Editor, Solicitors Journal

ASHFORDS FINED

1 Jan 2021News

National firm Ashfords agreed to a fine of £16,200 under a regulatory settlement agreement after admitting improperly using client account as a banking facility. This related to an arrangement which permitted third parties to pay money into client account in connection with seven separate building projects before being paid out, even though no significant element of legal services was carried out. More than £1m was involved. The breach was revealed during an internal training session. The firm also paid £1,350 in costs. 23 December 2020

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com

Latest Articles

Building Safety Act litigation redefines investor risk

Recent case law shows how courts and tribunals are extending Building Safety Act liabilities beyond what investors originally anticipated

Preparing for the Great Wealth transfer

As wealth passes between generations, early planning and cross-generational engagement are becoming critical to effective estate administration.

Lawyers highlight issues with new FRCs

The extended fixed recoverable costs system raises significant issues for injured individuals and legal practitioners

US musicians lose challenge over UK performers' rights restrictions

High Court rules treaty obligations non-justiciable in domestic law without parliamentary incorporation.

Actinon PTE Limited v Char Biocarbon Inc: Affirmation and contractual obligations

Commercial dispute highlights principles of waiver by election and contract interpretation

Matthew Haydon v R: Court of Appeal clarifies "likely" in explosive substances offences

Court confirms "likely" means "could well happen" rather than "more probable than not"

Cloisters Business Centre v Anvari: mixed-use premises and service charge protection

Court confirms tenants of mixed-use properties qualify for statutory service charge controls.

NHS commissioning activities fall outside TUPE protection, Court of Appeal rules

Employment law case clarifies when healthcare reorganisations trigger transfer protections for staff.

BTR Core Fund v HMRC: Upper Tribunal clarifies overpayment relief exclusions

Stamp duty land tax overpayment relief and the meaning of "mistake in a claim"

Court of Appeal rules criminal earnings count as income for ESA purposes

Criminal activity constitutes work and generates income for benefits assessment purposes.

Alpha Anne v Great Ormond Street Hospital: Indirect discrimination and TUPE transfers

Post-transfer pay disparity constitutes unlawful indirect race discrimination despite TUPE complications.

Edozo Limited v Valos (UK) Limited: functionality of computer programs not protected by copyright

Software functionality copying does not infringe underlying source code copyright in UK law.

Mahadevan Krishnamohan v Secretary of State: planning permission validity and procedural compliance

Certificate of lawfulness rejected after attempt to circumvent Green Belt occupancy conditions fails

Williams v Information Commissioner: NCND policy upheld for asylum accommodation locations

Tribunal confirms Home Office entitled to neither confirm nor deny holding information about asylum seeker transport to protect vulnerable individuals.

Deceit, awareness and the Ivanishvili decision

The Privy Council clarifies the level of awareness required for reliance in deceit, rejecting the Marme “contemporaneous consciousness” gloss

SJ Interview: Joelle Grogan

Dr Joelle Grogan is a legal scholar specialising in the rule of law in times of crisis. She presents The Law Show on BBC Radio 4, and is Co-Academic Director of the Rule of Law Clinic at the CEU Democracy Institute (Budapest), and a Senior Research Fellow at the UCD Sutherland School of Law. Her work focuses on constitutional accountability, emergency powers, and legal misinformation. In this interview, she examines the pressures facing the rule of law in the UK, from executive power and court delays to media narratives, emergencies, and the impact of AI on legal practice.

Justice reform risks targeting the wrong fix

As 2026 approaches, ministers eye jury trials while ignoring deeper causes of England’s criminal justice crisis