Talbots Law expands agricultural law team

4 Nov 2025Appointments

Talbots Law enhances its Agricultural Law team by appointing two new senior directors to support clients in rural areas as part of its ongoing growth strategy

Talbots Law has announced an expansion of its Agricultural Law team with the appointment of two seasoned directors, Sara Pickerin and Nicholas Playford. With over 40 years of combined experience in agricultural law, the pair joins the firm as it aims to bolster its services for rural clients. This move brings the total number of directors in the specialist team to four, enhancing the firm’s ability to provide comprehensive agricultural services.

The team focuses on various aspects of rural law, specifically strategic land management and diversification projects. Their efforts include repurposing farmland for alternative uses such as solar panel installations, glamping, holiday accommodation, and farm shops, all intended to help farmers diversify their income and maximise their land’s potential.

Talbots Law operates across 19 offices and has established a significant presence in rural areas such as Leek, Market Drayton, Telford, and Worcester, serving clients throughout England and Wales. Sean Spinetto, Head of Agriculture at Talbots Law, commented, “We are incredibly proud of the growth we’ve achieved in this specialist area of law and thrilled to welcome Sara and Nicholas as directors within our team. Attracting top talent is a testament to the reputation we are building in the agricultural sector.”

He further added, “Their expertise will help us continue supporting farmers, landowners, and rural businesses with both the challenges and opportunities they face, particularly around land diversification and futureproofing agricultural enterprises for many years to come.”

The firm has been actively participating in country shows throughout summer 2025, and it plans to showcase its Agricultural Law services at LAMMA 2026, the UK’s largest agricultural machinery and technology show, held at the NEC.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Progress in cleaning up Companies House

A new report highlights ongoing improvements to the Companies House register aimed at tackling economic crime

Employment tribunal cases rising sharply

Recent Ministry of Justice figures reveal a significant increase in open Employment Tribunal cases and challenges faced by employers

SRA updates guidance for litigation supervision

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has enhanced its supervision guidelines to clarify litigation conduct after recent court rulings

Re Poundstretcher: cross-class cramdown survives even when six landlord classes say no

The Chancery Division sanctions Poundstretcher's restructuring plan despite six dissenting landlord classes, applying the Adler and Petrofac framework.

Ponsford v Sali: a property partnership's messy divorce shows why documentation wins partnership disputes

The Chancery Division takes a pragmatic, evidence based approach to untangling a property partnership built on undocumented cash dealings.

North Somerset District Council v Secretary of State: failing the flood sequential test is not the end of the story

The Planning Court confirms that a failed flood risk sequential test still gets weighed in the planning balance, not treated as an automatic refusal.

Thomas Armstrong (Aggregates) v Housing Secretary: when landfill buries a quarry's right to be reviewed

The Planning Court applies Pilkington and Hillside to find a 1954 quarry permission can no longer be revived under the ROMP regime.

Clerkenwell Lifestyle v HG Construction: be careful what you call "agreed" in extension of time correspondence

The TCC enforces a £955,943 adjudication award after rejecting a contractor's late attempt to recast email exchanges as a binding settlement.

Ward v Donnellan: when both sides lie, "no order for costs" is not a free pass

The Court of Appeal overturns a no order for costs ruling, finding a judge let a dishonest claimant off too lightly.

London Borough of Camden v BW: when a single missing fact can decide a capacity case

The Court of Protection finds an expert's failure to explore one consequence, losing a placement, was enough to undermine his capacity assessment.

Griffiths v Essex County Council: EAT clarifies causation in discrimination remedy awards and sends pension loss back for recalculation

A single act of indirect disability discrimination can ground a full loss of earnings award, even where a later constructive dismissal claim was framed only...