Three-point turn: disguised salary, significant influence and capital contribution

Junior LLP members may be facing disproportionately higher risks as they are asked to inject a significant amount of capital, without a commensurate increase in their influence, say Phillip D'Costa and James Harrison
Since the advent of the Limited Liability Partnerships Act in April 2001, LLPs have quickly become a popular structure for law firms, hedge funds and professional practices. Seemingly, they offer the best of both worlds: the fixed liability of a limited company allied with the structural flexibility of a partnership. However, they now face their first major challenge.
LLPs vary in how they are structured, but a common model includes: full equity members, who contribute capital and share profits; and fixed share members, who contribute some capital and receive a fixed share of profits.
LLPs are currently treated as partnerships for tax purposes, but HMRC is concerned that some fixed share members are avoiding employee tax and national insurance contributions despite having a guaranteed income and little say in decision-making.
The new rules contained in the draft Finance Bill 2014, due on 6 April 2014, would remove the presumption that an LLP member is self-employed for tax purposes and replace it with a three-condition test. In the face of widespread outcry over the test and its application, HMRC has issued a revised technical note and guidance.
The guidance clarifies that members of an LLP “who are, in effect, providing services on terms similar to employment are treated as ‘employees’ for tax purposes”. An individual member of an LLP will be treated as an employee if all three conditions are met:
1. Disguised salary
Disguised salary is an amount that is either fixed; variable (but varied without reference to the overall amount of the LLP’s profits or losses); or not, in practice, affected by the overall profits or losses of the LLP.
2. Significant influence
This condition is met if the mutual rights and duties of the members and the LLP do not give the member in question significant influence over the LLP’s affairs. Those who are involved in the management of the business are considered to have significant influence, as are those who have little interest or say in the day-to-day management, but whose roles and rights mean that they can exert significant influence over the business as a whole.
3. Capital contribution
This condition is met if the member’s contribution to the LLP is less than 25 per cent of the disguised salary.



.jpg&w=3840&q=60)








__WEB.jpg&w=3840&q=60)

.jpg&w=3840&q=60)