TikTok or TikNot: understanding social media for law firms

19 Mar 2025Opinion

Andy Cullwick, Group Director of Marketing at First4Lawyers, shares the results of a recent white paper and his thoughts on how to make social media work for law firms

Since LinkedIn first burst onto the scene in 2002, social media has been a feature of most of our working lives.

You’d be hard pressed to find a law firm these days that doesn’t have a presence on the platform, as well as others like Facebook, X (formerly Twitter) and Instagram. Some have even tried their hand at TikTok.

Having a page, or even posting content to it, doesn’t necessarily equate to success though. Getting engagement is tougher than it looks, as many firms are finding to their cost.

No one can deny the growing prevalence of social media, and most people are on it in some form, but how many of us really understand how it works and how to make it work for us?

Our survey says

Research as part of our latest white paper entitled ‘TikTok or TikNot: Law firms in the Social Media Age’ found that law firms, on average, spend a quarter of their marketing budgets on social media activity, but are seeing little return on investment.

Of the 100 firms we spoke to, the average marketing budget ranged from £84,000 to £159,000 depending on their size and make-up, so social media spend is significant.

Marketers cited the ability to use social media effectively and keep up with trends in order to engage prospective clients among the main challenges for the year ahead.

But when asked what they thought was the single, most effective means of generating new business, SEO, email marketing and event sponsorship were the most popular answers. Social media platforms, with the exception of LinkedIn, were bottom of the list.

Curiously, given that it is predominantly a B2B platform, LinkedIn ranked only just behind personal recommendations and online search as the most popular way firms thought that prospective clients were likely to find them.

When consumers were asked the same question via our own YouGov research of 1,000 people, however, neither LinkedIn nor any other social media platform came close. When choosing legal services, recommendations from friends and family or a professional, online searches and review sites were all more likely to help them reach a decision.

Our research revealed some muddled thinking as well as a recurring theme. Law firms set significant store by social media, but struggle when it comes to understanding how to make it work for them.

Making social media work for you

We spoke to a range of experts for our white paper and the main take away is that there is no one size fits all with social media. Making it work for you is a work in progress.

One of those experts, Attwells Solicitors, for example, has made an extraordinary impact on TikTok, but the platform isn’t for everyone, which is evidenced by the fact that only 10% of the firms we spoke to were actually present on it.

Resist the temptation of having a presence on every channel simply to ‘cover all the bases’ and instead drill down into where your audience actually is. Define and build your tribe. A third of the firms posting on Facebook were talking to fewer than 500 followers and, in one case, 98. Not quite screaming into the void, but not an effective use of their time.

Speak to them in a language they will understand and with good quality, informative, authentic and easily digestible content. Short-form video, in particular, has seen a surge in popularity. Savvy consumers will scroll past most promotional posts, whereas giving away a little free advice on topics they’re interested in, for example, is much more likely to grab attention.

Post consistently – two or three times a week at least – and try repurposing the same content for different platforms if resources are an issue.

Putting money behind social media posts will undoubtedly increase your reach far faster than trying to achieve this organically, but the quality of your content will still be the biggest factor in terms of whether people engage with it or not.

Finally, and most importantly, mix it up. From SEO to events to PR to social media, I haven’t come across a successful marketing strategy that’s limited to just one channel.

Social media marketing is undeniably an important ingredient in the marketing mix, but it shouldn’t be the only one.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Since LinkedIn first burst onto the scene in 2002, social media has been a feature of most of our working lives.

Having a page, or even posting content to it, doesn’t necessarily equate to success though. Getting engagement is tougher than it looks, as many firms are finding to their cost.

No one can deny the growing prevalence of social media, and most people are on it in some form, but how many of us really understand how it works and how to make it work for us?

Our survey says

Of the 100 firms we spoke to, the average marketing budget ranged from £84,000 to £159,000 depending on their size and make-up, so social media spend is significant.

Marketers cited the ability to use social media effectively and keep up with trends in order to engage prospective clients among the main challenges for the year ahead.

Our research revealed some muddled thinking as well as a recurring theme. Law firms set significant store by social media, but struggle when it comes to understanding how to make it work for them.

Making social media work for you

We spoke to a range of experts for our white paper and the main take away is that there is no one size fits all with social media. Making it work for you is a work in progress.

Employment tribunal cases rising sharply

Recent Ministry of Justice figures reveal a significant increase in open Employment Tribunal cases and challenges faced by employers

SRA updates guidance for litigation supervision

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has enhanced its supervision guidelines to clarify litigation conduct after recent court rulings

Millions of fathers lack parental responsibility

Many fathers may be surprised to learn about their parental responsibility rights and how to secure them

Re Poundstretcher: cross-class cramdown survives even when six landlord classes say no

The Chancery Division sanctions Poundstretcher's restructuring plan despite six dissenting landlord classes, applying the Adler and Petrofac framework.

Ponsford v Sali: a property partnership's messy divorce shows why documentation wins partnership disputes

The Chancery Division takes a pragmatic, evidence based approach to untangling a property partnership built on undocumented cash dealings.

North Somerset District Council v Secretary of State: failing the flood sequential test is not the end of the story

The Planning Court confirms that a failed flood risk sequential test still gets weighed in the planning balance, not treated as an automatic refusal.

Thomas Armstrong (Aggregates) v Housing Secretary: when landfill buries a quarry's right to be reviewed

The Planning Court applies Pilkington and Hillside to find a 1954 quarry permission can no longer be revived under the ROMP regime.

Clerkenwell Lifestyle v HG Construction: be careful what you call "agreed" in extension of time correspondence

The TCC enforces a £955,943 adjudication award after rejecting a contractor's late attempt to recast email exchanges as a binding settlement.

Ward v Donnellan: when both sides lie, "no order for costs" is not a free pass

The Court of Appeal overturns a no order for costs ruling, finding a judge let a dishonest claimant off too lightly.

London Borough of Camden v BW: when a single missing fact can decide a capacity case

The Court of Protection finds an expert's failure to explore one consequence, losing a placement, was enough to undermine his capacity assessment.

Griffiths v Essex County Council: EAT clarifies causation in discrimination remedy awards and sends pension loss back for recalculation

A single act of indirect disability discrimination can ground a full loss of earnings award, even where a later constructive dismissal claim was framed only...