Opening of the legal year 2025

2 Oct 2025News

On 1 October 2025, the legal year officially commenced in England and Wales during a historic ceremony

The Opening of the Legal Year in England and Wales took place on Wednesday, 1 October 2025, at Westminster Abbey. This traditional event, steeped in history, marks the beginning of the legal year, which is divided into four distinct terms, starting with the Michaelmas term. The ceremony maintained its age-old customs, including a solemn invocation for guidance and wisdom.

In attendance were prominent figures from the legal community, including Treasury Solicitor Susanna McGibbon KC (Hon) and the department's Directors General Mel Nebhrajani CB, Sarah Goom, and Caroline Croft. They were joined by Attorney General Lord Hermer KC and Solicitor General Ellie Reeves MP. This year, before the ceremony at the Abbey, the Lord Chancellor and Solicitor General were sworn in at the Royal Courts of Justice, highlighting the formal nature of the proceedings, which featured addresses from influential representatives of the Bench, Bar, and Law Society.

Susanna McGibbon KC (Hon), the Treasury Solicitor and Permanent Secretary of the Government Legal Department, addressed the gathered audience, stating that this new year brings fresh opportunities to strengthen the partnership between government and the profession, building on our shared commitment to justice and excellence. She also noted that today's event is a good time to celebrate the role of government lawyers in supporting the priorities of the government of the day through developing legislation, negotiating international agreements and conducting litigation in the highest courts of the land.

The Government Legal Department remains pivotal as the principal legal adviser to the government, committed to upholding the rule of law and ensuring governance meets the highest standards of legal practice.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Employment tribunal cases rising sharply

Recent Ministry of Justice figures reveal a significant increase in open Employment Tribunal cases and challenges faced by employers

SRA updates guidance for litigation supervision

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has enhanced its supervision guidelines to clarify litigation conduct after recent court rulings

Millions of fathers lack parental responsibility

Many fathers may be surprised to learn about their parental responsibility rights and how to secure them

Re Poundstretcher: cross-class cramdown survives even when six landlord classes say no

The Chancery Division sanctions Poundstretcher's restructuring plan despite six dissenting landlord classes, applying the Adler and Petrofac framework.

Ponsford v Sali: a property partnership's messy divorce shows why documentation wins partnership disputes

The Chancery Division takes a pragmatic, evidence based approach to untangling a property partnership built on undocumented cash dealings.

North Somerset District Council v Secretary of State: failing the flood sequential test is not the end of the story

The Planning Court confirms that a failed flood risk sequential test still gets weighed in the planning balance, not treated as an automatic refusal.

Thomas Armstrong (Aggregates) v Housing Secretary: when landfill buries a quarry's right to be reviewed

The Planning Court applies Pilkington and Hillside to find a 1954 quarry permission can no longer be revived under the ROMP regime.

Clerkenwell Lifestyle v HG Construction: be careful what you call "agreed" in extension of time correspondence

The TCC enforces a £955,943 adjudication award after rejecting a contractor's late attempt to recast email exchanges as a binding settlement.

Ward v Donnellan: when both sides lie, "no order for costs" is not a free pass

The Court of Appeal overturns a no order for costs ruling, finding a judge let a dishonest claimant off too lightly.

London Borough of Camden v BW: when a single missing fact can decide a capacity case

The Court of Protection finds an expert's failure to explore one consequence, losing a placement, was enough to undermine his capacity assessment.

Griffiths v Essex County Council: EAT clarifies causation in discrimination remedy awards and sends pension loss back for recalculation

A single act of indirect disability discrimination can ground a full loss of earnings award, even where a later constructive dismissal claim was framed only...