Government targets millions from fake lawyers

23 Oct 2025News

The UK government is implementing measures to confiscate money from rogue immigration advisers who have exploited the system

The Home Office has announced a new crackdown on sham immigration advisers who have been illegally posing as lawyers. Under the extended powers of the Proceeds of Crime Act, the Immigration Advice Authority (IAA) will now have the authority to seize the illicit earnings of these unscrupulous advisers. This funding will not only serve to reinvest in frontline policing and border security but will also support the innovative Multi Agency Cash Cell, which collaborates with various government and law enforcement agencies to combat the influx of criminal finance into the UK.

This initiative aims to prevent rogue advisers from profiting off their unlawful immigration advice. For the first time, the IAA will be equipped to trace and freeze assets, recover illegal earnings, and hold offenders accountable without needing police assistance. These misleading advisers have been known to charge desperate individuals thousands of pounds. In one notable case, a fraudulent adviser was reported to have made over half a million pounds, while three others managed to accumulate more than £3 million by targeting victims online with misleading immigration advice.

Rogue immigration 'lawyers' frequently act as intermediaries for those looking to exploit the immigration system or profit through ineffective or fraudulent counsel. The Proceeds of Crime Act is a vital tool within the criminal justice system, as it plays a crucial role in both disrupting and deterring criminal activities by stripping offenders of their illegal gains.

Security Minister Dan Jarvis stated that rogue immigration advisers exploiting the system will “pay the price." He emphasised that backing the Immigration Advice Authority with stringent new powers will help in confiscating criminals’ dirty money and using it to bolster borders and enhance public safety.

These changes will follow consultations that will run until the end of the year. Additionally, as part of the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill, those posing as immigration lawyers could face fines of up to £15,000. As the bill makes its way through Parliament, the government is intensifying operational actions to secure borders, highlighting that over 35,000 individuals without the right to be in the UK have already been returned. The government remains committed to a firm stance on illegal migration and will continue to take necessary actions to uphold border security.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Employment tribunal cases rising sharply

Recent Ministry of Justice figures reveal a significant increase in open Employment Tribunal cases and challenges faced by employers

SRA updates guidance for litigation supervision

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has enhanced its supervision guidelines to clarify litigation conduct after recent court rulings

Millions of fathers lack parental responsibility

Many fathers may be surprised to learn about their parental responsibility rights and how to secure them

Re Poundstretcher: cross-class cramdown survives even when six landlord classes say no

The Chancery Division sanctions Poundstretcher's restructuring plan despite six dissenting landlord classes, applying the Adler and Petrofac framework.

Ponsford v Sali: a property partnership's messy divorce shows why documentation wins partnership disputes

The Chancery Division takes a pragmatic, evidence based approach to untangling a property partnership built on undocumented cash dealings.

North Somerset District Council v Secretary of State: failing the flood sequential test is not the end of the story

The Planning Court confirms that a failed flood risk sequential test still gets weighed in the planning balance, not treated as an automatic refusal.

Thomas Armstrong (Aggregates) v Housing Secretary: when landfill buries a quarry's right to be reviewed

The Planning Court applies Pilkington and Hillside to find a 1954 quarry permission can no longer be revived under the ROMP regime.

Clerkenwell Lifestyle v HG Construction: be careful what you call "agreed" in extension of time correspondence

The TCC enforces a £955,943 adjudication award after rejecting a contractor's late attempt to recast email exchanges as a binding settlement.

Ward v Donnellan: when both sides lie, "no order for costs" is not a free pass

The Court of Appeal overturns a no order for costs ruling, finding a judge let a dishonest claimant off too lightly.

London Borough of Camden v BW: when a single missing fact can decide a capacity case

The Court of Protection finds an expert's failure to explore one consequence, losing a placement, was enough to undermine his capacity assessment.

Griffiths v Essex County Council: EAT clarifies causation in discrimination remedy awards and sends pension loss back for recalculation

A single act of indirect disability discrimination can ground a full loss of earnings award, even where a later constructive dismissal claim was framed only...