Bar Standards Board unveils data and intelligence strategy 2024–2027

12 Apr 2024News

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) has taken a significant step forward by releasing its Data and Intelligence Strategy for the years 2024–2027

Recognising the pivotal role of effective data and intelligence in fulfilling its regulatory responsibilities, the BSB aims to harness these assets to enhance its operational efficiency and responsiveness.

Central to the BSB's ethos is the belief that data and intelligence serve as essential tools for enabling agile, evidence-led, and risk-based regulatory practices. By leveraging data-driven insights, the BSB not only strengthens its policymaking endeavours but also ensures transparency by regularly disseminating key data concerning developments within the legal sector and the regulator's own performance and decision-making processes.

As the BSB approaches the culmination of its 2022–2025 Strategic Plan, it acknowledges the indispensable role of data and intelligence capabilities in its operations. Looking ahead to the forthcoming Strategic Plan from 2025 onwards, the newly unveiled Data & Intelligence Strategy is poised to serve as a cornerstone, laying the groundwork for the BSB's commitments and strategic objectives.

Outlined within the strategy document are the BSB's vision, objectives, and a comprehensive implementation roadmap for the next three years. By articulating its aspirations and delineating clear pathways for action, the BSB aims to fortify its data and intelligence infrastructure, thereby empowering itself to achieve its strategic goals effectively.

The strategy underscores the BSB's commitment to continual improvement and responsiveness to evolving regulatory challenges. By fostering a culture of data-driven decision-making and leveraging intelligence insights, the BSB endeavours to enhance its regulatory efficacy and uphold the highest standards of professional conduct within the legal profession.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Employment tribunal cases rising sharply

Recent Ministry of Justice figures reveal a significant increase in open Employment Tribunal cases and challenges faced by employers

SRA updates guidance for litigation supervision

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has enhanced its supervision guidelines to clarify litigation conduct after recent court rulings

Millions of fathers lack parental responsibility

Many fathers may be surprised to learn about their parental responsibility rights and how to secure them

Re Poundstretcher: cross-class cramdown survives even when six landlord classes say no

The Chancery Division sanctions Poundstretcher's restructuring plan despite six dissenting landlord classes, applying the Adler and Petrofac framework.

Ponsford v Sali: a property partnership's messy divorce shows why documentation wins partnership disputes

The Chancery Division takes a pragmatic, evidence based approach to untangling a property partnership built on undocumented cash dealings.

North Somerset District Council v Secretary of State: failing the flood sequential test is not the end of the story

The Planning Court confirms that a failed flood risk sequential test still gets weighed in the planning balance, not treated as an automatic refusal.

Thomas Armstrong (Aggregates) v Housing Secretary: when landfill buries a quarry's right to be reviewed

The Planning Court applies Pilkington and Hillside to find a 1954 quarry permission can no longer be revived under the ROMP regime.

Clerkenwell Lifestyle v HG Construction: be careful what you call "agreed" in extension of time correspondence

The TCC enforces a £955,943 adjudication award after rejecting a contractor's late attempt to recast email exchanges as a binding settlement.

Ward v Donnellan: when both sides lie, "no order for costs" is not a free pass

The Court of Appeal overturns a no order for costs ruling, finding a judge let a dishonest claimant off too lightly.

London Borough of Camden v BW: when a single missing fact can decide a capacity case

The Court of Protection finds an expert's failure to explore one consequence, losing a placement, was enough to undermine his capacity assessment.

Griffiths v Essex County Council: EAT clarifies causation in discrimination remedy awards and sends pension loss back for recalculation

A single act of indirect disability discrimination can ground a full loss of earnings award, even where a later constructive dismissal claim was framed only...