foundation Trust: witness evidence discussions and the right to representation

Strike-out appeal partially allowed where claimant denied consultation with representative during proceedings.

Smithstone v Tranmoor Primary School: Court of Appeal clarifies Part 36 costs in settled claims

90:10 liability offers viable but require actual determination to trigger enhanced costs

Network Rail Infrastructure Limited v Karl List: Advertising rights and railway hereditaments

Court of Appeal clarifies rating liability for advertising sites within operational railway stations under business rates legislation.

Cubic Transportation Systems v Transport for London: High Court lifts automatic suspension in £800m procurement challenge

TfL revenue collection contract dispute demonstrates adequacy of damages in major infrastructure procurement challenges.

Ioan Mailat v Hunedoara City Court: European arrest warrant particularisation requirements

High Court clarifies when missing offence details constitute wholesale failure in conviction warrants

High Court allows trial against Dyson

A High Court ruling sets the stage for a trial next year regarding claims against Dyson companies

Home Secretary gains power to dismiss chief constables

Under the new laws, Home Secretaries will gain statutory authority to force the retirement, resignation, or suspension of chief constables based on their performance

Hogan Lovells reveals bribery outlook 2026

Global law firm Hogan Lovells has launched its Bribery, Investigations & Enforcement Outlook report for 2026 focusing on emerging trends in compliance for multinational organizations

Limbu v Dyson: High Court orders liability trial for migrant workers' exploitation claims

Split trial approved over preliminary issues in Malaysian factory conditions case

Phullar v Ofsted: Employment tribunal failures in disability discrimination and unfair dismissal appeal

Dismissal for capability during cancer recovery raised procedural and reasonable adjustment failures throughout.

SJ Interview: Joelle Grogan

Dr Joelle Grogan is a legal scholar specialising in the rule of law in times of crisis. She presents The Law Show on BBC Radio 4, and is Co-Academic Director of the Rule of Law Clinic at the CEU Democracy Institute (Budapest), and a Senior Research Fellow at the UCD Sutherland School of Law. Her work focuses on constitutional accountability, emergency powers, and legal misinformation. In this interview, she examines the pressures facing the rule of law in the UK, from executive power and court delays to media narratives, emergencies, and the impact of AI on legal practice.

Justice reform risks targeting the wrong fix

As 2026 approaches, ministers eye jury trials while ignoring deeper causes of England’s criminal justice crisis