Editor, Solicitors Journal

Associate Insight: Proofreading - what are your lawyers risking?

15 Apr 2015|Feature|Add your comment

By Jean-Yves Gilg

By LexisNexis

www.lexisnexis.co.uk/managingpartner

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Comments

Latest Articles

Dexia v Torino: lessons from the latest swaps ruling

The Commercial Court clarifies jurisdiction, capacity and validity issues arising from Italian local-authority swaps

Coroner to examine care home death

A coroner will review care practices at Ballater House Care Home after the tragic death of Daniel Lindsay

Lloyds Bank fraud case heads to trial

The High Court has set a trial date for October 2028 in a significant claim against Lloyds Bank regarding an alleged £1 billion corporate fraud...

SQN Global v Hughes: High Court finds fraudulent trading by Genesis haulage directors

Court finds haulage company directors dissipated assets in breach of a freezing order.

Wallace Estates v Durkan Estates: Court gives first guidance on joint TCC and FTT case management

First joint TCC-FTT hearing sets template for managing overlapping Building Safety Act disputes.

Haines v Talbott: High Court apportions liability 70:30 after A30 smoke collision

High Court finds van driver negligent but claimant contributorily negligent after smoke-obscured collision.

Sucden Financial v TMT Metals: Court of Appeal orders defence served despite pending Supreme Court appeal

Court of Appeal balances jurisdiction appeal rights against need to progress underlying fraud claim proceedings.

Duffy v House of Gods: EAT quashes refusal of interim relief in whistleblowing case

Employment Appeal Tribunal finds tribunal wrongly treated factual disputes as decisive in interim relief application.

MUF v Secretary of State for Defence: High Court quashes fourth ARAP refusal for Afghan judge

High Court quashes fourth refusal of Afghan judge's relocation application under ARAP scheme.

Mohammed Sarwar v Bilal Sarwar: High Court dismisses unfair prejudice petition over hotel business split

High Court rejects family's unfair prejudice claim after finding hotel business division agreement genuine.

David Hill v HMRC: Upper Tribunal clarifies scope of reasonable excuse based on adviser reliance

Upper Tribunal partly allows appeal over penalties for non-compliance with HMRC information notices.

Code Students v Nottingham City Council: High Court refuses judicial review over rival scheme approval

High Court refuses permission for judicial review of Nottingham student accommodation planning decision.

KDY v Nicholas Langham: High Court strikes out 300-page claim against eleven defendants

High Court strikes out sprawling multi-defendant claim brought by mother on behalf of disabled son.

SJ Interview: Hannah Field

Hannah Field, head of Shoosmiths’ London office and its Dispute Resolution & Litigation team in London, speaks to Solicitors Journal about the firm’s growth strategy,...