LoginSubscribe Now
Follow Us
Sign up to our free newsletter
Solicitors Journal LogoInforming the legal profession since 1856

Find the knowledge you need from the SJ library of over 20,000 legal articles

Search now
Solicitors Journal Logo
  • Legal News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Practice Notes
  • Business
  • International
  • Court Reports
  • AI Search
  • Digital Edition
  • Subscription Options
  • Advertise with Us
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • FAQ
    • Guide to Authors
Solicitors Journal

Informing the legal profession since 1856.

Follow us

Topics

  • Legal News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Practice Notes
  • Business
  • International
  • Court Reports

About

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • FAQ
  • Guide to Authors

Subscribe

  • Subscription Options
  • Digital Edition
  • Free Newsletter

Editorial

editorial@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

Subscriptions

subscriptions@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

Advertising

Advertise with usadvertising@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

© 2026 Solicitors Journal in partnership with the International In-house Counsel Journal

ISSN 0038-1047  ·  Images: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors

Terms and ConditionsCookie PolicyPrivacy PolicyPLS Clear logoCopyright & permissions

Ockenden Report reveals serious maternity failings

25 Jun 2026News
Share:
Ockenden Report reveals serious maternity failings

The newly published Ockenden Report highlights systemic issues in maternity care affecting over two thousand families

The Ockenden Report, the largest maternity review in NHS history, has been released, detailing longstanding issues within maternity and neonatal care that have drastically impacted numerous families. According to the findings, a significant proportion of harm could have been avoided; approximately 21% of maternity cases and 6% of neonatal cases were deemed potentially preventable. There were consistent failures noted regarding risk assessment, fetal monitoring, and the escalation of care to senior clinicians when necessary.

The report also indicates that adherence to clinical standards was inconsistent, with deviations from national guidelines surrounding areas such as neonatal cooling and hypoglycaemia management leading to additional avoidable risks. Patients and families frequently reported detrimental experiences, often feeling dismissed or neglected within a fragmented care system exhibiting a lack of compassion, especially after serious incidents.

In response to the report's findings, Bernadette McGhie, a consultant at Russell-Cooke, expressed that “Sadly, the findings of the Ockenden Report will not come as a surprise to those of us who regularly support women and families affected by avoidable harm in maternity care." She pointed out the repeating issues over time, saying, “The same failings – poor escalation, missed opportunities to intervene and a failure to listen – appear to have been repeated over many years.”

McGhie went on to highlight the impact on families, noting that “At the heart of this report are families whose lives have been permanently altered, whether through bereavement, life-changing injury or lasting psychological trauma." She expressed concern over the lack of transparency, commenting, “too often, that harm is compounded by poor communication and a lack of openness about what went wrong.”

From a legal perspective, McGhie identified severe concerns regarding the failure to learn from past incidents, stating, “Families are frequently told that lessons will be learned, but where the same issues recur, that promise rings hollow.” She stressed the necessity of meaningful change resulting from the report, emphasizing the need for “stronger accountability, better resourcing and a culture where both staff and patients are listened to before harm occurs.”

The Ockenden Report represents the second such review into maternity failings within a decade, necessitating immediate and sustained efforts to ensure the welfare of mothers and their babies across the healthcare system. As McGhie concluded, “This should serve as a wake-up call not just for Nottingham University Hospitals, but for maternity services more widely.”

Latest Articles

The Ockenden Report, the largest maternity review in NHS history, has been released, detailing longstanding issues within maternity and neonatal care that have drastically impacted numerous families. According to the findings, a significant proportion of harm could have been avoided; approximately 21% of maternity cases and 6% of neonatal cases were deemed potentially preventable. There were consistent failures noted regarding risk assessment, fetal monitoring, and the escalation of care to senior clinicians when necessary.

The report also indicates that adherence to clinical standards was inconsistent, with deviations from national guidelines surrounding areas such as neonatal cooling and hypoglycaemia management leading to additional avoidable risks. Patients and families frequently reported detrimental experiences, often feeling dismissed or neglected within a fragmented care system exhibiting a lack of compassion, especially after serious incidents.

In response to the report's findings, Bernadette McGhie, a consultant at Russell-Cooke, expressed that “Sadly, the findings of the Ockenden Report will not come as a surprise to those of us who regularly support women and families affected by avoidable harm in maternity care." She pointed out the repeating issues over time, saying, “The same failings – poor escalation, missed opportunities to intervene and a failure to listen – appear to have been repeated over many years.”

McGhie went on to highlight the impact on families, noting that “At the heart of this report are families whose lives have been permanently altered, whether through bereavement, life-changing injury or lasting psychological trauma." She expressed concern over the lack of transparency, commenting, “too often, that harm is compounded by poor communication and a lack of openness about what went wrong.”

From a legal perspective, McGhie identified severe concerns regarding the failure to learn from past incidents, stating, “Families are frequently told that lessons will be learned, but where the same issues recur, that promise rings hollow.” She stressed the necessity of meaningful change resulting from the report, emphasizing the need for “stronger accountability, better resourcing and a culture where both staff and patients are listened to before harm occurs.”

The Ockenden Report represents the second such review into maternity failings within a decade, necessitating immediate and sustained efforts to ensure the welfare of mothers and their babies across the healthcare system. As McGhie concluded, “This should serve as a wake-up call not just for Nottingham University Hospitals, but for maternity services more widely.”

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|PLS LogoCopyright & permissions
SFO and HMRC use crypto orders
Solicitors Journal

SFO and HMRC use crypto orders

Gherson Solicitors LLP has shed light on the use of Crypto Wallet Freezing and Forfeiture Orders by UK agencies
News25 Jun 2026
FCA to assess integrity of lawyers
Solicitors Journal

FCA to assess integrity of lawyers

HM Treasury has announced that the FCA will regulate AML for legal and accounting professionals in the UK
News25 Jun 2026
UK businesses advised to review contracts
Solicitors Journal

UK businesses advised to review contracts

UK businesses with Australian operations are urged to review employment contracts due to proposed non-compete reforms that could affect enforceability from 2027
News25 Jun 2026
Estatesearch expands international search services
Solicitors Journal

Estatesearch expands international search services

Legal tech firm Estatesearch has launched International Financial Profile searches to aid estate administration globally
News25 Jun 2026
Warner Bros Discovery and Paramount v Nokia: Patents Court sets interim RAND payment for global video streaming licence
Solicitors Journal

Warner Bros Discovery and Paramount v Nokia: Patents Court sets interim RAND payment for global video streaming licence

Patents Court determines interim RAND payment for Nokia's video portfolio in landmark streaming dispute.
Court Report24 Jun 2026
Barclays Bank UK Plc & Ors v Financial Ombudsman Service: High Court quashes FOS jurisdiction decisions over unfair credit relationships
Solicitors Journal

Barclays Bank UK Plc & Ors v Financial Ombudsman Service: High Court quashes FOS jurisdiction decisions over unfair credit relationships

High Court rules FOS exceeded its jurisdiction in four consumer credit complaints.
Court Report24 Jun 2026
Staniak v District Court of Lublin: High Court refuses permission on passage of time in Polish extradition appeal
Solicitors Journal

Staniak v District Court of Lublin: High Court refuses permission on passage of time in Polish extradition appeal

Permission refused on fugitivity, exceptional circumstances and oppression in long-running Poland extradition case.
Court Report24 Jun 2026
Barclay v Transport Secretary: High Court dismisses challenges to Gatwick Airport's Northern Runway Project DCO
Solicitors Journal

Barclay v Transport Secretary: High Court dismisses challenges to Gatwick Airport's Northern Runway Project DCO

Planning Court dismisses challenges to Gatwick Airport's Northern Runway Project Development Consent Order on all grounds.
Court Report24 Jun 2026
Hipgnosis Music v Merck Mercuriadis: High Court rules music publishing catalogues idea was not a corporate opportunity
Solicitors Journal

Hipgnosis Music v Merck Mercuriadis: High Court rules music publishing catalogues idea was not a corporate opportunity

High Court dismisses Hipgnosis Music's claims over diverted music catalogues corporate opportunity.
Court Report24 Jun 2026
Advance Magazine Publishers v Cornucopia Entertainment: IPEC finds Vanity Fair and GQ marks infringed by ticket advertising
Solicitors Journal

Advance Magazine Publishers v Cornucopia Entertainment: IPEC finds Vanity Fair and GQ marks infringed by ticket advertising

IPEC finds Condé Nast's Vanity Fair and GQ trade marks infringed by concierge ticket advertising.
Court Report24 Jun 2026
R (Hylton) v Medway Council: High Court quashes decisions refusing interim care support pending reassessment
Solicitors Journal

R (Hylton) v Medway Council: High Court quashes decisions refusing interim care support pending reassessment

High Court quashes Medway's interim care decisions for treating reassessment as a condition of support.
Court Report24 Jun 2026
Regal BA v Jun Zhang: High Court awards damages over failed sale of £16.9m mansion formerly rented by Harry Kane
Solicitors Journal

Regal BA v Jun Zhang: High Court awards damages over failed sale of £16.9m mansion formerly rented by Harry Kane

Developer awarded damages after buyer twice fails to complete purchase of Harry Kane's former home.
Court Report24 Jun 2026
SJ Interview: Chris Spelman
Solicitors Journal

SJ Interview: Chris Spelman

Chris Spelman is a partner in DWF's London dispute resolution team, specialising in financial services litigation and investigations, whistleblowing matters, and class action, securities and...
Interview1 Jun 2026
When the rules can't keep up
Solicitors Journal

When the rules can't keep up

From Westminster to the courts, the rules are being written faster than they can settle
Foreword1 Jun 2026