James Campisi joins Corrs Chambers Westgarth

13 Jul 2026|Announcements|Add your comment

Corrs Chambers Westgarth announces the appointment of corporate partner James Campisi, enhancing their private equity expertise in Sydney

Australia's premier independent law firm, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, has officially welcomed corporate partner and private equity expert James Campisi to its Sydney office. Previously a partner at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett in London, he brings extensive experience in advising private equity sponsors and corporate clients on various M&A transactions including private acquisitions, public takeovers, carve-out transactions, and consortium deals. His sector experience encompasses technology, financial services, consumer, real estate, and infrastructure.

Commenting on the appointment, Corrs Senior Partner and CEO Gavin MacLaren said "James has significant experience in the London market advising private equity clients and strategics on their most challenging cross-border transactions. His appointment will further enhance the firm's strong capabilities in this area. We are delighted to welcome James to the Corrs partnership." With this strategic hire, Corrs aims to strengthen its position in the competitive legal landscape and provide unparalleled service to its clients in the private equity sector.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Comments

Latest Articles

Law Commission seeks reform for kinship families

The Law Commission proposes significant reforms to kinship care law to ensure clearer rights for families affected by complex regulations

NHS Resolution faces rising clinical claims

NHS Resolution's recent report reveals a rise in clinical negligence claims and costs amidst ongoing challenges

AI liability clarified but gaps remain

The UK Jurisdiction Taskforce has issued a significant statement on AI liability, identifying legal uncertainties and areas needing urgent government attention

Narinder Kaur v Laurence Fox: High Court rules on meaning in 18 publications and refuses delivery up of photograph

Linden J finds several tweets do not refer to the claimant or amount only to vulgar abuse.

Briety Shipping v Trafigura Maritime Logistics: Commercial Court holds LNG hire spread cannot be read as an absolute value

Waksman J construes JKM minus TTF as a one-way bet, rejecting rectification and finding claim time-barred.

Geeks Ltd v Watts: Court of Appeal strikes down training fee clawback as unreasonable restraint of trade

Bean LJ holds financial disincentives are not exempt from scrutiny, whatever the drafting.

Arunoday v General Medical Council: High Court dismisses appeal against erasure on findings of fact

Poole J restates that credibility findings made after cross-examination are virtually unassailable on appeal.

Todd v Marsh: High Court upholds paper title boundary over long-standing deer fence

Judge's misstatement of the general boundaries rule did not undermine an otherwise sound construction.

Nexans France v London Array: Court of Appeal refuses permission in power cables follow-on damages claim

Green LJ upholds CAT findings on leniency conduct, adverse inferences and counterfactual bidders.

R (BUJ) v London Borough of Bromley: Court of Appeal quashes adult education centre closure over failure to consult

Section 31(2A) threshold not met where consultation might have shifted the option chosen.

Ermis v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government: inspector's "precise and unambiguous" test quashed

Planning Court finds inadequate reasoning and a misunderstanding of how assured shorthold tenancies roll over.