Law Society issues guide on AI risks

25 Mar 2026News

The Law Society of England and Wales has released a new guide to help solicitors manage AI risks effectively

In an effort to improve technology decisions among legal practitioners, the Law Society of England and Wales has published a practical guide addressing the risks associated with the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI). As more firms incorporate AI into their routine operations—like drafting documents and analysing case materials—they are urged to consider the potential downsides that come with these advancements. While AI presents numerous benefits, including improved efficiency, it also brings several risks that cannot be overlooked.

The guide warns that poor adoption of AI may lead to significant vulnerabilities, particularly in areas such as data protection and output reliability. Ian Jeffery, chief executive at the Law Society, emphasised the importance of safe technology integration by stating, “Our new guide helps firms ask the right questions, avoid common pitfalls and make informed decisions." In highlighting the double-edged nature of technology, he noted, “The benefits of technology can be enormous, allowing more time to focus on original thinking and innovation. But the downside can be considerable if firms do not adopt new technologies, including AI, safely and responsibly to serve the people and communities they live in.”

This newly released document details practical steps to help solicitors ascertain their business needs, choose appropriate technology, and implement it effectively. Additionally, it includes downloadable templates aimed at bolstering procurement processes, ensuring firms can adopt technology in a manner that is both efficient and secure. The Law Society continues to stress that human oversight remains a critical component in the deployment of AI tools, particularly given their propensity for inherent biases and inaccuracies. As the landscape of legal practice evolves with technology, resources such as this guide will be vital for maintaining integrity and trust within the profession.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com

Latest Articles

Paying for information: should the SFO incentivise whistleblowers?

The Serious Fraud Office is considering US-style financial incentives for whistleblowers in a bid to strengthen its intelligence-gathering capabilities

Affordable housing under pressure: navigating regulation, viability and the 10-year funding horizon

As regulatory obligations multiply and viability pressures intensify, housing lawyers must help registered providers balance building safety, decarbonisation and development delivery while navigating the Government’s new long-term funding framework

Law firms face increased scrutiny from regulator

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has intensified its oversight of law firms following several accounting breaches

Defendants found guilty in landmark prosecution

A landmark private prosecution secured guilty verdicts for four individuals involved in defrauding investors of millions

Rising numbers of UK trips to Dignitas raise concerns

In 2025, UK residents visiting the Swiss assisted dying clinic Dignitas increased to 43 amid political debates on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill

Putting children first: rethinking the family lawyer’s role in separation

The Family Solutions Group sets out proposals to embed child-focused practice in family law following recent procedural reforms

ACL Netherlands v Sandelson: currency risk, interest and the Autonomy fraud aftermath

Currency fluctuations, settlement credits and pre-judgement interest following the landmark HP–Autonomy fraud litigation.

Crane Bank v DFCU Bank: High Court refuses late amendments to defence based on PwC reports

Court holds disputed amendments neither consequential nor adequately particularised, with trial prejudice decisive.

Hammond v Herrington Carmichael: when interim invoices become statute bills

Costs Judge Whalan rules on whether 29 solicitor invoices constituted interim statute bills — with significant consequences for assessment rights.

Sir Robert Buckland leads Amess review

Sir Robert Buckland KC is appointed to lead a review into the circumstances surrounding Sir David Amess's murder

Justice Investments v Visalia Energia: security for costs, strike-out, and the limits of open justice

Security for costs ordered against an apparently impecunious claimant company where evidence of beneficial ownership and control was opaque and incomplete.

Dhillon v Orchard: Court of Appeal rules section 26 FSMA rights cannot bind successors in title

Rights of recovery under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 do not extend to third-party purchasers of property.

Ranpariya v Government of India: High Court grants partial permission in complex extradition appeal

Extradition appeal raises significant questions on particularisation, torture risk, and the reliability of Indian diplomatic assurances.

KD v Home Secretary: Court of Appeal overturns asylum ruling for convicted murderer

A Turkish national who killed his wife cannot rely on the Refugee Convention due to danger to the community.

SJ Interview: Keith Froud

Keith Froud, Global Co-CEO and International Chief Executive of Eversheds Sutherland, has spent over three decades in corporate M&A before moving into global leadership. In this interview, he reflects on deal strategy, decision-making in complex organisations, the evolution of the international legal market, and the impact of technological change on the profession

Power Shifts, Responsibility Holds

From AI liability and freezing injunctions to private equity governance and regulatory reform, this issue traces a legal system adapting to new pressures while keeping accountability firmly human.