Deputy EditorSolicitors Journal

SRA updates Enforcement Strategy

SRA updates Enforcement Strategy

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has updated its Enforcement Strategy, which explains when and how it would take action against a law firm or solicitor.

The strategy aims to provide greater clarity on how it decides whether to act in a given case, and what factors it considers in deciding the seriousness of misconduct and the action it should take.

To support this the SRA has also made public a number of ‘topic guides’, which summarise the mitigating and aggravating factors it takes into account when considering cases in common areas.

These documents cover areas such as solicitors being convicted of criminal offences, drink driving, misusing social media, or failing to comply with the SRA transparency rules.

SRA chief executive Paul Philip said: “Our revised Enforcement Strategy is designed to make it clear about what we do and when.

"It sets out the type of situations where we need to step in to protect the public. It will give the profession confidence that we consider and take action in an open, fair and consistent way.”

Alongside the enforcement strategy, the SRA has also published proposed changes to the wording of its rules regarding when firms should report cases of potential misconduct to the regulator.

The regulator publicly consulted on these rule changes last year, after it became apparent that law firms were interpreting the existing rules in different ways.

The rule changes say that firms should apply their professional judgement to decide whether potential misconduct may have taken place and that they should then report the issues as soon as possible.

In response to feedback around concerns that individuals reporting potential misconduct may be victimised, the rules emphasise that nobody should face detrimental treatment for making, or proposing to make, a report.

Philp added: “Timely reporting of serious concerns is a key part of public protection. Our new rules make it clear that solicitors and law firms should report potential misconduct promptly.”

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

Axiom Ince collapses: Police investigation begins

Tue Oct 03 2023

Barrister Carly Walters ordered to be disbarred

Tue Oct 03 2023

Fines to increase for employers without robust employment screening

Mon Oct 02 2023

IBA publishes for the first time a legal agenda identifying profession’s most pressing concerns

Mon Oct 02 2023

Black History Month: Legal profession celebrates influential Black women lawyers

Mon Oct 02 2023

The Law Society intervention ensures liberal approach to dealing with concurrent problems on legal aid

Fri Sep 29 2023

Jeanne Kelly elected President of the British Irish Chamber of Commerce

Fri Sep 29 2023

Families continue to be victims of a broken justice system

Fri Sep 29 2023

Call for compensation scheme extension to help more abuse survivors

Fri Sep 29 2023
FeaturedChris Packham legal action over Rishi Sunak's announcement
Chris Packham legal action over Rishi Sunak's announcement
Why civil mediation is the smarter choice than pressing for your day in court
Why civil mediation is the smarter choice than pressing for your day in court
SRA now managing the Solicitors Indemnity Fund
SRA now managing the Solicitors Indemnity Fund
Law Society concerned over fixed recoverable costs rollout
Law Society concerned over fixed recoverable costs rollout
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?