News Editor, Solicitors Journal

Safe cycling judicial review

8 Dec 2022|60 Seconds|Add your comment

The news in 60 seconds

On 8 December, a judicial review hearing was held in the High Court regarding the safe cycling provision on Kensington High Street. Better Streets for Kensington and Chelsea (Better Streets), were represented by law firm Leigh Day. It claims a decision by the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea not to reinstate cycle lanes it had removed after only seven weeks of an 18-month trial, before installation of the scheme had even been completed, is unlawful. The hearing was adjourned until 13 Jan 2023.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Comments

Latest Articles

Entertainment deal activity rises on IP demand in 2026

Entertainment M&A accelerates across 2026 as stabilising finance and strong IP drive acquisition-led growth

Reforms to solicitors’ costs must be evidence-based

The Law Society has expressed support for reforms to solicitors’ costs rules, stressing the need for evidence-based proposals that ensure fairness for clients and solicitors...

New digital patent services improve access

A suite of digital services for applying, managing, and renewing UK patents has been launched by the IPO

Rowntree v Performing Right Society: Court of Appeal dismisses Blur drummer's black box royalties class action

Pro rata distribution of unmatched music royalties is not an abuse of dominance without a viable counterfactual, rules Court of Appeal.

City Outdoor Media v Secretary of State: Court of Appeal confirms scope of inquiry for site-wide advertising discontinuance notices

Inspector need not assess every class of deemed consent when upholding a site-wide discontinuance notice, Court of Appeal rules.

Kensington Mortgage Company v Price: mortgagee in possession must register as Welsh landlord before serving possession notice

High Court rules that a mortgagee cannot separate its status under Welsh housing legislation to avoid landlord registration requirements.

Weis v Greater Manchester Combined Authority: Court of Appeal defines CAT's review powers in landmark Subsidy Control Act ruling

First Court of Appeal decision under the 2022 Act confirms the CAT determines for itself whether a subsidy exists.

Bay Farm Power v Prescott: Upper Tribunal cuts anaerobic digester rateable values and rejects sector-wide tone argument

Standard 10% risk uplift held insufficient for AD plants as Tribunal finds working capital omission undermines primary valuations.

Privatbank v Kolomoisky: ring-fenced funds released to bank on dismissal of appeal, rules High Court

Costs incurred but unpaid before the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal cannot be drawn from ring-fenced accounts.

Young v Royal Mail Group: EAT dismisses trade union protection appeal over WhatsApp threat

WhatsApp posts during CWU industrial dispute fell outside statutory protection, rules Employment Appeal Tribunal.

UN opinion on IPP sentences imminent

The United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention is set to review the legality of IPP sentences

Employers unprepared for major law changes

New research reveals that 91% of employers are not fully prepared for the Employment Rights Act reforms ahead

New rules could change cohabitation rights

Unmarried couples in the UK may soon gain enhanced legal protections after a government consultation process

SJ Interview: Chris Spelman

Chris Spelman is a partner in DWF's London dispute resolution team, specialising in financial services litigation and investigations, whistleblowing matters, and class action, securities and...

When the rules can't keep up

From Westminster to the courts, the rules are being written faster than they can settle