Peter Knust joins Dorsey in London

22 Apr 2026Appointments

Peter Knust has joined Dorsey & Whitney LLP as Of Counsel, enhancing its London office capabilities in cross-border finance and restructuring matters

Previously at Fieldfisher for three years, Peter has specialised in corporate trust work, advising numerous clients on diverse finance transactions including structured finance and project finance. His expertise extends to post-closing issues such as amendments and restructurings, while also focusing on cross-border matters that involve both English and U.S. law. This move is expected to further strengthen Dorsey’s capabilities in cross-border transactions, especially at the intersection of UK and U.S. legal considerations.

Eric Lopez Schnabel, Co-Leader of the Finance & Restructuring Practice Group at Dorsey, noted that “Peter is highly regarded for English law financings, restructurings, and seamless transatlantic collaboration,” emphasising the value he will bring to the firm. In response, Knust stated, “Dorsey’s collaborative culture and existing strength in corporate trust made it the obvious choice for me,” highlighting his enthusiasm for contributing to the firm’s mission of supporting clients in complex transactions. He is also recognised as a Recommended Lawyer by Legal 500 and as a Notable Practitioner by IFLR

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Latest Articles

Employment tribunal cases rising sharply

Recent Ministry of Justice figures reveal a significant increase in open Employment Tribunal cases and challenges faced by employers

SRA updates guidance for litigation supervision

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has enhanced its supervision guidelines to clarify litigation conduct after recent court rulings

Millions of fathers lack parental responsibility

Many fathers may be surprised to learn about their parental responsibility rights and how to secure them

Re Poundstretcher: cross-class cramdown survives even when six landlord classes say no

The Chancery Division sanctions Poundstretcher's restructuring plan despite six dissenting landlord classes, applying the Adler and Petrofac framework.

Ponsford v Sali: a property partnership's messy divorce shows why documentation wins partnership disputes

The Chancery Division takes a pragmatic, evidence based approach to untangling a property partnership built on undocumented cash dealings.

North Somerset District Council v Secretary of State: failing the flood sequential test is not the end of the story

The Planning Court confirms that a failed flood risk sequential test still gets weighed in the planning balance, not treated as an automatic refusal.

Thomas Armstrong (Aggregates) v Housing Secretary: when landfill buries a quarry's right to be reviewed

The Planning Court applies Pilkington and Hillside to find a 1954 quarry permission can no longer be revived under the ROMP regime.

Clerkenwell Lifestyle v HG Construction: be careful what you call "agreed" in extension of time correspondence

The TCC enforces a £955,943 adjudication award after rejecting a contractor's late attempt to recast email exchanges as a binding settlement.

Ward v Donnellan: when both sides lie, "no order for costs" is not a free pass

The Court of Appeal overturns a no order for costs ruling, finding a judge let a dishonest claimant off too lightly.

London Borough of Camden v BW: when a single missing fact can decide a capacity case

The Court of Protection finds an expert's failure to explore one consequence, losing a placement, was enough to undermine his capacity assessment.

Griffiths v Essex County Council: EAT clarifies causation in discrimination remedy awards and sends pension loss back for recalculation

A single act of indirect disability discrimination can ground a full loss of earnings award, even where a later constructive dismissal claim was framed only...