Court of Appeal TV to begin today

31 Oct 2013News

Footage not allowed in 'satire, entertainment or commercial use in advertising'

Broadcasting from the Court of Appeal begins today, with judges and lawyers being filmed from strategically placed cameras.

Funded jointly by the BBC, ITN, Press Association and Sky News, a 'court video journalist' will operate the production equipment and mobile cameras.

According to a joint statement from the media companies, a number of safeguards have been introduced, including a 70 second delay in some live broadcasts to allow the removal of footage which might breach reporting restrictions.

There will no coverage of private discussions between judges and counsel, and judges can suspend broadcasting if it is in the interests of justice.

The statement said footage can only be used in a news and current affairs context, and not in other genres such as 'satire, entertainment or commercial use in advertising'.

John Ryley, head of Sky News, said: "After a long campaign, this is hopefully just the first step towards opening up most courtrooms to cameras and giving everyone a seat in the public gallery of our judicial system.

"Seeing justice being done will no longer be restricted to those members of the public who have the opportunity and time to go to court.

"We anticipate that the next step should be to allow the filming of sentencing remarks in criminal trials, which the coalition government envisaged when it first announced the lifting of the camera ban two years ago."

Justice minister Shailesh Vara described the arrival of cameras in the Court of Appeal as a "landmark moment that will give the public the opportunity to see and hear the decisions of judges in their own words. It is another significant step towards achieving our aim of having an open and transparent justice system."

The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Thomas, added: "My fellow judges and I welcome the start of broadcasting from the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal has, of course, been open to the public and to journalists for a long time."

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Broadcasting from the Court of Appeal begins today, with judges and lawyers being filmed from strategically placed cameras.

Funded jointly by the BBC, ITN, Press Association and Sky News, a 'court video journalist' will operate the production equipment and mobile cameras.

There will no coverage of private discussions between judges and counsel, and judges can suspend broadcasting if it is in the interests of justice.

The statement said footage can only be used in a news and current affairs context, and not in other genres such as 'satire, entertainment or commercial use in advertising'.

"Seeing justice being done will no longer be restricted to those members of the public who have the opportunity and time to go to court.

Employment tribunal cases rising sharply

Recent Ministry of Justice figures reveal a significant increase in open Employment Tribunal cases and challenges faced by employers

SRA updates guidance for litigation supervision

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has enhanced its supervision guidelines to clarify litigation conduct after recent court rulings

Millions of fathers lack parental responsibility

Many fathers may be surprised to learn about their parental responsibility rights and how to secure them

Re Poundstretcher: cross-class cramdown survives even when six landlord classes say no

The Chancery Division sanctions Poundstretcher's restructuring plan despite six dissenting landlord classes, applying the Adler and Petrofac framework.

Ponsford v Sali: a property partnership's messy divorce shows why documentation wins partnership disputes

The Chancery Division takes a pragmatic, evidence based approach to untangling a property partnership built on undocumented cash dealings.

North Somerset District Council v Secretary of State: failing the flood sequential test is not the end of the story

The Planning Court confirms that a failed flood risk sequential test still gets weighed in the planning balance, not treated as an automatic refusal.

Thomas Armstrong (Aggregates) v Housing Secretary: when landfill buries a quarry's right to be reviewed

The Planning Court applies Pilkington and Hillside to find a 1954 quarry permission can no longer be revived under the ROMP regime.

Clerkenwell Lifestyle v HG Construction: be careful what you call "agreed" in extension of time correspondence

The TCC enforces a £955,943 adjudication award after rejecting a contractor's late attempt to recast email exchanges as a binding settlement.

Ward v Donnellan: when both sides lie, "no order for costs" is not a free pass

The Court of Appeal overturns a no order for costs ruling, finding a judge let a dishonest claimant off too lightly.

London Borough of Camden v BW: when a single missing fact can decide a capacity case

The Court of Protection finds an expert's failure to explore one consequence, losing a placement, was enough to undermine his capacity assessment.

Griffiths v Essex County Council: EAT clarifies causation in discrimination remedy awards and sends pension loss back for recalculation

A single act of indirect disability discrimination can ground a full loss of earnings award, even where a later constructive dismissal claim was framed only...