The limits of conveyancers' duties as legal advisers

Negotiation of property transactions is an emotive business and 'solicitors need to understand the confines of their role in order to 'give the best advice, as Jonathan Smithers explains
I was recently challenged by an estate agent, keen to ensure the safety of their commission. They said that I seemed to be looking for problems.
I took that as a compliment (even though I am fairly sure it wasn't meant as one!). What I pointed out in response was that I could not find solutions to problems unless I had identified what those problems might be in the first place. Spotting the difficulties is usually the easy part, knowing what to do about them is altogether more taxing. The same problem may have many different solutions, each of them valid in their own right but with differing consequences.
Transactions are sometimes less robust than we think. Although the buyer wants to buy and the seller wants to sell they will have a tipping point. That point will be, and may remain, unseen and unidentified. Indeed it is probably nowhere near where even the client thinks it is. How often have you heard the selling client saying that they refuse to drop the price another penny, only to sleep on it and realise that pragmatism is the best course. Every client will have a history, which in turn will affect their willingness to look at problems in a particular manner. Some will be risk averse, others verging on ?the reckless.
Choosing your battles
It is important to realise that there is no right or wrong answer and not tell the client what to do but rather to advise them. I often find that advice is not as they would wish. The client wants you to be their advocate, to be on their side. If that means being derogatory or bullish on their behalf about the person on the other side of their transaction that is seen as part of our role. However, frequently that is the opposite of what the client needs.
Being a trusted adviser, someone to put the problem from the other person's point of view, is a valuable tool in our armoury. Many times a client has called me, having thought about the outrageous behaviour of their opposite number overnight or over the weekend. They have been in a frenzy demanding that they are made to behave and act decently. That is, until I point out that if my own client was in their shoes they might well act in the same way and even if they wouldn't, do they really want to make this the line in the sand? The punch line is of course what do you really want to achieve? The answer is that they want to buy or sell. This is already an expensive business so the costs of withdrawing will simply add to the heartache. In a month or six, or certainly a year or two the stress of the moment will have been forgotten. It may become a good 'my move was worse than yours' dinner party story but make the story a positive one '“ about how a solution was found.
Standing up for ones principles is the right and proper thing to do but if the enemy you have beaten is the person whose money you want or whose house you crave, the victory will feel very hollow. Indeed the client will almost certainly regret the decision at a later point. Some while ago I was acting for a selling client who refused to accept a lower offer made by their buyer.
.jpg&w=3840&q=60)


![Re Beth [2026] EWFC 156 (B): Family Court identifies perpetrator of non-accidental injuries in infant fact-finding proceedings](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.iicj.net%2Farticle%2Ffeature%2FSwindon_%2C_The_Law_Courts_.jpg&w=3840&q=60)
![The Local Authority v The Mother [2026] EWFC 166 (B): Resolutions assessment refused and special guardianship order made in non-accidental injury proceedings](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.iicj.net%2Farticle%2Ffeature%2FThe_Royal_Courts_of_Justice_-_geograph.org.uk_-_2952836.jpg&w=3840&q=60)








