AML: how law firms can best protect themselves from SRA money laundering fines

Harriet Holmes explains how law firms can reduce the likelihood of regulatory failures and avoid potentially costly fines
In recent years, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has issued an increasing number of fines for failures in Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance.
These fines serve as a wake-up call for law firms, signalling that compliance with AML regulations should be a top priority. But what are the lessons from these fines, and how can firms best protect themselves?
Increasingly costly penalties
Between October 2023 and March 2024, the SRA issued around £290,000 in fines to 19 firms. In contrast, it issued just six fines for AML shortcomings in the proceeding six-month period, an increase of 217 percent. Legal practices of all sizes are getting slapped with penalties.
The SRA takes AML breaches seriously because non-compliance increases the risk of criminals exploiting law firms to launder money through legal channels. When money laundering costs the UK economy some £100bn annually, the risk is significant.
For firms, the consequences of AML violations extend beyond financial penalties. They can lead to reputational damage, loss of clients, and even the possibility of more severe regulatory action.
Critical lessons to avoid fines
The main reasons given by the SRA for these fines include inadequate risk assessments, failure to maintain updated client due diligence, and inadequate AML policies.
So, what can firms learn from these recent AML fines?
1. Perform comprehensive risk assessments
When inadequate risk assessments are a primary reason for fines, law firms must identify and document potential AML risks at the firm, client and matter levels.
A thorough risk assessment enables firms to tailor mitigation steps accordingly and conduct the right level of due diligence. Lawyers should remember that no two firms are identical, and neither are their clients.
2. Implement robust AML policies, controls and procedures (PCPs)
Firms must implement and enforce their AML policies, ensuring all relevant staff members are well-trained in identifying suspicious activity and following proper reporting procedures.
AML policies, controls and procedures should be regularly reviewed and updated to align with current regulations and best practices. Firms should also ensure any written procedures are updated in line with changes to legislation.
For instance, there have been several updates this year, which include High-Risk Third Countries,

.jpg&w=3840&q=60)


![Re Beth [2026] EWFC 156 (B): Family Court identifies perpetrator of non-accidental injuries in infant fact-finding proceedings](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.iicj.net%2Farticle%2Ffeature%2FSwindon_%2C_The_Law_Courts_.jpg&w=3840&q=60)
![The Local Authority v The Mother [2026] EWFC 166 (B): Resolutions assessment refused and special guardianship order made in non-accidental injury proceedings](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.iicj.net%2Farticle%2Ffeature%2FThe_Royal_Courts_of_Justice_-_geograph.org.uk_-_2952836.jpg&w=3840&q=60)








