Clough & Willis promotes Ryan Browne to partner

27 Apr 2026Appointments

Bury and Bolton law firm Clough & Willis has appointed Ryan Browne as partner in its Private Client team, recognising his exceptional contributions and strong client relationships

Ryan joined the firm in 2022, initially as a solicitor, and was promoted to senior associate in 2024 due to his technical expertise and significant role in developing the firm’s Private Client services.

Before his time at Clough & Willis, Ryan worked at a Manchester firm for five years, focusing on Estate Administration matters. He completed his Bachelor of Laws degree at London Metropolitan University with First-Class Honours and attended The University of Law, graduating from the Legal Practice Course in 2019 before qualifying as a solicitor in 2021.

Adding to his extensive knowledge, Ryan advises on various Private Client issues such as drafting Wills, administering estates, submitting Grant Applications, handling Inheritance Tax Returns, and managing Deputyships and Lasting Powers of Attorney. His new role as partner will see him take on more strategic responsibilities while continuing to provide exceptional support to clients throughout the region.

“I’m incredibly proud to become a partner at Clough & Willis. Since arriving at the firm, I’ve been supported in a meaningful way which has developed my skill set and experience," Ryan expressed. He noted that the firm’s dedication to its clients and community resonated deeply with his values, indicating that his promotion feels like a logical and exciting progression.

Nicola Finbow, Head of the Private Client team, praised Ryan’s appointment, stating, “His technical ability, client-focused approach and dedication to delivering high quality advice have made a real impact on both his direct team and the wider firm." She expressed confidence that Ryan will continue to play a crucial role in the future of their Private Client offerings.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Employment tribunal cases rising sharply

Recent Ministry of Justice figures reveal a significant increase in open Employment Tribunal cases and challenges faced by employers

SRA updates guidance for litigation supervision

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has enhanced its supervision guidelines to clarify litigation conduct after recent court rulings

Millions of fathers lack parental responsibility

Many fathers may be surprised to learn about their parental responsibility rights and how to secure them

Re Poundstretcher: cross-class cramdown survives even when six landlord classes say no

The Chancery Division sanctions Poundstretcher's restructuring plan despite six dissenting landlord classes, applying the Adler and Petrofac framework.

Ponsford v Sali: a property partnership's messy divorce shows why documentation wins partnership disputes

The Chancery Division takes a pragmatic, evidence based approach to untangling a property partnership built on undocumented cash dealings.

North Somerset District Council v Secretary of State: failing the flood sequential test is not the end of the story

The Planning Court confirms that a failed flood risk sequential test still gets weighed in the planning balance, not treated as an automatic refusal.

Thomas Armstrong (Aggregates) v Housing Secretary: when landfill buries a quarry's right to be reviewed

The Planning Court applies Pilkington and Hillside to find a 1954 quarry permission can no longer be revived under the ROMP regime.

Clerkenwell Lifestyle v HG Construction: be careful what you call "agreed" in extension of time correspondence

The TCC enforces a £955,943 adjudication award after rejecting a contractor's late attempt to recast email exchanges as a binding settlement.

Ward v Donnellan: when both sides lie, "no order for costs" is not a free pass

The Court of Appeal overturns a no order for costs ruling, finding a judge let a dishonest claimant off too lightly.

London Borough of Camden v BW: when a single missing fact can decide a capacity case

The Court of Protection finds an expert's failure to explore one consequence, losing a placement, was enough to undermine his capacity assessment.

Griffiths v Essex County Council: EAT clarifies causation in discrimination remedy awards and sends pension loss back for recalculation

A single act of indirect disability discrimination can ground a full loss of earnings award, even where a later constructive dismissal claim was framed only...