Investing in digital services for justice

18 Sept 2025News

The Law Society of England and Wales praises HMCTS’s report on digital civil and tribunal services

The Law Society of England and Wales has expressed its support for the recently published evaluation of digital services by HM Courts and Tribunals Services (HMCTS). This comprehensive report focuses on both professional and personal users of digital civil, family, and tribunal services. Richard Atkinson, president of the Law Society, remarked that “the release of HMCTS’s digital services evaluation is welcome. It clearly shows that investment in reliable technology can improve efficiency in this vital public service and strengthen access to justice.” He emphasised the importance of designing technology that meets the needs of all users, including solicitors and legal professionals who depend on these services for their clients.

Atkinson highlighted that the findings from the society's 21st Century Justice project indicate that a modern justice system must address people's needs through responsible technology deployment. He stressed the necessity for sustained investment, saying that “to achieve the reform that HMCTS is aiming for, investment needs to be sustained. Gaps in functionality and inadequate user support risk creating problems, undermining improvements and preventing the system from working fairly for all.”

In conclusion, the Law Society encourages HMCTS to collaborate closely with solicitors. This partnership is essential to ensure that digital services are effective and promote greater access to justice for all individuals seeking legal remedies. The overall message is clear: investments in digital services are crucial to unlocking civil justice in today’s rapidly evolving digital landscape

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Latest Articles

Employment tribunal cases rising sharply

Recent Ministry of Justice figures reveal a significant increase in open Employment Tribunal cases and challenges faced by employers

SRA updates guidance for litigation supervision

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has enhanced its supervision guidelines to clarify litigation conduct after recent court rulings

Millions of fathers lack parental responsibility

Many fathers may be surprised to learn about their parental responsibility rights and how to secure them

Re Poundstretcher: cross-class cramdown survives even when six landlord classes say no

The Chancery Division sanctions Poundstretcher's restructuring plan despite six dissenting landlord classes, applying the Adler and Petrofac framework.

Ponsford v Sali: a property partnership's messy divorce shows why documentation wins partnership disputes

The Chancery Division takes a pragmatic, evidence based approach to untangling a property partnership built on undocumented cash dealings.

North Somerset District Council v Secretary of State: failing the flood sequential test is not the end of the story

The Planning Court confirms that a failed flood risk sequential test still gets weighed in the planning balance, not treated as an automatic refusal.

Thomas Armstrong (Aggregates) v Housing Secretary: when landfill buries a quarry's right to be reviewed

The Planning Court applies Pilkington and Hillside to find a 1954 quarry permission can no longer be revived under the ROMP regime.

Clerkenwell Lifestyle v HG Construction: be careful what you call "agreed" in extension of time correspondence

The TCC enforces a £955,943 adjudication award after rejecting a contractor's late attempt to recast email exchanges as a binding settlement.

Ward v Donnellan: when both sides lie, "no order for costs" is not a free pass

The Court of Appeal overturns a no order for costs ruling, finding a judge let a dishonest claimant off too lightly.

London Borough of Camden v BW: when a single missing fact can decide a capacity case

The Court of Protection finds an expert's failure to explore one consequence, losing a placement, was enough to undermine his capacity assessment.

Griffiths v Essex County Council: EAT clarifies causation in discrimination remedy awards and sends pension loss back for recalculation

A single act of indirect disability discrimination can ground a full loss of earnings award, even where a later constructive dismissal claim was framed only...