Sign Up for our Free Newsletter
menu
Solicitors Journal Homepage
EditorSolicitors Journal

PRICE TRANSPARENCY

Wed Jan 02 2019News
PRICE TRANSPARENCY

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has committed to carrying out 'web sweeps' of around 500 law firms in the coming months in a bid to spot check compliance with its new price transparency rules. Speaking at a press briefing earlier this month, the regulator's chief executive Paul Philip said the intention was to take a 'proportionate approach' but he warned that firms tempted to shirk their obligations, that if they do they are 'forcing us into taking disproportionate action when you should just comply and move forward'. He added that the web sweep was part of a 'standard auditing approach' to price transparency.
AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

Jeanne Kelly elected President of the British Irish Chamber of Commerce

Fri Sep 29 2023

Families continue to be victims of a broken justice system

Fri Sep 29 2023

Call for compensation scheme extension to help more abuse survivors

Fri Sep 29 2023

Legal job numbers increase but applications decline

Fri Sep 29 2023

BARBRI candidates outperform SRA average by 13%

Fri Sep 29 2023

Justice delayed as thousands of cases wait more than two years to be heard

Thu Sep 28 2023

Solicitors warned over immigration services

Thu Sep 28 2023

New report highlights the transformative effects of domestic abuse training on family lawyers

Wed Sep 27 2023

Asylum seekers stranded on Diego Garcia win challenge against return to Sri Lanka

Wed Sep 27 2023
FeaturedFines to increase for employers without robust employment screening
Fines to increase for employers without robust employment screening
NewsMon Oct 02 2023
Fines to increase for employers without robust employment screening
With the fines for employing illegal workers in the UK tripling, employment screening and identity expert, Sterling, has urged firms to ensure they have robust vetting and screening in place, no matter what sector they operate in.
IBA publishes for the first time a legal agenda identifying profession’s most pressing concerns
IBA publishes for the first time a legal agenda identifying profession’s most pressing concerns
NewsMon Oct 02 2023
IBA publishes for the first time a legal agenda identifying profession’s most pressing concerns
The International Bar Association (IBA) has published the IBA Legal Agenda (the Agenda) – a document that identifies the most pressing challenges facing the legal profession over the next five years (2023–2028)
Black History Month: Legal profession celebrates influential Black women lawyers
Black History Month: Legal profession celebrates influential Black women lawyers
NewsMon Oct 02 2023
Black History Month: Legal profession celebrates influential Black women lawyers
Solicitors in England and Wales will celebrate Black History Month (1 October) by embracing the ’Saluting our Sisters’ theme, which highlights the role Black women have had in shaping history, inspiring change and building communities.
The Law Society intervention ensures liberal approach to dealing with concurrent problems on legal aid
The Law Society intervention ensures liberal approach to dealing with concurrent problems on legal aid
NewsFri Sep 29 2023
The Law Society intervention ensures liberal approach to dealing with concurrent problems on legal aid
The High Court has today (29 September) handed down its judgment in R v Lawstop, a judicial review case where the Law Society intervened.
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
SJ InterviewMon Sep 25 2023
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
Hannah Ambrose is an international arbitration partner at Herbert Smith Freehills. She talks to Solicitors Journal about her practice and the Law Commission's recent proposals to update the Arbitration Act 1996.
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
ForewordFri Sep 08 2023
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?

Under the law, should your right to express your opinion – be it on politics, the environment, abortion, or anything else – trump my right to go about my business unhindered, whether or not I happen to agree with your opinion?