How to advise on settlement agreements

How to advise on settlement agreements

Andrew Gray offers some tips on best practice for solicitors acting for both employers and employees

Creativity is not something which is normally associated with us solicitors, but I encourage all those who are advising on settlement agreements – either for employers or for employees – to think tangentially. Doing so will be to the benefit of our clients and our pockets.Unknown unknowns

When presented with the terms of a settlement agreement by your client, please remember that this is not a fait accompli. Most employers and employees have no idea of what is possible in a settlement agreement. With the exception of a few necessary specific terms, a settlement agreement is a standard contract, the terms of which can be pretty much anything (within reason).

We employment law advisers must remember that, just because most law firms use precedent settlement agreements, it does not mean that we must act in such a regimented manner. It is our responsibility to open our client’s eyes as to what is possible. Henry Ford famously said: “If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses.” The same applies here. If your client asks for a horse, explain to them that a car is possible, giving them the option.

Negotiate and renegotiate

Particularly when acting for an employee who has been presented with a settlement agreement by their employer, usually out of the blue, you will find that often no negotiations have taken place. Usually an employee client will tell you – with glee – that their ‘beneficent’ employer has agreed to pay you £250 in respect of their legal fees. Next, they will usually tell you that they expect to pay nothing for your services: they have been fired; they don’t have a job; and they won’t pay out of their pocket to the rich lawyer.

The timid among us might accept these instructions. Some would then dust off their firm’s standard precedent advice on settlement agreements (which will have more caveats than a homebuyer’s survey), then sign the adviser’s certificate, never to see the client again. I encourage my firm’s lawyers to challenge our client’s instructions. The poor client is unlikely to have faced such a situation before and, having taken instructions from the employer for so long, they are, in a lemming-like way, taking this final insult without a fight.

Explain to your client that you are a seasoned negotiator and that you are likely to be able to enhance the deal. Offer a fixed fee for renegotiating the terms. Most clients would spend £250 if there was a better than 50 per cent chance that their settlement terms would be enhanced by more than £250. If you manage to squeeze out more money from their soon-to-be former employer, your client will be appreciative.

Departure announcement

In most settlement agreements there is no mention of how the departure of the employee will be handled inside the employer organisation, while complying with the confidentiality clause. The employee has a similar predicament: what to say when asked.

When I explain the confidentiality clause to my clients, I remind them of the maxim from Fight Club: the first rule of settlement agreements is not to talk about settlement agreements; the second rule of settlement agreements is not to talk about settlement agreements.

But this is nonsensical. I encourage all advisers, on either side, to prepare a draft announcement, even for junior employees. Doing so may help all parties to move on.

Timing of the termination

As much as an employee loves a chunk of cash from the former employer, they are often more eager to secure a new job. Securing a new job is infinitely easier when you already have a job. Hasty employers often want to be rid of the employee as soon as possible and are happy to throw some money at them. What if, instead, the employer essentially keeps the employee on garden leave to enable the employee to find a new role?

Inevitably, an employee without a new job will demand a larger payment from their employer. An employee with a new job, perhaps now on more money, will treat any payment from the employer as a bonus. A bold employee adviser might even suggest a lower lump sum, but with an extended termination date. That would be novel.

Andrew Gray is a solicitor and the founder of Truth Legal Solicitors

@TruthLegal www.truthlegal.com

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

Axiom Ince collapses: Police investigation begins

Tue Oct 03 2023

Barrister Carly Walters ordered to be disbarred

Tue Oct 03 2023

Fines to increase for employers without robust employment screening

Mon Oct 02 2023

IBA publishes for the first time a legal agenda identifying profession’s most pressing concerns

Mon Oct 02 2023

Black History Month: Legal profession celebrates influential Black women lawyers

Mon Oct 02 2023

The Law Society intervention ensures liberal approach to dealing with concurrent problems on legal aid

Fri Sep 29 2023

Jeanne Kelly elected President of the British Irish Chamber of Commerce

Fri Sep 29 2023

Families continue to be victims of a broken justice system

Fri Sep 29 2023

Call for compensation scheme extension to help more abuse survivors

Fri Sep 29 2023
FeaturedChris Packham legal action over Rishi Sunak's announcement
Chris Packham legal action over Rishi Sunak's announcement
Why civil mediation is the smarter choice than pressing for your day in court
Why civil mediation is the smarter choice than pressing for your day in court
SRA now managing the Solicitors Indemnity Fund
SRA now managing the Solicitors Indemnity Fund
Law Society concerned over fixed recoverable costs rollout
Law Society concerned over fixed recoverable costs rollout
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?