Osborne Clarke enhances AI team with expert

16 Jul 2025Appointments

Osborne Clarke strengthens its AI team by appointing Marc Ohrendorf, aiming for enhanced international collaboration on AI initiatives

International legal practice Osborne Clarke is taking a significant step to bolster its artificial intelligence capabilities with the appointment of Marc Ohrendorf as Chief of Staff to the firm's AI Management Board. In this pivotal role, Marc will facilitate greater international collaboration on AI initiatives within the firm and will be instrumental in the execution of Osborne Clarke’s global AI strategy.

Osborne Clarke has made a name for itself as a pioneer in the legal industry, consistently focusing on providing innovative and technology-driven legal services. The firm was among the first to develop and deploy its AI chatbot, optimising internal workflows and showcasing its commitment to integrating AI into everyday operations.

Marc Ohrendorf brings over a decade of experience in digital product management and legal technology to his new position. He is also known for founding and hosting the career podcast ‘Irgendwas mit Recht’, which has highlighted advancements and personalities within the legal field since 2018. His previous roles at Wolters Kluwer Germany (LTO.de) and the IWW Institute saw him lead initiatives focused on digital business models and product development. Additionally, Marc serves as an honorary director at the Bucerius Centre on the Legal Profession, exploring the intersection of law, digitalisation, and AI.

Gereon Abendroth, Chair of the international AI Management Board at Osborne Clarke, shared his enthusiasm for Marc’s appointment, stating that “the transformation of legal services through AI is one of the defining challenges of our time – and also a tremendous opportunity for Osborne Clarke. We’re delighted to welcome Marc Ohrendorf, a professional who combines strategic vision, technological know-how, and deep insight into the legal market.”

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Employment tribunal cases rising sharply

Recent Ministry of Justice figures reveal a significant increase in open Employment Tribunal cases and challenges faced by employers

SRA updates guidance for litigation supervision

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has enhanced its supervision guidelines to clarify litigation conduct after recent court rulings

Millions of fathers lack parental responsibility

Many fathers may be surprised to learn about their parental responsibility rights and how to secure them

Re Poundstretcher: cross-class cramdown survives even when six landlord classes say no

The Chancery Division sanctions Poundstretcher's restructuring plan despite six dissenting landlord classes, applying the Adler and Petrofac framework.

Ponsford v Sali: a property partnership's messy divorce shows why documentation wins partnership disputes

The Chancery Division takes a pragmatic, evidence based approach to untangling a property partnership built on undocumented cash dealings.

North Somerset District Council v Secretary of State: failing the flood sequential test is not the end of the story

The Planning Court confirms that a failed flood risk sequential test still gets weighed in the planning balance, not treated as an automatic refusal.

Thomas Armstrong (Aggregates) v Housing Secretary: when landfill buries a quarry's right to be reviewed

The Planning Court applies Pilkington and Hillside to find a 1954 quarry permission can no longer be revived under the ROMP regime.

Clerkenwell Lifestyle v HG Construction: be careful what you call "agreed" in extension of time correspondence

The TCC enforces a £955,943 adjudication award after rejecting a contractor's late attempt to recast email exchanges as a binding settlement.

Ward v Donnellan: when both sides lie, "no order for costs" is not a free pass

The Court of Appeal overturns a no order for costs ruling, finding a judge let a dishonest claimant off too lightly.

London Borough of Camden v BW: when a single missing fact can decide a capacity case

The Court of Protection finds an expert's failure to explore one consequence, losing a placement, was enough to undermine his capacity assessment.

Griffiths v Essex County Council: EAT clarifies causation in discrimination remedy awards and sends pension loss back for recalculation

A single act of indirect disability discrimination can ground a full loss of earnings award, even where a later constructive dismissal claim was framed only...