Wed Sep 06 2017Civil Justice Council proposes fixed costs regime for hearing loss claims Proposals could bring about a more efficient system but must not restrict work required to allow lawyers to bring a claim, says APIL
Tue Aug 29 2017Litigant in person ordered to pay more than £80,000 in costsHourly rates claimed substantially lower than published guideline rates, says judge
Tue Aug 22 2017When the norm is unjustIn light of Briggs v CEF Holdings Ltd, Louise Shaw considers when it is unjust to make the usual part 36 order for costs in the event of a late acceptance
Mon Aug 14 2017Navigating the MoJ portal and fixed costs worldSarah Robson gives the lowdown on Kerry Underwood 's new book on personal injury and costs
Mon Aug 07 2017Good reason and exceptional circumstancesDavid Cooper considers when parties may depart from the budget at detailed assessment in light of Harrison
Mon Aug 07 2017A more than half empty glassJackson LJ has not addressed the root causes of high costs in clin neg claims, which may lead to serious, unintended consequences for patient safety, explains Peter Walsh
Mon Aug 07 2017A further step along the fixed costs roadLord Justice Jackson's report on extending the fixed costs regime is a welcome development, writes Kerry Underwood
Fri Aug 04 2017Chasing the holy grailLord Justice Jackson has scaled back his fixed costs proposals, but this is far from the end of the story, writes John van der Luit-Drummond