LoginSubscribe Now
Follow Us
Sign up to our free newsletter
Solicitors Journal LogoInforming the legal profession since 1856

Find the knowledge you need from the SJ library of over 20,000 legal articles

Search now
Solicitors Journal Logo
  • Legal News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Practice Notes
  • Business
  • International
  • Court Reports
  • AI Search
  • Digital Edition
  • Subscription Options
  • Advertise with Us
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • FAQ
    • Guide to Authors
Solicitors Journal

Informing the legal profession since 1856.

Follow us

Topics

  • Legal News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Practice Notes
  • Business
  • International
  • Court Reports

About

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • FAQ
  • Guide to Authors

Subscribe

  • Subscription Options
  • Digital Edition
  • Free Newsletter

Editorial

editorial@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

Subscriptions

subscriptions@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

Advertising

Advertise with usadvertising@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

© 2026 Solicitors Journal in partnership with the International In-house Counsel Journal

ISSN 0038-1047  ·  Images: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors

Terms and ConditionsCookie PolicyPrivacy PolicyPLS Clear logoCopyright & permissions

New scheme gives rape victims voice

6 Jul 2026|News|Add your comment
Share:
New scheme gives rape victims voice

Survivors of sexual assault can request case reviews before final decisions are made on evidence

The Solicitor General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, recently announced the national rollout of the Early Victims’ Right to Review (VRR) scheme, allowing rape and sexual assault survivors across England and Wales to request a review of their cases before a final decision not to pursue evidence is made. Launched in the West Midlands in June 2025, this vital scheme aims to empower victims by providing them with the option of having their cases reassessed by a different prosecutor, ensuring that they can continue to seek justice if warranted. This national rollout will take effect on 13 July 2026, following a successful pilot in four CPS Areas: West Midlands, North West, Yorkshire, and Humberside, alongside Cymru-Wales.

The initiative, which forms a central element of the government's Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG) strategy, is seen as a significant step towards transforming how the justice system engages with victims of rape and serious sexual offences. Victims can feel reassured knowing that their cases will receive the consideration needed at such critical junctures. If the assigned prosecutor disagrees with the initial decision taken, the investigation can proceed, allowing survivors a second chance to pursue justice.

Ellie Reeves KC MP stated, “Rape and sexual assault cause devastating, long-lasting harm, and every brave victim who comes forward deserves to know their case will be treated with dignity.” She added, “Violence against women and girls is my top priority, and the Early Victims’ Right to Review rollout is a landmark moment.” The Solicitor General emphasised that this rollout embodies the government’s determination to halve violence against women and girls within a decade while ensuring victims are afforded fairness and dignity.

Siobhan Blake, National CPS Lead for Rape and Serious Sexual Offences, remarked, “For survivors of rape and sexual offences, the possibility their abuser may never face justice can be deeply distressing.” She acknowledged that while CPS prosecutors generally get it right, mistakes can occur, and the opportunity for review can make a crucial difference for victims.

Jade Blue McCrossen-Nethercott, a victim advocate, added, “The CPS's commitment to roll out the early Victims' Right to Review pilot nationally is a landmark moment for victims and survivors.” She shared her own experience, highlighting how critical timely reviews are to prevent permanent, unjust decisions. McCrossen-Nethercott articulated the importance of having the option to contest decisions before they become final, noting, “This pilot recognises that victims deserve the opportunity to have decisions reconsidered before they become final.”

Victims' Commissioner Claire Waxman OBE also supported the expansion of the VRR scheme, stating, “It is fantastic to see the CPS listening and responding to victims' experiences.” She offered gratitude to advocates like McCrossen-Nethercott for their efforts in driving this essential progress, believing that the national rollout will prevent many victims from facing injustices without recourse.

The VRR initiative demonstrates a significant advancement towards creating a more responsive justice system that not only prioritises the voices of victims but also ensures they are treated with the respect and seriousness they deserve. As the CPS prepares for this nationwide implementation, the commitment to providing a robust mechanism for review is a hopeful sign for survivors seeking justice in difficult circumstances.

Comments

Latest Articles

The Solicitor General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, recently announced the national rollout of the Early Victims’ Right to Review (VRR) scheme, allowing rape and sexual assault survivors across England and Wales to request a review of their cases before a final decision not to pursue evidence is made. Launched in the West Midlands in June 2025, this vital scheme aims to empower victims by providing them with the option of having their cases reassessed by a different prosecutor, ensuring that they can continue to seek justice if warranted. This national rollout will take effect on 13 July 2026, following a successful pilot in four CPS Areas: West Midlands, North West, Yorkshire, and Humberside, alongside Cymru-Wales.

The initiative, which forms a central element of the government's Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG) strategy, is seen as a significant step towards transforming how the justice system engages with victims of rape and serious sexual offences. Victims can feel reassured knowing that their cases will receive the consideration needed at such critical junctures. If the assigned prosecutor disagrees with the initial decision taken, the investigation can proceed, allowing survivors a second chance to pursue justice.

Ellie Reeves KC MP stated, “Rape and sexual assault cause devastating, long-lasting harm, and every brave victim who comes forward deserves to know their case will be treated with dignity.” She added, “Violence against women and girls is my top priority, and the Early Victims’ Right to Review rollout is a landmark moment.” The Solicitor General emphasised that this rollout embodies the government’s determination to halve violence against women and girls within a decade while ensuring victims are afforded fairness and dignity.

Siobhan Blake, National CPS Lead for Rape and Serious Sexual Offences, remarked, “For survivors of rape and sexual offences, the possibility their abuser may never face justice can be deeply distressing.” She acknowledged that while CPS prosecutors generally get it right, mistakes can occur, and the opportunity for review can make a crucial difference for victims.

Jade Blue McCrossen-Nethercott, a victim advocate, added, “The CPS's commitment to roll out the early Victims' Right to Review pilot nationally is a landmark moment for victims and survivors.” She shared her own experience, highlighting how critical timely reviews are to prevent permanent, unjust decisions. McCrossen-Nethercott articulated the importance of having the option to contest decisions before they become final, noting, “This pilot recognises that victims deserve the opportunity to have decisions reconsidered before they become final.”

Victims' Commissioner Claire Waxman OBE also supported the expansion of the VRR scheme, stating, “It is fantastic to see the CPS listening and responding to victims' experiences.” She offered gratitude to advocates like McCrossen-Nethercott for their efforts in driving this essential progress, believing that the national rollout will prevent many victims from facing injustices without recourse.

The VRR initiative demonstrates a significant advancement towards creating a more responsive justice system that not only prioritises the voices of victims but also ensures they are treated with the respect and seriousness they deserve. As the CPS prepares for this nationwide implementation, the commitment to providing a robust mechanism for review is a hopeful sign for survivors seeking justice in difficult circumstances.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|PLS LogoCopyright & permissions
Unconscionability and the claimant's conduct in proprietary estoppel
Solicitors Journal

Unconscionability and the claimant's conduct in proprietary estoppel

How a claimant's behaviour towards the legal owner, before and after judgment, can bar or modify equitable relief
Feature6 Jul 2026
Calls for health checks in workplaces
Solicitors Journal

Calls for health checks in workplaces

Labour adviser Sir Charlie Mayfield urges health checks for employees starting new jobs to reduce sickness levels
News6 Jul 2026
Free lesson plans to teach law
Solicitors Journal

Free lesson plans to teach law

The Attorney General's Office has launched free lesson plans for schools in England and Wales to enhance understanding of the rule of law and legal...
News6 Jul 2026

Wine Enterprise Investment Scheme v Crowe: a Pyrrhic victory leaves the auditor as the successful party on costs

A claimant that recovered a fraction of its audit-negligence claim must pay most of the defendant's costs.
Court Report3 Jul 2026

Pattinson v Winsor: committal application over judicial harassment withdrawn on compassionate grounds

Contempt application against a brother-in-law is withdrawn by consent after arrest amid serious welfare concerns.
Court Report3 Jul 2026

R (Castro Guallichico) v Southwark: High Court dismisses challenge to a council's direct offer housing list

Judicial review over a family's rehousing fails on procedure, transparency and equality duty grounds.
Court Report3 Jul 2026

Harvey v Heaver: High Court gives first authoritative reading of the fitness for human habitation test

Landmark ruling interprets the section 9A fitness covenant and orders a landlord to repair an unfit home.
Court Report3 Jul 2026

Hillingdon v Springwell Lane Metal Recycling: High Court grants final injunction to halt unlawful scrap yard

Deputy judge orders a Green Belt scrap metal operation to cease after repeated enforcement failures.
Court Report3 Jul 2026
Gable Insurance v Dewsall: Court of Appeal upholds finding that a director's excess payments were not dishonest
Solicitors Journal

Gable Insurance v Dewsall: Court of Appeal upholds finding that a director's excess payments were not dishonest

Appeal judges decline to disturb a trial ruling that certain payments involved no dishonesty.
Court Report3 Jul 2026
Irama v Formark: High Court refuses permission to appeal and imposes a civil restraint order
Solicitors Journal

Irama v Formark: High Court refuses permission to appeal and imposes a civil restraint order

Griffiths J dismisses a costs appeal as totally without merit and restrains further applications.
Court Report3 Jul 2026
EHRC updates guidance after For Women Scotland ruling
Solicitors Journal

EHRC updates guidance after For Women Scotland ruling

EHRC draft code clarifies single-sex services, trans rights, and public bodies’ duties following the For Women Scotland judgment
Practice Notes3 Jul 2026
Goldsmith: High Court declines to compel fresh open-prison decision before Parole Board review
Solicitors Journal

Goldsmith: High Court declines to compel fresh open-prison decision before Parole Board review

Deputy judge quashes refusal to move prisoner to open conditions but refuses a 21-day deadline.
Court Report3 Jul 2026
SJ Interview: Chris Spelman
Solicitors Journal

SJ Interview: Chris Spelman

Chris Spelman is a partner in DWF's London dispute resolution team, specialising in financial services litigation and investigations, whistleblowing matters, and class action, securities and...
Interview1 Jul 2026
Matters of judgement
Solicitors Journal

Matters of judgement

Foreword1 Jul 2026