Muckle LLP promotes Kathryn Boyd as associate

3 Nov 2025Appointments

Muckle LLP has promoted Kathryn Boyd to associate while affirming their commitment to talent development

Muckle LLP has made a notable investment in talent by promoting Kathryn Boyd to associate solicitor within their agriculture, estates and rural property team. Kathryn, who has been part of the firm since 2020, returned from maternity leave to step into this new role, which she was awarded while on leave in November of last year. Her promotion was recommended by David Towns, partner and head of the team, underscoring the firm’s dedication to recognising outstanding talent.

In her new position, Kathryn will handle a wide array of complex issues related to landed estate and rural property. She will also be involved in Muckle’s strategic planning as the firm aims to expand into new regional markets and enhance team development initiatives. Kathryn expressed her appreciation for the support she received during her maternity leave, stating “The support throughout my maternity leave and return to work from Muckle has been excellent. Knowing the firm is still investing in you, even when you’ve got a lot going on outside of work, is incredibly encouraging. It means a lot to feel that level of support while becoming a new mum.”

David Towns acknowledged Kathryn's achievement, stating “Kathryn’s promotion is thoroughly deserved and reflects the calibre of work she consistently delivers, as well as the trust and confidence we have in her.” He further emphasised Muckle's commitment to fostering talent, adding “At Muckle, we’re committed to recognising talent and helping our people to develop and shape their careers. Kathryn is a brilliant solicitor and a valued member of the team and I’m excited to see her continue to grow in this new role.”

This promotion comes on the heels of the firm being named ‘Best Place to Work’ at the North East Business Awards for Northumberland & Tyneside for the third consecutive year, highlighting their ongoing focus on flexible working and inclusive career advancement. Additionally, their agriculture, estates and rural property team has achieved recognition, being ranked in Tier 1 by Legal 500.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Employment tribunal cases rising sharply

Recent Ministry of Justice figures reveal a significant increase in open Employment Tribunal cases and challenges faced by employers

SRA updates guidance for litigation supervision

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has enhanced its supervision guidelines to clarify litigation conduct after recent court rulings

Millions of fathers lack parental responsibility

Many fathers may be surprised to learn about their parental responsibility rights and how to secure them

Re Poundstretcher: cross-class cramdown survives even when six landlord classes say no

The Chancery Division sanctions Poundstretcher's restructuring plan despite six dissenting landlord classes, applying the Adler and Petrofac framework.

Ponsford v Sali: a property partnership's messy divorce shows why documentation wins partnership disputes

The Chancery Division takes a pragmatic, evidence based approach to untangling a property partnership built on undocumented cash dealings.

North Somerset District Council v Secretary of State: failing the flood sequential test is not the end of the story

The Planning Court confirms that a failed flood risk sequential test still gets weighed in the planning balance, not treated as an automatic refusal.

Thomas Armstrong (Aggregates) v Housing Secretary: when landfill buries a quarry's right to be reviewed

The Planning Court applies Pilkington and Hillside to find a 1954 quarry permission can no longer be revived under the ROMP regime.

Clerkenwell Lifestyle v HG Construction: be careful what you call "agreed" in extension of time correspondence

The TCC enforces a £955,943 adjudication award after rejecting a contractor's late attempt to recast email exchanges as a binding settlement.

Ward v Donnellan: when both sides lie, "no order for costs" is not a free pass

The Court of Appeal overturns a no order for costs ruling, finding a judge let a dishonest claimant off too lightly.

London Borough of Camden v BW: when a single missing fact can decide a capacity case

The Court of Protection finds an expert's failure to explore one consequence, losing a placement, was enough to undermine his capacity assessment.

Griffiths v Essex County Council: EAT clarifies causation in discrimination remedy awards and sends pension loss back for recalculation

A single act of indirect disability discrimination can ground a full loss of earnings award, even where a later constructive dismissal claim was framed only...