Solicitors Journal

Law Society urges lord chancellor to rethink legal aid or face judicial review

Law Society urges lord chancellor to rethink legal aid or face judicial review

Government's 'irrational policy-making' has wide consequences for criminal justice system, Law Society warns

The Law Society has urged the lord chancellor to either rethink his decision not to increase criminal legal aid rates by the recommended bare minimum or face a judicial review.

In 2021, an independent review of criminal legal aid, led by Christopher Bellamy KC, recommended an immediate increase in rates of at least 15 per cent.

The government has instead put forward its own package of reforms that includes a gradual fee increase for criminal legal aid solicitors of 11 per cent by 2024.

The Law Society has sent a pre-action letter to the government which challenges its decision-making as unlawful and irrational.

Law Society president, Lubna Shuja, said: “We argue the lord chancellor’s decision not to remunerate solicitors by the bare minimum 15 per cent, which the independent review said was needed immediately over a year ago to prevent the collapse of the criminal defence sector, is unlawful, as is the decision not to take action to address the risk of local market failure.”

The Law Society has urged the government to withdraw its decisions. It will issue a judicial review seeking an order to quash them if the government declines to reconsider.

Shuja said: “The government is choosing to ignore the economic advice and analysis which Lord Bellamy’s review team painstakingly produced, using data the government itself supplied. Instead, the government is implementing policies that run against the rationality of the review it commissioned and accepted.”

The government’s “irrational policy-making’’ will have wide consequences for the small businesses operating in the criminal defence sector, the criminal justice system as a whole and thousands of victims and defendants seeking justice, Shuja said.

She added: “A rational policy path was identified in Lord Bellamy’s comprehensive review and largely accepted, including 15 per cent for barristers, but then the key recommendation affecting solicitors – who were viewed as being in the most ‘parlous state’ – was rejected.

“The Lord Chancellor failed to provide any reasons for ignoring that key recommendation even though there was a legitimate expectation that such reasons would be given. Without reasons, we can only conclude that decision is irrational.”

The Law Society has proposed alternative dispute resolution of the proposed litigation, with independent mediation by a senior lawyer or former judge.

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

Legal job numbers increase but applications decline

Fri Sep 29 2023

BARBRI candidates outperform SRA average by 13%

Fri Sep 29 2023

Justice delayed as thousands of cases wait more than two years to be heard

Thu Sep 28 2023

Solicitors warned over immigration services

Thu Sep 28 2023

New report highlights the transformative effects of domestic abuse training on family lawyers

Wed Sep 27 2023

Asylum seekers stranded on Diego Garcia win challenge against return to Sri Lanka

Wed Sep 27 2023

UN and coalition of NGOs write to Unilever to voice deep concern regarding victims of violence at Unilever tea plantation

Tue Sep 26 2023

Live Facial Recognition: How to Stay Within the Law

Tue Sep 26 2023

Ethics Institute launches taskforce to examine legal services to oligarchs and kleptocrats

Mon Sep 25 2023
FeaturedThe Law Society intervention ensures liberal approach to dealing with concurrent problems on legal aid
The Law Society intervention ensures liberal approach to dealing with concurrent problems on legal aid
Jeanne Kelly elected President of the British Irish Chamber of Commerce
Jeanne Kelly elected President of the British Irish Chamber of Commerce
Families continue to be victims of a broken justice system
Families continue to be victims of a broken justice system
Call for compensation scheme extension to help more abuse survivors
Call for compensation scheme extension to help more abuse survivors
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?