Partners unite to fight cyber crime

17 Sept 2025News

Security Minister Dan Jarvis highlighted the importance of collaboration in combatting cyber crime and fraud together with various sectors and organisations across the UK

On 9 September 2025, Security Minister Dan Jarvis delivered a significant speech at the City of London Police Authority Board, emphasising the critical need for collaboration in fighting cyber crime and fraud. Addressing the audience at the historic Drapers' Hall, Jarvis reflected on the long-standing nature of the venue and its resilient presence through the ages. He appreciated the collective work done by professionals from various sectors, stating how the individual stories behind the statistics showcase the devastating impact of these crimes. Jarvis underscored the government's commitment, mentioning the establishment of the National Fraud Squad and the Online Safety Act, highlighting successful international partnerships and initiatives that focus on tackling both fraud and cyber threats. He elaborated on the need for a whole-of-society approach to combat these challenges effectively and proposed an expanded Fraud Strategy that will enhance efforts to disrupt criminal activities and safeguard the public. As he concluded, he urged stakeholders to collaborate and adapt strategies that align with evolving threats, voicing optimism about the future efforts to create a safer society.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Latest Articles

Employment tribunal cases rising sharply

Recent Ministry of Justice figures reveal a significant increase in open Employment Tribunal cases and challenges faced by employers

SRA updates guidance for litigation supervision

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has enhanced its supervision guidelines to clarify litigation conduct after recent court rulings

Millions of fathers lack parental responsibility

Many fathers may be surprised to learn about their parental responsibility rights and how to secure them

Re Poundstretcher: cross-class cramdown survives even when six landlord classes say no

The Chancery Division sanctions Poundstretcher's restructuring plan despite six dissenting landlord classes, applying the Adler and Petrofac framework.

Ponsford v Sali: a property partnership's messy divorce shows why documentation wins partnership disputes

The Chancery Division takes a pragmatic, evidence based approach to untangling a property partnership built on undocumented cash dealings.

North Somerset District Council v Secretary of State: failing the flood sequential test is not the end of the story

The Planning Court confirms that a failed flood risk sequential test still gets weighed in the planning balance, not treated as an automatic refusal.

Thomas Armstrong (Aggregates) v Housing Secretary: when landfill buries a quarry's right to be reviewed

The Planning Court applies Pilkington and Hillside to find a 1954 quarry permission can no longer be revived under the ROMP regime.

Clerkenwell Lifestyle v HG Construction: be careful what you call "agreed" in extension of time correspondence

The TCC enforces a £955,943 adjudication award after rejecting a contractor's late attempt to recast email exchanges as a binding settlement.

Ward v Donnellan: when both sides lie, "no order for costs" is not a free pass

The Court of Appeal overturns a no order for costs ruling, finding a judge let a dishonest claimant off too lightly.

London Borough of Camden v BW: when a single missing fact can decide a capacity case

The Court of Protection finds an expert's failure to explore one consequence, losing a placement, was enough to undermine his capacity assessment.

Griffiths v Essex County Council: EAT clarifies causation in discrimination remedy awards and sends pension loss back for recalculation

A single act of indirect disability discrimination can ground a full loss of earnings award, even where a later constructive dismissal claim was framed only...