Editor, Solicitors Journal

Cycling to court

10 Mar 2021News

Cycling UK has applied for judicial review against the decision to remove a cycle lane opened during covid-19. Its solicitors, Leigh Day, said the decision to remove the cycle lane in Shoreham-by-Sea was “irrational and unlawful” because West Sussex County council failed to carry out an equality impact assessment and ignored statutory guidance on the management of its highways network. It also said the council breached its public sector equality duty by failing to undertake an equality impact assessment.

24 February 2021

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com

Latest Articles

Government clears path for new homes

The New Homes Accelerator is set to expedite the building of nearly 100,000 homes across England

EU AI Act brings GPAI rules to life

The EU’s new AI rules make GPAI compliance an immediate reality for UK companies developing or deploying these models

A historic step: 16-17 year olds gain vote

After years of advocacy, the UK Government confirms voting rights for 16 and 17 year olds

Supreme Court ruling on fraudulent trading liability

UK Supreme Court clarifies liability of third parties in MTIC fraud and limitation rules for dissolved companies.

Forty years on, surrogacy law is still playing catch-up

Despite international growth in surrogacy, UK law remains reactive, outdated and ill-equipped for today’s challenges

Tudor v Tecuci District Court: Article 8 extradition appeal analysis

High Court upholds Romanian extradition despite private life arguments

Law firm reports significant caseload rise

A surge in immigration-related legal advice reflects new UK policies tightening regulations affecting businesses and individuals

Costs Lawyers seek recognition and support

The Association of Costs Lawyers aims to elevate its members' status and engage the younger workforce

Gig economy drivers challenge their status

Former eCourier drivers have launched a legal claim to secure workers' rights against misclassification

When is an environmental case not an Aarhus claim?

Court of Appeal narrows Aarhus costs protection, requiring direct breach of environmental law, not incidental impacts.

Commonhold’s fragile foundations: risk and reality

Commonhold promises fairness and simplicity, but unresolved enforcement and financial risks threaten its stability and long-term value

How the amended English Arbitration Act puts London at the centre of global arbitration reform

The Arbitration Act 2025 introduces reforms enhancing efficiency, certainty, and London’s global leadership in international arbitration

Support needed for UK retailers now

Clarke Willmott LLP calls for intervention in the autumn statement to avert worsening conditions in retail

Court of Appeal clarifies GDPR compensation thresholds in Farley v Equiniti

Court of Appeal establishes new precedent on data breach compensation claims.

Crest Nicholson v Secretary of State: Water neutrality upheld in planning decision

High Court affirms water neutrality condition for housing development near ecologically sensitive sites.

SJ Interview: James Palmer CBE

James Palmer CBE, Partner of Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer, has long been recognised as one of the UK’s most influential corporate lawyers and policy voices. Awarded a CBE in 2025 for his services to business and law, he has combined a high-profile career in M&A with decades of work on legal reform. In this interview, he discusses the challenges of legislative inflation and corporate advice, access to justice, and the future role of technology.

The SQE is failing its own test

Five years on, the SQE is underperforming, and targeted reforms could close persistent gaps.