Legal aid for inquests faces overhaul

11 May 2026News

The Ministry of Justice has launched a consultation proposing changes to legal aid regulations for inquests

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has initiated a consultation to amend the Civil Legal Aid (Remuneration) Regulations 2013, specifically targeting the legal aid provided for inquests within England and Wales. The proposals aim to introduce a streamlined fee scheme for legal help work related to inquests, which would take effect following the Royal Assent of the corresponding Bill.

One key aspect of this proposal includes consolidating various fee rates for service elements of legal aid. This encompasses costs related to preparation, attendance, travel, waiting, and also encompasses routine communications such as letters and calls. Additionally, the plan seeks to unify advocacy services under a single fee structure, benefiting family members who access legal aid during the inquest process. However, these changes are contingent upon the successful passage of government amendments and Royal Assent.

The consultation is designed for all stakeholders interested in the provision of legal aid for inquests. This includes professionals within the legal field, representative bodies, coroners, members of the judiciary, and bereaved families who have engaged with the inquest system and obtained legal aid assistance.

Mark Evans, President of the Law Society of England and Wales, voiced support for the initiative, stating that “the proposed changes in the way legal aid for inquests will work is a step in the right direction to reduce the day-to-day bureaucracy faced by firms.” He added that “the structural changes will bring both advocacy and solicitors’ work under a single legal aid certificate, creating a simpler and more efficient system.” Nonetheless, Evans expressed concerns regarding the proposed funding levels, remarking that “it will be nowhere near adequate to secure sufficient capacity to handle the vast increase in the number of inquests in which families will qualify for legal aid.” He concluded with a stark warning, emphasising that “without enough lawyers to undertake this work, bereaved families will not find themselves on the level playing field this legislation offers them.”

In response to the consultation, the Law Society plans to provide a detailed submission, meticulously evaluating the practical implications of the suggested changes. As the consultation progresses, the outcome may significantly influence the landscape of legal aid for inquests, ultimately aiming to better serve bereaved families across the country.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Employment tribunal cases rising sharply

Recent Ministry of Justice figures reveal a significant increase in open Employment Tribunal cases and challenges faced by employers

SRA updates guidance for litigation supervision

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has enhanced its supervision guidelines to clarify litigation conduct after recent court rulings

Millions of fathers lack parental responsibility

Many fathers may be surprised to learn about their parental responsibility rights and how to secure them

Re Poundstretcher: cross-class cramdown survives even when six landlord classes say no

The Chancery Division sanctions Poundstretcher's restructuring plan despite six dissenting landlord classes, applying the Adler and Petrofac framework.

Ponsford v Sali: a property partnership's messy divorce shows why documentation wins partnership disputes

The Chancery Division takes a pragmatic, evidence based approach to untangling a property partnership built on undocumented cash dealings.

North Somerset District Council v Secretary of State: failing the flood sequential test is not the end of the story

The Planning Court confirms that a failed flood risk sequential test still gets weighed in the planning balance, not treated as an automatic refusal.

Thomas Armstrong (Aggregates) v Housing Secretary: when landfill buries a quarry's right to be reviewed

The Planning Court applies Pilkington and Hillside to find a 1954 quarry permission can no longer be revived under the ROMP regime.

Clerkenwell Lifestyle v HG Construction: be careful what you call "agreed" in extension of time correspondence

The TCC enforces a £955,943 adjudication award after rejecting a contractor's late attempt to recast email exchanges as a binding settlement.

Ward v Donnellan: when both sides lie, "no order for costs" is not a free pass

The Court of Appeal overturns a no order for costs ruling, finding a judge let a dishonest claimant off too lightly.

London Borough of Camden v BW: when a single missing fact can decide a capacity case

The Court of Protection finds an expert's failure to explore one consequence, losing a placement, was enough to undermine his capacity assessment.

Griffiths v Essex County Council: EAT clarifies causation in discrimination remedy awards and sends pension loss back for recalculation

A single act of indirect disability discrimination can ground a full loss of earnings award, even where a later constructive dismissal claim was framed only...