News Editor, Solicitors Journal

Training for Ukraine judges

14 Dec 202260 Seconds

The news in 60 seconds

A training programme for Ukrainian judges set to conduct trials for war crimes has begun as part of UK efforts to secure justice for the country’s citizens. More than 90 judges will undergo the UK-funded sessions, being held under the supervision of Sir Howard Morrison KC, a former judge at the International Criminal Court. Sir Howard was appointed by the former attorney general in March to act as an independent advisor to the prosecutor general of Ukraine, now Andriy Kostin, as part of a wider support package.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com

Latest Articles

New UK bill could weaken economic crime fight

The Law Society warns that proposed changes to anti-money laundering regulations threaten effective oversight and increase costs for law firms

Historic treaty for legal protection awaits ratification

One year after signing, the UK government is urged to ratify the Luxembourg Convention to protect lawyers

South Staffs Water fined nearly £1m

Leigh Day welcomes significant fine imposed on South Staffordshire for a major data breach affecting customers and employees

Strengthening governance readiness for trustees

Trustees should enhance their governance structures to integrate investment, funding, and covenant considerations effectively

Supreme Court rejects limitation period for unfair prejudice petitions

The Supreme Court ruled unfair prejudice petitions are not subject to statutory limitation periods under the Limitation Act 1980

Manhattan Coffee v Mwagiru: when directors lack standing to sue in a company's name during liquidation

A director of a company in liquidation cannot bring proceedings in the company's name.

Rupert Lowe MP v ICGS: High Court rules parliamentary privilege bars judicial review of MP disciplinary proceedings

ICGS complaints against MPs fall within exclusive cognisance of the House of Commons.

Twigg and Bedford v R: Court of Appeal clarifies "in charge" under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991

Two people in different locations can simultaneously be in charge of a dangerous dog.

Przybys v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police: High Court dismisses judicial review of police decision not to investigate alleged manslaughter

Police discretion not to investigate gross negligence manslaughter upheld as rational where expert regulators were already engaged.

Training for Ukraine judges

The news in 60 seconds

New UK bill could weaken economic crime fight

Historic treaty for legal protection awaits ratification

South Staffs Water fined nearly £1m

Strengthening governance readiness for trustees

Supreme Court rejects limitation period for unfair prejudice petitions

Manhattan Coffee v Mwagiru: when directors lack standing to sue in a company's name during liquidation

Rupert Lowe MP v ICGS: High Court rules parliamentary privilege bars judicial review of MP disciplinary proceedings

Twigg and Bedford v R: Court of Appeal clarifies "in charge" under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991

Przybys v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police: High Court dismisses judicial review of police decision not to investigate alleged manslaughter

Mudford Parish Council v Somerset Council: when does a local plan policy to "provide" a use require its delivery?

LLJ v London Borough of Hackney: High Court finds housing appeal decision unlawful over Band A refusal

SB v PB: how the Court of Protection balanced contact restrictions against care home placement stability

King’s Speech outlines property ownership changes

SJ Interview: Keith Froud

Navigating the accountability gap in a transformed legal landscape