News Editor, Solicitors Journal

Unified Patent Court panel

20 Oct 2022|60 Seconds|Add your comment

The news in 60 seconds

The Unified Patent Court has confirmed 85 of its judges from across the EU have now accepted positions on the court. IP law firm Mathys & Squire said after years of delay, the UPC is “fast approaching” and patent holders worldwide should not ignore it. The firm said the nationalities of the judges reflect where the ‘hotspots’ of EU patent litigation are. Of the 85 judges appointed, the countries with the greatest representation are Germany (27); France (17); Italy (11); Netherlands (seven); Belgium (five); Denmark, Finland and Sweden (four each).

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Comments

Latest Articles

Protecting your face: trade marks in the AI age

As AI makes convincing deepfakes effortless, public figures are turning to trade mark law to protect their valuable image

UK litigation funding sector in crisis

A recent report reveals that the UK's litigation funding sector is lagging behind global competitors due to government inaction

Domestic killers will face longer sentences

A new legal change will see domestic murderers face a 25-year sentencing starting point for their crimes

Parole Board provides new resources for victims

The Parole Board has launched a video and leaflet to assist victims navigating the parole process.

Dickinson v Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals: Pabrinex failure causes Wernicke's encephalopathy and profound functional disorder, rules High Court

NHS trust's admitted failure to administer Vitamin B1 to an alcoholic patient leads to lifelong disability and 24-hour care needs.

CP Holdings v Assicurazioni Generali: broker's failure to press for conformity term proves fatal to €160m Covid-19 BI claim

A confirmed "willingness in principle" to agree a conformity clause is not the same as agreeing one, rules the Commercial Court.

Rowntree v Performing Right Society: Court of Appeal dismisses Blur drummer's black box royalties class action

Pro rata distribution of unmatched music royalties is not an abuse of dominance without a viable counterfactual, rules Court of Appeal.

City Outdoor Media v Secretary of State: Court of Appeal confirms scope of inquiry for site-wide advertising discontinuance notices

Inspector need not assess every class of deemed consent when upholding a site-wide discontinuance notice, Court of Appeal rules.

Kensington Mortgage Company v Price: mortgagee in possession must register as Welsh landlord before serving possession notice

High Court rules that a mortgagee cannot separate its status under Welsh housing legislation to avoid landlord registration requirements.

Weis v Greater Manchester Combined Authority: Court of Appeal defines CAT's review powers in landmark Subsidy Control Act ruling

First Court of Appeal decision under the 2022 Act confirms the CAT determines for itself whether a subsidy exists.