Sidley advises Apollo Funds' investment in Syntegon

3 Apr 2026Announcements

Sidley has taken the lead role for Apollo-managed funds in acquiring a 37% stake in Syntegon to support the company’s growth strategy across North America while enhancing its market position as a technology leader in regulated industries. The investment comes from CVC Capital Partners, which will retain a majority stake of about 63%, marking a significant milestone for Syntegon as it embarks on its next phase of development. Headquartered in Stuttgart, Germany, Syntegon offers integrated solutions for processing and packaging in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and food sectors. The company has shown resilience and growth since CVC's initial investment with revenue increasing significantly to around €1.75 billion and operating profit growing fourfold. This transaction is now awaiting customary regulatory approvals. Sidley’s deal team, spearheaded by partners Ramy Wahbeh and Florian Kamp, also relies on an extensive cross-office collaboration that includes expertise from various sectors such as global finance, environmental health, cybersecurity, and more, ensuring a comprehensive approach to the multifaceted aspects of this significant investment.

Latest Articles

Employment tribunal cases rising sharply

Recent Ministry of Justice figures reveal a significant increase in open Employment Tribunal cases and challenges faced by employers

SRA updates guidance for litigation supervision

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has enhanced its supervision guidelines to clarify litigation conduct after recent court rulings

Millions of fathers lack parental responsibility

Many fathers may be surprised to learn about their parental responsibility rights and how to secure them

Re Poundstretcher: cross-class cramdown survives even when six landlord classes say no

The Chancery Division sanctions Poundstretcher's restructuring plan despite six dissenting landlord classes, applying the Adler and Petrofac framework.

Ponsford v Sali: a property partnership's messy divorce shows why documentation wins partnership disputes

The Chancery Division takes a pragmatic, evidence based approach to untangling a property partnership built on undocumented cash dealings.

North Somerset District Council v Secretary of State: failing the flood sequential test is not the end of the story

The Planning Court confirms that a failed flood risk sequential test still gets weighed in the planning balance, not treated as an automatic refusal.

Thomas Armstrong (Aggregates) v Housing Secretary: when landfill buries a quarry's right to be reviewed

The Planning Court applies Pilkington and Hillside to find a 1954 quarry permission can no longer be revived under the ROMP regime.

Clerkenwell Lifestyle v HG Construction: be careful what you call "agreed" in extension of time correspondence

The TCC enforces a £955,943 adjudication award after rejecting a contractor's late attempt to recast email exchanges as a binding settlement.

Ward v Donnellan: when both sides lie, "no order for costs" is not a free pass

The Court of Appeal overturns a no order for costs ruling, finding a judge let a dishonest claimant off too lightly.

London Borough of Camden v BW: when a single missing fact can decide a capacity case

The Court of Protection finds an expert's failure to explore one consequence, losing a placement, was enough to undermine his capacity assessment.

Griffiths v Essex County Council: EAT clarifies causation in discrimination remedy awards and sends pension loss back for recalculation

A single act of indirect disability discrimination can ground a full loss of earnings award, even where a later constructive dismissal claim was framed only...