News EditorSolicitors Journal

Law Society: SRA proposals on enforcement processes ‘do not go far enough’

Law Society: SRA proposals on enforcement processes ‘do not go far enough’

Respondent not being present at an inquisition 'cannot be fair'

The Law Society today said safeguards proposed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) to increase the transparency and accountability of its enforcement processes do not go far enough.

The SRA’s internal fining powers increased from £2,000 to £25,000 in July this year for traditional law firms and solicitors.

Law Society president Lubna Shuja said the increase meant the SRA will decide more cases of alleged misconduct in-house, instead of referring them to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT).

“There needs to be a clearer functional separation of the roles of investigators and adjudicators to maintain the confidence of the profession and the public. Adjudicators, as decision makers, need to be completely independent”, said Shuja.

“Adjudicators, as SRA employees, have access to the regulator’s records and can see a solicitor’s past regulatory history. This could prejudice their views and could lead to an unfair decision.

“We therefore suggest the information adjudicators can access be restricted to ensure a fairer process”.

The SRA has also proposed to give adjudicators sole discretion to invite witnesses to be interviewed to test their evidence and credibility.

Shuja said this would mean adjudicators were then acting as investigators, not decision-makers. The SRA has also proposed that a respondent would not be present at such an inquisition. Shuja said: “This cannot be fair”.

She added: “The SRA has not provided the criteria for when or how an adjudicator may exercise such a discretion meaning these proposals are ill-defined and could lead to unfair outcomes.

“We have serious concerns that adjudicators would not be acting purely in their capacity as decision makers but would instead be acting as investigators.

“The regulator proposes increasing fines against firms by up to 5% of turnover, which is excessive and unjustified”.

The Law Society urged the SRA to reconsider its proposals “to achieve the aims of justice, fairness, transparency, proportionality and consistency.”

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

Legal job numbers increase but applications decline

Fri Sep 29 2023

BARBRI candidates outperform SRA average by 13%

Fri Sep 29 2023

Justice delayed as thousands of cases wait more than two years to be heard

Thu Sep 28 2023

Solicitors warned over immigration services

Thu Sep 28 2023

New report highlights the transformative effects of domestic abuse training on family lawyers

Wed Sep 27 2023

Asylum seekers stranded on Diego Garcia win challenge against return to Sri Lanka

Wed Sep 27 2023

UN and coalition of NGOs write to Unilever to voice deep concern regarding victims of violence at Unilever tea plantation

Tue Sep 26 2023

Live Facial Recognition: How to Stay Within the Law

Tue Sep 26 2023

Ethics Institute launches taskforce to examine legal services to oligarchs and kleptocrats

Mon Sep 25 2023
FeaturedThe Law Society intervention ensures liberal approach to dealing with concurrent problems on legal aid
The Law Society intervention ensures liberal approach to dealing with concurrent problems on legal aid
Jeanne Kelly elected President of the British Irish Chamber of Commerce
Jeanne Kelly elected President of the British Irish Chamber of Commerce
Families continue to be victims of a broken justice system
Families continue to be victims of a broken justice system
Call for compensation scheme extension to help more abuse survivors
Call for compensation scheme extension to help more abuse survivors
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?