Sign Up for our Free Newsletter
menu
Solicitors Journal Homepage
  • Home
  • News
  • Digital Edition
  • Practice Notes
    • Area of Law
      • Agricultural
      • ADR & Mediation
      • Asylum & Immigration
      • Aviation
      • Bankruptcy and Insolvency
      • Charities
      • Children
      • Clinical negligence
      • Commercial
      • Competition
      • Construction
      • Conveyancing
      • Costs
      • Crime
      • Data Protection
      • Discrimination
      • Education
      • Employment
      • Energy
      • EU
      • Expert witness
      • Family
      • Financial services & Tax
      • Health & Safety
      • Human rights
      • Inquest
      • Insurance
      • Intellectual property
      • Legal Aid
      • Litigation
      • Maritime
      • Media
      • Mergers & Acquisition
      • Pensions
      • Personal injury
      • Police & Prisons
      • Private client
      • Procedures
      • Professional negligence
      • Property
      • Public Law
      • Regulation
      • Residential
      • Road traffic
      • Vulnerable Clients
    • Management
      • Business Development and Marketing
      • Career development
      • Covid-19
      • Education & Training
      • Equality & diversity
      • Ethics and Compliance
      • Finance
      • Human Resources
      • Knowledge management
      • Leadership
      • Legal services
      • Marketing
      • Pro bono
      • Professional indemnity
      • Regulators
      • Risk & Compliance
      • Technical legal practice
      • Technology
      • Wellbeing
  • Opinion
  • Business
  • International
  • Interview
  • More
    • About
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletter
    • FAQ
    • Guide to Authors
    • Media Pack
    • Site Map
  • Contact Us
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Follow us:
    Twitter
    LinkedIn
© 2023 Solicitors Journal in partnership with the International In-house Counsel Journal | Picture Credits: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors
Dana Denis-Smith

Dana Denis-Smith

Founder - CEOObelisk Support
Quotation Marks

While the majority of firms now offer hybrid working, there persists an ‘inflexible flexibility’ at top firms in particular

Mothers working in the law – building on positive change

Tue May 16 2023Opinion
Mothers working in the law – building on positive change

Dana Denis-Smith explores the situation, post-pandemic facing mothers working in the legal profession

Research from the Next 100 Years project has found 84 percent of mothers working in the law still find it difficult to balance working life with the demands of being a mother, with half believing they are treated differently at work to men with children.

While the pandemic has led to significant positive change – 89 percent said post-COVID-19 remote working has made juggling work and family commitments easier – mothers continue to take on the lion’s share of the responsibility for childcare, with 68 percent saying they do more than their partner.

Support and flexibility

The legal profession is certainly heading in the right direction. There was a time not so long ago when the idea that most people would work from home for at least part of the week would have been considered unworkable. Now, forced by the pandemic and a competitive recruitment market, legal businesses are more conscious than ever of the need to improve their working cultures to ensure they are inclusive and able to attract and retain talented lawyers.

This is reflected by responses to the survey that showed employers are providing support to working mothers, including flexible hours (63 percent) and remote working (80 percent). The overwhelming majority (79 percent) said their employers were supportive when they needed flexibility.

While this is certainly encouraging, the findings make it clear that the majority of women with young children are finding it hard to progress their careers as they would like and do not believe they are being treated in the same way as male peers.

According to our survey, of the 60 percent of mothers who wanted to be able to reduce their hours or work more flexibly in order to spend more time with their children, over half felt unable to do so due to the impact it would have on their career opportunities. Many cited client demands (48 percent) and financial pressures (62 percent), with 22 percent saying that their employer would not agree to a reduction in their hours.

So how do we make progress? How can the profession truly get to grips with a problem that sees too many talented women unable to progress in their careers or dropping out of the law altogether?

While the majority of firms now offer hybrid working, there persists an ‘inflexible flexibility’ at top firms in particular, driven by perceived client demand, the tyranny of the billable hour and a focus on inputs rather than outputs.

We have to be more innovative. That means training management to manage a flexible workplace in a positive way. We need to give lawyers options, with job shares, part-time work, compressed or staggered hours, as well as the option of flexitime.

Role models

We also need more women at the top – including those who work flexibly. Less than half of those who completed our survey felt they had good female role models at a senior level in their organisation.

This lack of visibility serves to reconfirm existing biases and exacerbates imposter syndrome. Diversity in leadership sets the tone for the whole organisation and women in senior positions not only drive change in their own organisations, they set norms and demonstrate what is possible. Rather than pulling up the ladder behind them, good female leaders should take every opportunity to shine a light on their own experiences, as well as championing other women in law.

The pandemic forced the profession to adopt remote working, a huge change which is making life easier for working mothers. Whilst outwardly employers appear supportive, the majority of mothers are still feeling the strain and fear that any move towards more flexible working or part-time hours could have a detrimental impact on their career prospects.

We can’t afford to continue to lose experienced and talented women from the profession. If we want a sustainable workforce and to achieve equality for women working in the profession, we need to see a culture change. That means valuing outputs rather than inputs, with structural changes that give those with family commitments the ability to thrive and progress.

Dana Denis-Smith is founder of the Next 100 Years and CEO of Obelisk Support
next100years.org.uk
obelisksupport.com

Tags:
AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

Parents and carers to be given new employment protections

Fri May 26 2023

Committee finds plans to level up the country risk failure due to funding concerns

Fri May 26 2023

Government consults on enforcement mechanisms for animal health and welfare offences

Fri May 26 2023

Government expands legal aid eligibility

Thu May 25 2023

Council of Europe identifies serious concerns affecting minorities in the UK

Thu May 25 2023

ONS finds international migration to the UK hit new high in 2022

Thu May 25 2023

Government consults on plans to reduce reporting burdens on businesses

Wed May 24 2023

Committee report finds government not taking harms from alcohol seriously enough

Wed May 24 2023

Committee seeks views on the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill

Wed May 24 2023
Featured
A closer look at the trademark dispute between retail giants Lidl and Tesco
FeatureThu May 18 2023
A closer look at the trademark dispute between retail giants Lidl and Tesco

Angela Jack dissects the recent ruling in Lidl Great Britain Ltd & others v Tesco Stores Limited & others [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch)

The UK maternity care crisis: £5bn in avoidable damages claims
FeatureThu May 18 2023
The UK maternity care crisis: £5bn in avoidable damages claims

Billions of pounds in NHS damages claims could have been avoided had recommendations from past reviews been followed by action, argues Kerstin Scheel

Understanding Chinese underground banking and the risks
FeatureThu May 18 2023
Understanding Chinese underground banking and the risks

Laurence Howland explores the mechanisms of Chinese underground banking and the red flags

The building blocks for a successful collaborative culture
FeatureThu May 18 2023
The building blocks for a successful collaborative culture

Chris Marston explores the ways in which law firms can establish a powerful collaborative culture

SJ Interview: James Fulforth
SJ InterviewThu May 18 2023
SJ Interview: James Fulforth

The Solicitors Journal spoke to James Fulforth, Kingsley Napley’s newly appointed Senior Partner, about his experiences in the law, his thoughts on the UK’s tech sector and what he hopes to achieve in his new role

Long-awaited reports and controversial bills dominate
ForewordTue Apr 25 2023
Long-awaited reports and controversial bills dominate

Sophie Cameron takes a look at the news in the April Foreword